Skip to main content
Log in

Die Twitter-Diskussion beim #DGU16-Kongress

Twitter activity at the German Society of Urology congress #DGU16

  • GeSRU
  • Published:
Der Urologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4

Literatur

  1. Chung A, Woo H (2016) Twitter in urology and other surgical specialties at global conferences. ANZ J Surg 86:224–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Matta R, Doiron C, Leveridge MJ (2014) The dramatic increase in social media in urology. J Urol 192:494–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Beck.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

A. Beck, A. Cebulla, J. Salem, J. Struck und H. Borgmann geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beck, A., Cebulla, A., Salem, J. et al. Die Twitter-Diskussion beim #DGU16-Kongress. Urologe 56, 77–79 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-016-0285-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-016-0285-0

Navigation