Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Klarstellung zur Kritik an PREFERE

Clarification regarding criticism on PREFERE

  • Kommentare
  • Published:
Der Urologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Porzsolt F (2015) Kommentar zur PREFERE-Studie. Urologe A 54:1435–1436

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Roloff C (2015) NIL NOCERE. Urologe A 54:1433–1434

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ulm K (2013) Zu wenig statistische Power? URO-NEWS 17:14–15

  4. Weißbach L (2015) PREFERE Studie – der Wunsch nach Wirksamkeitsnachweis bei der Behandlung des Niedrigrisiko-PCa in Studien. Vortrag bei der Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Hämatologie und Onkologie. Basel, 11.10.2015

  5. Parker C et al (2006) A model of the natural history of screen-detected prostate cancer, and the effect of radical treatment on overall survival. Br J of Cancer 94:1361–1368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bill-Axelson A et al (2014) Radical Prostatectomy or Watchful Waiting in Early Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med 370:932–942

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ross HM et al (2012) Do adenocarcinomas of the prostate with Gleason score (GS) ≤ 6 have the potential to metastasize to lymph nodes? Am J Surg Pathol 36(9):1346–1352

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Klotz L et al (2010) Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 28(1):126–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. M. Stöckle gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Straße, 66424, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland

    M. Stöckle

Authors
  1. M. Stöckle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Stöckle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stöckle, M. Klarstellung zur Kritik an PREFERE. Urologe 54, 1792–1794 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-015-4031-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-015-4031-9

Search

Navigation