Skip to main content

Extrakorporale Stoßwellenlithotripsie (ESWL) vs. perkutane Nephrolithotomie (PCNL) oder retrograde intrarenale Chirurgie (RIRS) bei Harnsteinen

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones

Der Urologe volume 54, pages 1283–1286 (2015)Cite this article

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Literatur

  1. Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV et al (2001) Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis-initial results. J Urol 166(6):2072–2080

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Carlsson P, Kinn AC, Tiselius HG et al (1992) Cost effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for medium-sized kidney stones. A randomised clinical trial. Scand J Urol Nephrol 26(3):257–263

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Deem S, Defade B, Modak A et al (2011) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for moderate sized kidney stones. Urology 78(4):739–743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yuruk E, Binbay M, Sari E et al (2010) A prospective, randomized trial of management for asymptomatic lower pole calculi. J Urol 183(4):1424–1428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pearle MS, Lingeman JE, Leveillee R et al (2005) Prospective, randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less. J Urol 173(6):2005–2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. A. Miernik u. S. Schmidt sind Mitglieder von UroEvidence. Die Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. UroEvidence@Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie, Kuno-Fischer-Straße 8, 14057, Berlin, Deutschland

    S. Schmidt

  2. Department Chirurgie, Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79106, Freiburg, Deutschland

    A. Miernik

Authors
  1. S. Schmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Miernik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to S. Schmidt or A. Miernik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schmidt, S., Miernik, A. Extrakorporale Stoßwellenlithotripsie (ESWL) vs. perkutane Nephrolithotomie (PCNL) oder retrograde intrarenale Chirurgie (RIRS) bei Harnsteinen. Urologe 54, 1283–1286 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-015-3928-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-015-3928-7