Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Die Verwendung von PubMed zur Verbesserung evidenzbasierter Medizin in der Urologie

Use of PubMed to improve evidence-based medicine in routine urological practice

  • Übersichten
  • Published:
Der Urologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die Umsetzung evidenzbasierter Medizin (EBM) in der täglichen klinischen Praxis stellt eine wichtige Herausforderung der modernen Medizin dar. Grundvoraussetzung zur Umsetzung der EBM ist das Wissen über eine akkurate Literaturakquisition. PubMed ist eine gängige freie Datenbank der US National Library of Medicine mit > 21 Mio. Einträgen aus dem Gebiet der Medizin und Naturwissenschaften. In diesem Artikel soll anhand eines Fallbeispiels die möglichst effektive Verwendung von PubMed in der täglichen urologischen Praxis erläutert werden. Der Artikel beschreibt die simple Handhabung von PubMed, um die bestmöglichen Einträge mit der höchsten Evidenz zu selektionieren. Ein gutes Verständnis der Verwendung von PubMed kann zu einer Verbesserung der EBM in der täglichen urologischen Praxis beitragen.

Abstract

Applying evidence-based medicine in daily clinical practice is the basis of patient-centered medicine and knowledge of accurate literature acquisition skills is necessary for informed clinical decision-making. PubMed is an easy accessible, free bibliographic database comprising over 21 million citations from the medical field, life-science journals and online books. The article summarizes the effective use of PubMed in routine urological clinical practice based on a common case scenario. This article explains the simple use of PubMed to obtain the best search results with the highest evidence. Accurate knowledge about the use of PubMed in routine clinical practice can improve evidence-based medicine and also patient treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Eddy DM (2005) Evidence-based medicine: a unified approach. Health Aff (Millwood) 24:9–17

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dahm P, Konety BR (2011) Evidence-based medicine in urology. World J Urol 29:255–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dahm P, Yeung LL, Gallucci M et al (2009) How to use a clinical practice guideline. J Urol 181:472–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Scales CD Jr, Preminger GM, Keitz SA, Dahm P (2007) Evidence based clinical practice: a primer for urologists. J Urol 178:775–782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Krupski TL, Schardt CM, Fesperman SF, Dahm P (2009) Evidence-based urology in practice: how to use PubMed effectively. BJU Int 103:1156–1159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Katchman EA, Milo G, Paul M et al (2005) Three-day vs longer duration of antibiotic treatment for cystitis in women: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med 118:1196–1207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Guyatt G, Drummond R, Meade MO, Cook DJ (2008) Users‘ guide to the medical literature: a manual for evidence-based clinical practice, 2. edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

  8. Haynes RB, Wilczynski N (2005) Finding the gold in MEDLINE: clinical queries. ACP J Club A 142:8–9

    Google Scholar 

  9. Haynes RB, Wilczynski N, McKibbon KA et al (1994) Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound studies in MEDLINE. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1:447–458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wagenlehner FM, Schmiemann G, Hoyme U et al (2011) National S3 guideline on uncomplicated urinary tract infection: recommendations for treatment and management of uncomplicated community-acquired bacterial urinary tract infections in adult patients. Urologe A 50:153–169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt für sich und seine Koautoren an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland

    M. Rink, L.A. Kluth, F.K. Chun & M. Fisch

  2. Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, USA

    M. Rink, L.A. Kluth & S.F. Shariat

  3. Division of Medical Oncology, Brady Urologic Health Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, 525 East 68th Street, 10021, New York, USA

    S.F. Shariat

  4. Department of Urology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Gainesville, USA

    P. Dahm

Authors
  1. M. Rink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L.A. Kluth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S.F. Shariat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. F.K. Chun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. Fisch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. P. Dahm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S.F. Shariat.

Additional information

Dr. Michael Rink und Dr. Luis A. Kluth waren zu gleichen Teilen an der Manuskripterstellung beteiligt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rink, M., Kluth, L., Shariat, S. et al. Die Verwendung von PubMed zur Verbesserung evidenzbasierter Medizin in der Urologie. Urologe 52, 367–372 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-013-3147-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-013-3147-z

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation