Skip to main content
Log in

Vorzeitiger Abbruch randomisierter kontrollierter Studien

Vorteilsbedingter Therapieeffekt

Randomized controlled trials terminated prematurely

Beneficial therapy effects

  • Übersichten
  • Published:
Der Urologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Randomisierte kontrollierte Studien (RCT), die aufgrund eines vorteilsbedingten Therapieeffekts vorzeitig abgebrochen werden, nehmen einen immer größeren Stellenwert in der urologischen Literatur ein und genießen darüber hinaus oft eine große Beachtung in der Öffentlichkeit. Urologen, die eine evidenzbasierte Medizin praktizieren, sollten sich den potentiellen Biases von vorzeitig abgebrochenen RCT und den möglichen Auswirkungen auf die Ergebnisse bewusst sein. Dieses Review soll die verschiedenen Ursachen für einen vorzeitigen Studienabbruch und die damit einhergehende Problematik verdeutlichen.

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) stopped prematurely for beneficial therapy effects are becoming increasingly more prevalent in the urological literature and often receive great attention in the public and medical media. Urologists who practice evidence-based medicine should be aware of the potential bias and the different reasons why and how early termination of RCTs can and will affect the results. This review provides insights into the challenges clinical urologists face by interpreting the results of prematurely terminated RCTs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Poldermans D, Boersma E, Bax JJ et al (1999) The effect of bisoprolol on perioperative mortality and myocardial infarction in high-risk patients undergoing vascular surgery. Dutch Echocardiographic Cardiac Risk Evaluation Applying Stress Echocardiography Study Group. N Engl J Med 341(24):1789–1794

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Berghe G van den, Wouters P, Weekers F et al (2001) Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 345(19):1359–1367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2009) Sunitinib for the first-line treatment of advanced and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma. NICE technology appraisal. Guidance 169. NICE, London, http://guidance.nice.org.uk. Zugegriffen: June 2010

  4. Attard G, Belldegrun AS, Bono JS de (2005) Selective blockade of androgenic steroid synthesis by novel lyase inhibitors as a therapeutic strategy for treating metastatic prostate cancer. BJU Int 96(9):1241–1246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bono JS de, Logothetis CJ, Molina A et al (2011) Abiraterone and increased survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 364(21):1995–2005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Montori V, Devereaux PJ, Schunemann H et al (2008) Randomized trials stopped early to benefit. In: Guyatt GH, Drummond R, Meade MO, Cook DJ (eds) Users‘ guides to the medical literature: a manual for evidence-based clinical practice, 2. edn. American Medical Association, New York, pp 153–165

  7. Montori VM, Devereaux PJ, Adhikari NK et al (2005) Randomized trials stopped early for benefit: a systematic review. JAMA 294:2203–2209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bassler D, Briel M, Montori VM et al (2010) Stopping randomized trials early for benefit and estimation of treatment effects: systematic review and metaregression analysis. JAMA 303:1180–1187

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fleming TR, Harrington DP, O’Brien PC (1984) Designs for group sequential tests. Control Clin Trials 5(4):348–361

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol 64(4):383–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Canfield SE, Dahm P, Evidence-Based Urology Working Group (2010) Evidence-based urology in practice: incorporating patient values in evidence-based clinical decision making. BJU Int 105:4–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt für sich und seine Koautoren an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S.F. Shariat MD.

Additional information

Dr. Luis A. Kluth und Dr. Michael Rink waren zu gleichen Teilen an der Manuskripterstellung beteiligt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kluth, L., Rink, M., Ahyai, S. et al. Vorzeitiger Abbruch randomisierter kontrollierter Studien. Urologe 52, 1080–1083 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-013-3144-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-013-3144-2

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation