Skip to main content
Log in

Harnableitung und Dickdarm

Das Transversumconduit und der Transversumpouch

Urinary diversion and colon

Transverse conduit and transverse pouch

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Urologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Als inkontinenter oder kontinenter Blasenersatz wird überwiegend das terminale Ileum verwendet. Bei bestrahlten Patienten jedoch ist bei einer Harnableitung unter Verwendung von Ileumsegmenten bzw. des Ileozäkalpols mit einer erhöhten Rate an Früh- und Spätkomplikationen zu rechnen. Deswegen sollte dieses Patientenkollektiv, wenn nach pelviner Bestrahlung eine Harnableitung indiziert ist, ein Transversumconduit (TC) bzw. einen Transversumpouch als Methode der Wahl erhalten. Erfolgskonzept dieser hohen Harnableitung ist in erster Linie die Verwendung nicht bestrahlter Darm- und Harnleiteranteile. Dass die Mehrheit der Urologen wenig Erfahrung in der Dickdarmchirurgie hat, sollte, durch entsprechendes Training oder Behandlung dieses Risikopatientenkollektivs an Zentren, kompensiert werden.

Abstract

In the vast majority of cases the terminal ileum is used for incontinent or continent bladder substitution. However, in irradiated patients the use of ileum segments or the ileocecal reservoir is associated with an increased risk of early and late complications. For this reason these patients should be treated with a transverse conduit or pouch as the method of choice if urinary diversion is indicated. The superior outcome of this high urinary diversion is due to the use of non-irradiated segments of the colon and ureter. The lack of experience in large bowel surgery by today’s urologists should be compensated by training or referral of these high risk patients to a specialized center.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7
Abb. 8
Abb. 9
Abb. 10
Abb. 11

Literatur

  1. Beckley S, Wajsman Z, Pontes JE, Murphy G (1982) Transverse colon conduit: a method of urinary diversion after pelvic irradiation. J Urol 128:464–468

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Beddoe AM, Boyce JG, Remy JC et al (1987) Stented versus nonstented transverse colon conduits: a comparative report. Gynecol Oncol 27:305–315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bihrle R, Foster RS, Steidle CP et al (1989) Creation of a transverse colon–gastric composite reservoir: a new technique. J Urol 141:1217–1220

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bihrle R, Klee LW, Adams MC, Foster RS (1991) Early clinical experience with the transverse colon-gastric tube continent urinary reservoir. J Urol 146:751–753

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. D’Ancona CA, Cavaller AR, Ferreira U et al (2005) Continent urinary diversion in patients with pelvic irradiation: an alternative utilizing transverse colon reservoir. Int Urol Nephrol 37:499–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eisenberg MS, Dorin RP, Bartsch G et al (2010) Early complications of cystectomy after high dose pelvic radiation. J Urol 184:2264–2269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Elder DD, Moisey CU, Rees RW (1979) A long-term follow-up of the colonic conduit operation in children. Br J Urol 51:462–465

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferreira U, Rodrigues Netto Jr, Lucena R (2000) The transverse colonic reservoir: the unicamp technique. BJU Int 85:486–489

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Filipas D, Fisch M, Leissner J et al (1999) Urinary diversion in childhood: indications for different techniques. BJU Int 84:897–904

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fisch M, Riedmiller H, Hohenfellner R (1991) Pyelotransverse pyelocolostomy: an alternative method for high urinary diversion in patients with extended bilateral ureter damage. Eur Urol 19:142–149

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fisch M, Wammack R, Hohenfellner R (1996) Kolon-transversum- ascendens/descendens Pouch. Akt Urol 27:l–Vlll

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hautmann RE, Petriconi R de, Volkmer BG (2009) Neobladder formation after pelvic irradiation. World J Urol 27:57–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Joseph D, Schmidt MD, Herbert J et al. (1976) Transverse colon conduit for supravesical urinary diversion. Urology 3:123–130

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kato H, Igawa Y, Nishizawa O (1999) Transverse colon pouch with total replacement of the ureter by reconfigured colon segment. J Urol 161:1902–1903

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kato H, Igawa Y, Komiyama I, Nishizawa O (2002) Continent urinary reservoir formation with transverse colon for patients with pelvic irradiation. Int J Urol 9:200–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Leissner J, Black P, Fisch M et al (2000) Colon pouch (Mainz pouch III) for continent urinary diversion after pelvic irradiation. Urology 56:798–802

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Leissner J, Fisch M, Hohenfellner R (2006) Colonic pouch (Mainz-pouch III) for continent urinary diversion. BJU Int 97:417–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Loening SA, Navarre RJ, Narayana AS, Culp DA (1982) Transverse colon conduit urinary diversion. J Urol 127:37–39

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mogg RA (1987) Urinary diversion using colon conduit. Br J Urol 39:687–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Morales P, Golimbu M (1975) Colonic urinary diversion: 10 years of experience. J Urol 113:302–307

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Morita K, Ishikawa R, Enami N et al (2001) Reconstruction of urinary tract utilizing transverse colon conduit for a cystectomized patient with post-ureterocutaneostomy complications and sigmoid colon cancer. Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi 76:199–202

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nelson JH (1969) Atlas of radical pelvic surgery. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp 181–191

  23. Nieuwenhuijzen JA, Vries RR de, Bex A et al (2008) Urinary diversions after cystectomy: the association of clinical factors, complications and functional results of four different diversions. Eur Urol 53:834–842 (discussion 842–834)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Raj GV, Peterson AC, Toh KL, Webster GD (2005) Outcomes following revisions and secondary implantation of the artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol 173:1242–1245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ravi R, Dewan AK, Pandey KK (1994) Transverse colon conduit urinary diversion in patients treated with very high dose pelvic irradiation. Br J Urol 73:51–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Schmidt JD, Buchsbaum HJ (1986) Transverse colon conduit diversion. Urol Clin North Am 13:233–239

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Schmidt JD, Buchsbaum HJ, Jacobo EC (1976) Transverse colon conduit for supravesical urinary tract diversion. Urology 8:542–546

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Schmidt JD, Buchsbaum HJ, Nachtsheim DA (1985) Long-term follow-up, further experience with and modifications of the transverse colon conduit in urinary tract diversion. Br J Urol 57:284–288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Schmidt JD, Hawtrey CE, Buchsbaum HJ (1975) Transverse colon conduit: a preferred method of urinary diversion for radiation-treated pelvic malignancies. J Urol 113:308–313

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Segreti EM, Morris M, Levenback C et al (1996) Transverse colon urinary diversion in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol 63:66–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Stein R, Schröder A, Hagen T, Thüoff JW (2008) Das Transversum Conduit- Eine Option zur inkontinenten Harnableitung. Urologe 47(Suppl 1):76

    Google Scholar 

  32. Stolzenburg JU, Schwalenberg T, Liatsikos EN et al (2007) Colon pouch (Mainz III) for continent urinary diversion. BJU Int 99:1473–1477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tolhurst SR, Rapp DE, O’Connor RC et al (2005) Complications after cystectomy and urinary diversion in patients previously treated for localized prostate cancer. Urology 66:824–829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wammack R, Wricke C, Hohenfellner R (2002) Long-term results of ileocecal continent urinary diversion in patients treated with and without previous pelvic irradiation. J Urol 167:2058–2062

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wilkin M, Horwitz G, Seetharam A et al (2005) Long-term complications associated with the Indiana pouch urinary diversion in patients with recurrent gynecologic cancers after high-dose radiation. Urol Oncol 23:12–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt für sich und seine Koautoren an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S.A. Ahyai FEBU.

Additional information

Dr. Sascha A. Ahyai und Khalid Sayedahmed waren zu gleichen Teilen an der Manuskripterstellung beteiligt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahyai, S., Sayedahmed, K., Engel, O. et al. Harnableitung und Dickdarm. Urologe 51, 937–946 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-012-2907-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-012-2907-5

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation