Skip to main content
Log in

Holmiumlaserablation der Prostata

Eine Alternative zum KTP

Holmium laser ablation of the prostate

An alternative to GreenLight photoselective vaporization of the prostate

  • Originalien
  • Published:
Der Urologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Ziele

Ablative Laserverfahren zur Therapie der benignen Prostataobstruktion (BPO) gewinnen aufgrund potenziell geringerer Komplikationsraten als quasi ambulante Therapieformen an Bedeutung. Ziel dieser prospektiven Phase-II-Studie war die Erfassung der Effektivität und der Komplikationen der Holmiumlaserablation der Prostata (HoLAP) im 1. postoperativen Jahr.

Material und Methoden

Von 06/2006 bis 12/2007 wurden 86 von 343 konsekutiven Patienten mit BPO (IPSS>10) mit dem Versapulse®-100-W-Laser (Lumenis®) mit 2,0 J/50 Hz oder 3,2 J/25 Hz behandelt. PSA, Qmax, IPSS („International Prostate Symptom Score“), Prostatavolumen und Restharn wurden prä- und postoperativ prospektiv erfasst. Das mediane Follow-up beträgt 8 (3–21) Monate.

Ergebnisse

Das Alter lag bei 71 (9–135) Jahren. Die Operationszeit betrug 77,5 min. Es gab nur eine substitutionsbedürftige Blutung. In 14/86 Fällen (16%) wurde die HoLAP mit einer transurethralen Resektion der Prostata (TURP) kombiniert. Kurzzeitige dysurische Beschwerden traten bei 26,7% der befragten Patienten auf. Die Krankenhausverweildauer lag in den meisten Fällen <48 h. IPSS, QoL, Qmax, PSA, RH und Volumen haben sich nach 3 Monaten signifikant verbessert, alle Parameter bleiben nach 12 Monaten unverändert. Die Reoperationsrate in 12 Monaten beträgt 6,8%.

Schlussfolgerung

Der Vorteil der HoLAP gegenüber der TURP ist die sehr geringe Blutungsrate und damit kurze Krankenhausverweildauer und mögliche ambulante Therapie. Besonders Patienten mit einer Prostata <50 ml profitieren von der HoLAP. Postoperative Dysurien sind der Symptomatik nach TURP vergleichbar. Langzeitergebnisse müssen die geringe Reoperationsrate bestätigen.

Abstract

Introduction

Ablative laser methods for treating benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) have gained importance because of potentially lower complication rates than outpatient therapy methods. The aim of this prospective phase II study was to record the effectiveness and complications of holmium laser ablation of the prostate (HoLAP) in the first postoperative year.

Material and methods

June 2006 to December 2007, 86 of 343 consecutive patients with BPO [International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) >10] were treated with the VersaPulse 100-W laser (Lumenis), 2.0 J/50 Hz or 3.2 J/25 Hz. Preoperative and postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA), peak urinary flow rate (Qmax), IPSS, prostate gland volume, and postvoid urine volume were prospectively measured. The median follow-up time was 8 months (3–21).

Results

Median patient age was 71 (50–83) years, and mean operating time was 77.5 (9–135) min. There was only one case of significant bleeding. In 14 of 86 cases (16%), HoLAP was combined with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Short-term voiding complaints were expressed by 26.7% of the questioned patients. The length of hospital stay was in most cases <48 h. IPSS, Qmax, PSA, postvoid urine, gland volumes, and quality of life improved significantly after 3 months, and all parameters remained unchanged after 12 months. The reoperation rate within 12 months was 6.8%.

Conclusions

The advantage of HoLAP over TURP is the very low bleeding rate and thus a shorter hospital stay and possible outpatient therapy. In particular, patients with prostate gland volume <50 ml profit from HoLAP. Postoperative voiding complaints are comparable to those with TURP. Long-term results are needed to confirm the low reoperation rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Muschter R (2003) free beam and contact laser coagulation. J Endourol 17(8): 579–585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gilling PJ, Cass CB, Malcolm AR et al (1995) Combination holmium and Nd: Yag laser ablation of the prostate initial clinical experience. J Endourol 9: 151–153

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gilling PJ, Fraundorfer MR (1998) Holmium laser prostatectomy a technique in evolution. Curr Opin Urol 8(1): 11–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilson LC, Gilling PJ (2005) From coagulation to enucleation the use of lasers in surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Nat Clin Pract Urol 2(9): 443–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuntz R, Lehrich K, Fayad A (2000) Holmium laser lithotripsy (HoLL) of ureteral calculi. Can J Urol 7(1): 952–956

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kabalin JN, Gilling PJ, Fraundorfer MR (1998) Application of the holmium:YAG laser for prostatectomy. J Clin Laser Med Surg 16(1): 21–27

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bagley D, Das A (2001) Endourologic ese of the holmium laser. Teton NewMedia, Jackson, WY

  8. Gilling PJ, Cass CB, Cresswell MD et al (1996) The use of holmium laser in treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Endourol 10: 459–461

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuntz RM (2006) Current role of lasers in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Eur Urol 49(6): 961–969

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tan AHH, Gilling PJ, Kennett KM et al (2003) Long-term results of high-power holmium laser vaporization (ablation) of the prostate. BJU Intern 92: 707–709

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mottet N, Anidjar M, Bourdon O et al (1999) A randomized comparison of transurethral electroresection and holmium:YAG laser vaporization for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Endourol 13: 127–130

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McConnell JD, Barry MJ, Bruskewitz RC et al (1994) Clinical practice guideline for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Diagnosis and treatment. Rockville, Maryland Agency for health care policy and research. Public Health Service, Rockville, Maryland, pp 94–582

  13. Mebust WK, Holtgrewe HL, Cockett ATK, Peters PC (2002) Transurethral prostatectomy immediate and postoperative complications. A cooperative study of 13 participating institutions evaluating 3,885 patients. J Urol 167(2 Pt 2): 999–1003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kumars SM (2007) Rapid communication holmium laser ablation of large prostate glands an endourologic alternative to open prostatectomy. J Endo Urol 21(6): 659–662

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lourenco T, Pickard R, Vale L et al (2008) Alternative approaches to endoscopic ablation for benign enlargement of the prostate: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 337: 449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Seki N, Naito S (2008) Holmium laser for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Curr Opin Urol 18(1): 41–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenskonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Richter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richter, M., Schwarz, J., De Geeter, P. et al. Holmiumlaserablation der Prostata. Urologe 48, 291–295 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-008-1926-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-008-1926-8

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation