Skip to main content
Log in

Salvagestrategien nach Komplikationen der Hypospadiechirurgie

Salvage strategies after complications of hypospadias repair

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Urologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Trotz verbesserter Technik und technischer Ausstattung liegt die Komplikationsrate bei Hypospadiekorrekturen zwischen 20 und 30%. Verschiedene Aspekte wie Verbandstechnik und andere sind wesentlich für die Prävention von Komplikationen.

Frühkomplikationen beinhalten v. a. Blutungen, Hämatome und Infekte. Spätkomplikationen sind Fisteln, Meatusstenosen, Hautnekrosen, Restverkrümmungen, Harnröhrenstrikturen, Haare in der Urethra bis hin zu den Hypospadiekrüppeln. Es sollte eine exakte präoperative Diagnostik erfolgen. Verschiedene operative Techniken kommen in Betracht bis hin zur Verwendung von Meshgraft oder Fremdmaterial. Oft sind mehrzeitige Operationen notwendig. Die Operation von ausgeprägten Komplikationen ist ein anspruchsvoller rekonstruktiver Eingriff, der dem erfahrenen Operateur vorbehalten sein sollte.

Abstract

The complication rate of hypospadias repair still ranges between 20 and 30%, although operative skills and technical devices have improved. Different aspects like dressing are important for prevention of complications.

Early complications are bleeding, hematoma, and infection. Late complications are fistulas, meatal stenosis, partial and complete breakdown, persisting curvature, a hairy urethra, and hypospadias cripples. Detailed preoperative diagnostics are important. There are several operative techniques that can be used for repair including the use of mesh graft or foreign material. Two or multiple stages are often needed. The surgery to correct complications after hypospadias repair is a challenge, which should only be done by an experienced surgeon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6

Literatur

  1. Hansson E, Becker M, Aberg M, Svensson H (2007) Analysis of complications after repair of hypospadias. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 41: 120–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Snyder CL, Evangelidis A, Hansen G et al. (2005) Management of complications after hypospadias repair. Urology 65: 782–785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Devine CJ Jr, Franz JP, Horton CE (1978) Evaluation and treatment of patients with failed hypospadias repair. J Urol 119: 223–226

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Baskin LS, Duckett JW, Ueokat K et al. (1994) Changing concepts of hypospadias curvature lead to more onlay island flap procedures. J Urol 151: 191–196

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Elbakry A, Shamaa M, Al-Atrash G (1998) An axially vascularized meatal-based flap for the repair of hypospadias. Br J Urol 82: 698–703

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. European Association of Urology (2001) Guidelines on the Management of urinary and male genital tract infections. EAU, Arnheim, Niederlande

  7. Venn SN, Mundy AR (1998) Urethroplasty for balanitis xerotica obliterans. Br J Urol 81: 735–737

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Beuke M, Riechardt S, Fisch M (2007) Complications after surgery of the external genitalia in children with BXO, Poster ESPU Brugge

  9. Retik AB, Keating M, Mandell J (1988) Complications of hypospadias repair. Urol Clin North Am 15: 223–236

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Landau EH, Gofrit ON, Meretyk S et al. (2003) Outcome analysis of tunica vaginalis flap for the correction of recurrent urethrcutaneous fistula in children. J Urol 170: 1596–1599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Duel BP, Barthold JS, Gonzalea R (1998) Management of urethral strictures after hypospadias repair. J Urol 160: 170–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wessells H, McAninch JW (1998) Current controversies in anterior urethral stricture repair: Free-graft versus pedicled skin-flap reconstruction. World J Urol 16: 175–180

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Barbagli G, Selli C et al. (1996) Dorsal free graft urethroplasty. J Urol 155: 123–126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schreiter F (1997) The two stage meshgraft urethroplasty using split-thickness skin. Atlas Urol Clin North Am 5: 104–108

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brakka A (1995) Hypospadia repair: the two stage alternative. Br J Urol 76: 31–41

    Google Scholar 

  16. Horton CE, Devine CJ Jr (1970) A one-stage repair for hypospadias cripples. Plast Reconstr Surg 45: 425–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Baskin LS, Duckett JW (1994) Mucosal grafts in hypospadias and stricture management. AUA Update Series 13: 270–275

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ahmed S, Gough DC (1997) Buccal mucosa graft for secondary hypospadias repair and urethral replacement. Br J Urol 80: 328–330

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ghali AM, el-Malki T, Ibrahim AH (1999) One-stage hypospadias repair. Experience with 544 cases. Eur Urol 36: 436–442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Amukele SA, Stock JA, Hanna MK (2005) Management and outcome of complex hypospadias repairs. J Urol 174: 1540–1543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Snodgrass W, Koyle M, Manzoni G et al. (1996) Tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair: Results of a multicenter experience. J Urol: 156: 839–841

  22. Elicevik M, Tireli G, Demirali O et al. (2007) Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for hypospadias reoperations in 100 patients. Int Urol Nephrol (in press)

  23. Cecil AB (1932) Surgery of hypospadias and epispadias in the male. J Urol 27: 507

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Beuke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beuke, M., Fisch, M. Salvagestrategien nach Komplikationen der Hypospadiechirurgie. Urologe 46, 1670–1675 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-007-1588-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-007-1588-y

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation