Skip to main content
Log in

Was gibt’s Neues beim Harnblasenkarzinom?

The latest news on bladder cancer

  • AUO
  • Published:
Der Urologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Eine Prüfung der aktuellen Literatur erbringt neue wissenschaftliche Erkenntnisse zur Diagnostik und Prognose und für neue molekulare Zielstrukturen. Die neue WHO-Klassifikation verfeinert unsere Stadieneinteilung und beeinflusst die Behandlungsoptionen des Blasenkarzinoms. Internationale klinische Daten zeigen neue Möglichkeiten, das individuelle Risiko bzgl. Remission oder Progression zu berechnen. Die systematische Genclusteranalyse definiert Multimarkerpanels, die als zuverlässige Prädikatoren für die Überlebenswahrscheinlichkeit dienen können. Die Entdeckung neuer Signalpfade beim Blasenkarzinom führen zu neuen Zielmolekülen für innovative Therapien.

Abstract

A review of the current literature provides new scientific insights into the diagnosis, prognosis and novel molecular targets for bladder cancer. The new WHO classification refines our staging system and influences treatment options. International clinical databases provide new tools for calculating the individual risk for bladder cancer recurrence and progression. Systematic gene cluster analysis defines multimarker panels that can serve as robust predictors of outcome. Discoveries of new signaling pathways in bladder cancer are leading to novel molecular targets for innovative therapies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Aaboe M, Birkenkamp-Demtroder K, Wiuf C et al. (2006) SOX4 expression in bladder carcinoma: clinical aspects and in vitro functional characterization. Cancer Res 66: 3434–3442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Advanced Bladder Cancer Meta-Analysis Collaboration (2005) Adjuvant chemotherapy in invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Eur Urol 48(2): 189–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Busch C, Algaba F (2002) The WHO/ISUP 1998 and WHO 1999 systems for malignancy grading of bladder cancer. Scientific foundation and translation to one another and previous systems. Virchows Arch 441: 105–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Copp HL, Chin JL, Conaway M, Theodorescu D (2006) Prospective evaluation of the prognostic relevance of molecular staging for urothelial carcinoma. Cancer 107: 60–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Eble JE, Sauter G, Epstein IJ, Sesterhenn IA (eds) (2004) Tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs, WHO classification of tumours. IARC Press, Lyon

  6. Fahmy NM, Mahmud S, Aprikian AG (2006) Delay in the surgical treatment of bladder cancer and survival: systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 50(6): 1176–1182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fradet Y, Aprikian A, Dranitsaris G et al. (2006) Does prolonging the time to bladder cancer surgery affect long-term cancer control: a systematic review of the literature. Can J Urol 13 (Suppl 3): 37–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Furey TS, Cristianini N, Duffy N et al. (2000) Support vector machine classification and validation of cancer tissue samples using microarray expression data. Bioinformatics 16(10): 906–914

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hautmann RE, Gschwend JE, Petriconi RC de et al. (2006) Cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: results of a surgery only series in the neobladder era. J Urol 176: 486–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. International Bladder Cancer Nomogram Consortium, Bochner BH, Kattan MW, Vora KC (2006) Postoperative nomogram predicting risk of recurrence after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol 24: 3967–3972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kosugi M, Miyajima A, Kikuchi E et al. (2006) Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist candesartan as an angiogenic inhibitor in a xenograft model of bladder cancer. Clin Cancer Res 12: 2888–2893

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee CT, Madii R, Daignault S et al. (2006) Cystectomy delay more than 3 months from initial bladder cancer diagnosis results in decreased disease specific and overall survival. J Urol 175: 1262–1267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Osman I, Bajorin DF, Sun TT et al. (2006) Novel blood biomarkers of human urinary bladder cancer. Clin Cancer Res 12: 3374–3380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ramesh N, Ge Y, Ennist DL et al. (2006) CG0070, a conditionally replicating granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor–armed oncolytic adenovirus for the treatment of bladder cancer. Clin Cancer Res 12: 305–313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sanchez-Carbayo M, Socci ND, Lozano J et al. (2006) Defining molecular profiles of poor outcome in patients with invasive bladder cancer using oligonucleotide microarrays. J Clin Oncol 24: 778–789

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Studer UE, Burkhard FC, Schumacher M et al. (2006) Twenty years experience with an ileal orthotopic low pressure bladder substitute–lessons to be learned. J Urol 176: 161–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sylvester RJ (2006) Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: A combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol 49: 466–477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Urakami S, Shiina H, Enokida H et al. (2006) Epigenetic inactivation of Wnt inhibitory factor-1 plays an important role in bladder cancer through aberrant canonical Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. Clin Cancer Res 12: 383–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Urakami S, Shiina H, Enokida H et al. (2006) Combination analysis of hypermethylated Wnt-antagonist family genes as a novel epigenetic biomarker panel for bladder cancer detection. Clin Cancer Res 12: 2109–2116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu X, Kakehi Y, Zeng Y et al. (2005) Uroplakin II as a promising marker for molecular diagnosis of nodal metastases from bladder cancer: comparison with cytokeratin 20. J Urol 174: 2138–2142

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Es besteht kein Interessenkonflikt. Der korrespondierende Autor versichert, dass keine Verbindungen mit einer Firma, deren Produkt in dem Artikel genannt ist, oder einer Firma, die ein Konkurrenzprodukt vertreibt, bestehen. Die Präsentation des Themas ist unabhängig und die Darstellung der Inhalte produktneutral.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Retz.

Additional information

Präsentation im Rahmen des Schlussforums der Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Urologie, Hamburg 2006

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Retz, M., Lehmann, J., Nawroth, R. et al. Was gibt’s Neues beim Harnblasenkarzinom?. Urologe 46, 727–732 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-007-1370-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-007-1370-1

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation