Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ureterorenoskopie: Gestern, heute und morgen

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Urologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Abdel-Razzak OM, Bagley DH (1992) Clinical experience with flexible ureteropyeloscopy. J Urol 148: 1788

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aghamir SK, Mohseni MG, Ardestani A (2003) Treatment of ureteral calculi with ballistic lithotripsy. J Endourol 17: 887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bagley DH, Kuo RL, Zeltser IS (2004) An update on ureteroscopic instrumentation for the treatment of urolithiasis. Curr Opin Urol 14: 99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bush IM, Goldberg E, Javadpour N et al. (1970) Ureteroscopy and renoscopy: a preliminary report. Chic Med Sch Q 30: 46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chiu KY, Cai Y, Marcovich R et al. (2004) Are new-generation flexible ureteroscopes better than their predecessors? BJU Int 93: 115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chow GK, Patterson DE, Blute ML et al. (2003) Ureteroscopy: effect of technology and technique on clinical practice. J Urol 170: 99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Collins JW, Keeley FX Jr, Timoney A (2004) Cost analysis of flexible ureterorenoscopy. BJU Int 93: 1023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Conlin MJ, Marberger M, Bagley DH (1997) Ureteroscopy. Development and instrumentation. Urol Clin North Am 24: 25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dretler SP, Watson G, Parrish JA et al. (1987) Pulsed dye laser fragmentation of ureteral calculi: initial clinical experience. J Urol 137: 386

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dretler SP, Bhatta KM (1991) Clinical experience with high power (140 mj.), large fiber (320 micron) pulsed dye laser lithotripsy. J Urol 146: 1228

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fong YK, Ho SH, Peh OH et al. (2004) Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and intracorporeal lithotripsy for proximal ureteric calculi--a comparative assessment of efficacy and safety. Ann Acad Med Singapore 33: 80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fuchs GJ, Yurkanin JP (2003) Endoscopic surgery for renal calculi. Curr Opin Urol 13: 243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fuchs GJ (2006) Milestones in endoscope design for minimally invasive urologic surgery: the sentinel role of a pioneer. Surg Endosc 20(Suppl 2): 493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Goodman TM (1977) Ureteroscopy with pediatric cystoscope in adults. Urology 9: 394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Grasso M (1996) Experience with the holmium laser as an endoscopic lithotrite. Urology 48: 199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Grasso M, Bagley D (1994) A 7.5/8.2 F actively deflectable, flexible ureteroscope: a new device for both diagnostic and therapeutic upper urinary tract endoscopy. Urology 43: 435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Honeck P, Hacker A, Alken P et al. (2006) Shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for distal ureteral calculi: a prospective study. Urol Res 1

    Google Scholar 

  18. Huffman JL, Bagley DH, Schoenberg HW et al. (1083) Transurethral removal of large ureteral and renal pelvic calculi using ureteroscopic ultrasonic lithotripsy. J Urol 130: 31

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kavoussi L, Clayman RV, Basler J (1989) Flexible, actively deflectable fiberoptic ureteronephroscopy. J Urol 142: 949

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Knoll T, Trojan L, Haecker A et al. (2005) Validation of computer-based training in ureterorenoscopy. BJU Int 95: 1276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Landman J, Lee DI, Lee C et al. (2003) Evaluation of overall costs of currently available small flexible ureteroscopes. Urology 62: 218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lyon ES, Kyker JS, Schoenberg HW (1978) Transurethral ureteroscopy in women: a ready addition to the urological armamentarium. J Urol 119: 35

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lyon ES, Banno JJ, Schoenberg HW (1979) Transurethral ureteroscopy in men using juvenile cystoscopy equipment. J Urol 122: 152

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Michel MS, Kohrmann KU, Alken P (2000) Update on contact lithotripsy. Curr Opin Urol 10: 571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Michel MS, Knoll T, Kohrmann KU et al. (2002) The URO Mentor: development and evaluation of a new computer-based interactive training system for virtual life-like simulation of diagnostic and therapeutic endourological procedures. BJU Int 89: 174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pearle MS, Nadler R, Bercowsky E et al. (2001) Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for management of distal ureteral calculi. J Urol 166: 1255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Perez-Castro Ellendt E, Martinez-Pineiro JA (1980) Transurethral ureteroscopy. A current urological procedure. Arch Esp Urol 33: 445

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Perez-Castro Ellendt E, Martinez-Pineiro JA, Beneitez M et al. (1984) Transurethral ureter-renoscopy. Past, present and future. Arch Esp Urol 37(Suppl 2): 725

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Peschel R, Janetschek G, Bartsch G (1999) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for distal ureteral calculi: a prospective randomized study. J Urol 162: 1909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Shvarts O, Perry KT, Goff B et al. (2004) Improved functional deflection with a dual-deflection flexible ureteroscope. J Endourol 18: 141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sofer M, Watterson JD, Wollin TA et al. (2002) Holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for upper urinary tract calculi in 598 patients. J Urol 167: 31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Stoller ML, Wolf JS Jr, Hofmann R et al. (1992) Ureteroscopy without routine balloon dilation: an outcome assessment. J Urol 147: 1238

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Takagi T, Go T, Takayasu H et al. (1971) Fiberoptic pyeloureteroscope. Surgery 70: 661

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Teichman JM, Vassar GJ, Glickman RD (1998) Holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet lithotripsy efficiency varies with stone composition. Urology 52: 392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Troy AJ, Anagnostou T, Tolley DA (2004) Flexible upper tract endoscopy. BJU Int 93: 671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Turk TM, Jenkins AD (1999) A comparison of ureteroscopy to in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of distal ureteral calculi. J Urol 161: 45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wu CF, Shee JJ, Lin WY et al. (2004) Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones. J Urol 172: 1899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zheng W, Denstedt JD (2000) Intracorporeal lithotripsy. Update on technology. Urol Clin North Am 27: 301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Es besteht kein Interessenkonflikt. Der korrespondierende Autor versichert, dass keine Verbindungen mit einer Firma, deren Produkt in dem Artikel genannt ist, oder einer Firma, die ein Konkurrenzprodukt vertreibt, bestehen. Die Präsentation des Themas ist unabhängig und die Darstellung der Inhalte produktneutral.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Urologische Klinik, Klinikum Mannheim gGmbH, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1–3, 68167, Mannheim

    T. Knoll & P. Alken

Authors
  1. T. Knoll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. Alken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Knoll.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knoll, T., Alken, P. Ureterorenoskopie: Gestern, heute und morgen. Urologe 45 (Suppl 4), 185–186 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-006-1183-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-006-1183-7

Search

Navigation