Skip to main content
Log in

Technik der nerverhaltenden radikalen retropubischen Prostatektomie

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Urologe, Ausgabe A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zuammenfassung

Die offene radikale retropubische Prostatektomie ist die am häufigsten angewandte Technik der operativen Therapie des klinisch lokalisierten Prostatakarzinoms. Die wichtigsten Elemente zum Erreichen überzeugender funktioneller Ergebnisse liegen hierbei in der subtilen sphinkterschonenden Umsteckung des distalen dorsalen Venenplexus sowie in der schonenden Präparation des Gefäßnervenbündels. Neben einer detaillierten Beschreibung der operativen Technik werden in diesem Artikel auch Vorgehensweisen zur Patienten- und Tumorselektion zur Indikationsstellung einer nervschonenden radikalen Prostatektomie vorgestellt.

Abstract

Open radical retropubic prostatectomy is the most popular operative technique for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. Key elements to achieve convincing functional results are a sphincter-preserving ligation of the distal part of Santorini’s plexus and the subtle preparation of the neurovascular bundle. This article gives a detailed description of our operative technique. Furthermore, a strategy for patient selection and tumor selection for the indication of a nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy is suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5

Literatur

  1. Augustin H, Hammerer P, Graefen M et al. (2003) Intraoperative and perioperative morbidity of contemporary radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1243 patients: results of a single center between 1999 and 2002. Eur Urol 43/2: 113–118

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cangiano TG, Litwin MS, Naitoh J, Dorey F, de Kernion JB (1999) Intraoperative frozen section monitoring of nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 162: 655–658

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eastham JA, Kattan MW, Rogers E et al. (1996) Risk factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 156/5: 1707–1713

    Google Scholar 

  4. Graefen M, Haese A, Pichlmeier U et al. (2001) A validated strategy for side specific prediction of organ confined prostate cancer: a tool to select for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. J Urol 165/3: 857–863

    Google Scholar 

  5. Michl U, Graefen M, Noldus J, Eggert T, Huland H (2003) Funktionelle Ergebnisse unterschiedlicher Operationstechniken der radikalen Prostatektomie. Urologe A 42/9: 1196–1202

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Gendrano N (2002) The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a state-of-the-science review. Int J Impot Res 14/4: 226–244

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt:

Keine Angaben

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Graefen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Graefen, M., Huland, H. Technik der nerverhaltenden radikalen retropubischen Prostatektomie. Urologe [A] 43, 156–159 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-003-0525-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-003-0525-y

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation