Skip to main content
Log in

Chemotherapie des Harnblasenkarzinoms

Systemtherapie mit reduzierter Toxizität

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Urologe, Ausgabe A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die Polychemotherapie des Harnblasenkarzinoms nach dem MVAC-Schema war über viele Jahre als Standard beim metastasierten oder lokal fortgeschrittenen Harnblasenkarzinom akzeptiert. Da lediglich ein geringer Prozentsatz der Patienten mit fortgeschrittener Erkrankung durch die Chemotherapie geheilt wird, ist eine Abwägung von Nutzen und Risiko bedeutend. Ziel ist es, Patienten zu identifizieren, die auf eine Chemotherapie vermutlich ansprechen. Gleichzeitig muss die Toxizität, insbesondere bei geschwächten oder älteren Patienten, berücksichtigt werden.

Durch die Einführung innovativer Substanzen und Substanzkombinationen in die Behandlung des fortgeschrittenen Harnblasenkarzinoms haben sich vielversprechende neue Möglichkeiten eröffnet. Insbesondere hat die gute Wirksamkeit und Verträglichkeit des synthetischen Nukleosidanalogons Gemcitabine zu einer erweiterten Indikationsstellung, auch beim älteren Patienten, geführt. Bei dieser Patientengruppe können Monotherapien mit Gemcitabine aber auch mit Paclitaxel sowie Kombinationen mit Cisplatin, Carboplatin oder Methotrexat, mit vertretbarem Nebenwirkungsprofil durchgeführt werden.

Abstract

For many years, MVAC chemotherapy has been the standard treatment for patients with advanced bladder cancer. Since only a small proportion of patients with advanced disease may be cured by chemotherapy, the expected toxicity profile has to be balanced against the clinical benefit. It is of importance to select patients who may probably respond to chemotherapy.

The treatment-associated toxicity needs to be considered especially in unfit and elderly patients. The introduction of innovative new compounds and combinations for the treatment of advanced bladder cancer has opened new avenues. In particular, the good activity of the synthetic nucleoside analogue gemcitabine has improved chemotherapeutic approaches for older patients. For this group of patients, monotherapy with gemcitabine or paclitaxel as well as combinations with cisplatin, carboplatin, or methotrexate is feasible with acceptable side effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Jemal A, Thomas A, Murray T, Thun M (2002) Cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 52: 23–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Skinner DG, Daniels JR, Russell CA et al. (1991) The role of adjuvant chemotherapy following cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer: a prospective comparative trial. J Urol 145: 459–464

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stöckle M, Meyenburg W, Wellek S et al. (1995) Adjuvant polychemotherapy of nonorgan-confined bladder cancer after radical cystectomy revisited: long-term results of a controlled prospective study and further clinical experience. J Urol 153: 47–52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Freiha F, Reese J, Torti FM (1996) A randomised trial of radical cystectomy versus radical cystectomy plus cisplatin, vinblastine and methotrexate chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. J Urol 155: 495–500

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sternberg CN, Yagoda A, Scher HI et al. (1985) Preliminary results of M-VAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin) for transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium. J Urol 133: 403–407

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sternberg CN, Yagoda A, Scher HI et al. (1989) Methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin for advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium. Efficacy and patterns of response and relapse. Cancer 64: 2448–2458

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bajorin DF, Dodd PM, Mazumdar M et al. (1999) Long-term survival in metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma and prognostic factors predicting outcome of therapy. J Clin Oncol 17: 3173–3181

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Scher HI, Norton L (1992) Chemotherapy for urothelial tract malignancies: breaking the deadlock. Semin Surg Oncol 8: 316–341

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stadler WM, Kuzel T, Roth B, Raghavan D, Dorr FA (1997) Phase II study of single-agent gemcitabine in previously untreated patients with metastatic urothelial cancer. J Clin Oncol 15: 3394–3398

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moore MJ, Tannock IF, Ernst DS, Huan S, Murray N (1997) Gemcitabine: a promising new agent in the treatment of advanced urothelial cancer. J Clin Oncol 15: 3441–3445

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lorusso V, Pollera CF, Antimi M et al. (1998) A phase II study of gemcitabine in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract previously treated with platinum. Italian Co-operative Group on Bladder Cancer. Eur J Cancer 34: 1208–1212

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Roth BJ, Dreicer R, Einhorn LH et al. (1994) Significant activity of paclitaxel in advanced transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelium: a phase II trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 12: 2264–2270

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dreicer R, Gustin DM, See WA, Williams RD (1996) Paclitaxel in advanced urothelial carcinoma: its role in patients with renal insufficiency and as salvage therapy. J Urol 156: 1606–1608

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. de Wit R, Kruit WH, Stoter G, de Boer M, Kerger J, Verweij J (1998) Docetaxel (Taxotere): an active agent in metastatic urothelial cancer; results of a phase II study in non-chemotherapy-pretreated patients. Br J Cancer 78: 1342–1345

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Waxman J, Barton C (1993) Carboplatin-based chemotherapy for bladder cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 19 (Suppl C): 21–25

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yagoda A (1987) Chemotherapy of urothelial tract tumors. Cancer 60 (Suppl 3): 574–585

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. von der Maase H, Hansen SW, Roberts JT et al. (2000). Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in advanced or metastatic bladder cancer: results of a large, randomized, multinational, multicenter, phase III study. J Clin Oncol 18: 3068–3077

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vaughn DJ, Malkowicz SB, Zoltick B et al. (1998) Paclitaxel plus carboplatin in advanced carcinoma of the urothelium: an active and tolerable outpatient regimen. J Clin Oncol 16: 255–260

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zielinski CC, Schnack B, Grbovic M et al. (1998) Paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer: results of a phase II trial. Br J Cancer 78: 370–374

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Small EJ, Lew D, Redman BG et al. (2000) Southwest Oncology Group Study of paclitaxel and carboplatin for advanced transitional-cell carcinoma: the importance of survival as a clinical trial end point. J Clin Oncol 18: 2537–2544

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Carles J, Nogue M, Domenech M et al. (2000) Carboplatin-gemcitabine treatment of patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder and impaired renal function. Oncology 59: 24–27

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bellmunt J, de Wit R, Albanell J, Baselga J (2001) A feasibility study of carboplatin with fixed dose of gemcitabine in "unfit" patients with advanced bladder cancer. Eur J Cancer 37: 2212–2215

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. E. Gschwend.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gschwend, J.E., Simon, J., Volkmer, B. et al. Chemotherapie des Harnblasenkarzinoms. Urologe [A] 42, 1445–1449 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-003-0451-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-003-0451-z

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation