Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Frakturen der Halswirbelsäule und Bandscheibenläsionen

Cervical fractures and disc lesions

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Radiologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Problem

Der Kopf macht etwa 8 % des Körpergewichts eines Erwachsenen aus, wird jedoch nur durch die Halswirbelsäule (HWS) und relativ schwache Ligamente stabilisiert. Bei Kindern ist dieses Verhältnis sogar noch ungünstiger. In diesem Artikel werden die verschiedenen Klassifikationen der Wirbelsäulenverletzungen aufgezeigt. Zusätzlich wird auf die Läsionen der Bänder, Bandscheiben und mögliche Verletzungen der A. vertebralis eingegangen.

Empfehlung für die Praxis

Bei Rasanztraumata muss neben den klassischen Frakturen eine Verletzung der A. vertebralis ausgeschlossen werden. Ebenso muss die Intaktheit des Bandapparats überprüft werden, um die Stabilität der HWS beurteilen zu können.

Abstract

Clinical issue

The head accounts for about 8% of the total body weight, and only modest ligaments stabilize the cervical spine. In children, the ratio head weight/body mass is even worse, so not surprisingly injuries to the cervical spine are common. This article reviews the most common classifications of different cervical fractures. In addition, ruptures of the ligaments and lesions to the intervertebral discs and the vertebral arteries are discussed.

Practical recommendations

In high velocity trauma, it is vital to exclude lesions to the vertebral arteries and the cervical ligaments to prevent/minimize further harm and to accurately assess the stability of the cervical spine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6

Literatur

  1. Anderson LD, D’Alonzo RT (1974) Fractures of the odontoid process of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:1663–1674

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson PA, Montesano PX (1988) Morphology and treatment of occipital condyle fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13:731–736

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Biffl WL, Cothren CC, Moore EE et al (2009) Western trauma association critical decisions in trauma: screening for and treatment of blunt cerebrovascular injuries. J Trauma 67:1150–1153

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Butler JS, Dolan RT, Burbridge M et al (2010) The long-term functional outcome of type II odontoid fractures managed non-operatively. Eur Spine J 19:1635–1642

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang YM, Kim G, Peri N et al (2017) Diagnostic utility of increased STIR signal in the posterior atlanto-occipital and atlantoaxial membrane complex on MRI in acute C1-C2 fracture. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38:1820–1825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Denis F (1983) The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 8:817–831

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fourman MS, Shaw JD, Vaudreuil NJ et al (2019) Cervical spine fractures: who really needs CT angiography? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 44:1661–1667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Frost BA, Camarero-Espinosa S, Foster EJ (2019) Materials for the spine: anatomy, problems, and solutions. Materials (Basel) 12:253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. James R, Nasmyth-Jones R (1992) The occurrence of cervical fractures in victims of judicial hanging. Forensic Sci Int 54:81–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Khanpara S, Ruiz-Pardo D, Spence SC et al (2020) Incidence of cervical spine fractures on CT: a study in a large level I trauma center. Emerg Radiol 27:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lestini WF, Wiesel SW (1989) The pathogenesis of cervical spondylosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 239:69–93

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liu C, Kuang L, Wang L et al (2014) Management of combination fractures of the atlas and axis: a report of four cases and literature review. Int J Clin Exp Med 7:2074–2080

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lomoschitz FM, Blackmore CC, Mirza SK et al (2002) Cervical spine injuries in patients 65 years old and older: epidemiologic analysis regarding the effects of age and injury mechanism on distribution, type, and stability of injuries. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:573–577

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Matsumoto M, Fujimura Y, Suzuki N et al (1998) MRI of cervical intervertebral discs in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:19–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Olerud C, Andersson S, Svensson B et al (1999) Cervical spine fractures in the elderly: factors influencing survival in 65 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 70:509–513

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Panjabi M, White A 3rd (1988) Biomechanics of nonacute cervical spinal cord trauma. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13:838–842

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Perez-Orribo L, Kalb S, Snyder LA et al (2016) Comparison of CT versus MRI measurements of transverse atlantal ligament integrity in craniovertebral junction injuries. Part 2: a new CT-based alternative for assessing transverse ligament integrity. J Neurosurg Spine 24:903–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Perez-Orribo L, Snyder LA, Kalb S et al (2016) Comparison of CT versus MRI measurements of transverse atlantal ligament integrity in craniovertebral junction injuries. Part 1: a clinical study. J Neurosurg Spine 24:897–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schneider RC, Livingston KE, Cave AJ et al (1965) „Hangman’s fracture“ of the cervical spine. J Neurosurg 22:141–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Suzuki A, Daubs MD, Hayashi T et al (2018) Patterns of cervical disc degeneration: analysis of magnetic resonance imaging of over 1000 symptomatic subjects. Global Spine J 8:254–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Traynelis VC, Marano GD, Dunker RO et al (1986) Traumatic atlanto-occipital dislocation. Case report. J Neurosurg 65:863–870

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Watanabe M, Sakai D, Yamamoto Y et al (2010) Upper cervical spine injuries: age-specific clinical features. J Orthop Sci 15:485–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Woods RO, Inceoglu S, Akpolat YT et al (2018) C1 lateral mass displacement and transverse atlantal ligament failure in jefferson’s fracture: a biomechanical study of the „rule of spence“. Neurosurgery 82:226–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yoon SY, Park SH, Hwang JH et al (2016) Multiple cerebral infarctions due to unilateral traumatic vertebral artery dissection after cervical fractures. Korean J Neurotrauma 12:34–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Armin Bachhuber.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

A. Bachhuber gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autoren keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Additional information

figure qr

QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bachhuber, A. Frakturen der Halswirbelsäule und Bandscheibenläsionen. Radiologe 61, 714–719 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-021-00880-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-021-00880-w

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation