Zusammenfassung
Klinisches Problem
Hybridbildgebung ermöglicht es durch die Kombination anatomischer und molekularer Informationen, zellulären Metabolismus ortsgenau darzustellen. Die Fortschritte in der künstlichen Intelligenz (KI) bieten neue Methoden zur Verarbeitung und Auswertung dieser Daten.
Methodische Innovationen
Diese Übersichtsarbeit fasst aktuelle Entwicklungen und Anwendungen von KI-Methoden in der Hybridbildgebung zusammen. Es werden sowohl Anwendungen in der Bildverarbeitung als auch Methoden zur krankheitsbezogenen Auswertung vorgestellt und diskutiert.
Material und Methoden
Die Arbeit beruht auf einer selektiven Literaturrecherche in den Suchmaschinen PubMed und arXiv.
Bewertung
Aktuell gibt es nur wenige KI-Anwendungen, die hybride Bilddaten verwenden, und noch keine Anwendungen, die im klinischen Alltag etabliert sind. Obwohl sich erste vielversprechende Ansätze zeigen, müssen diese noch prospektiv evaluiert werden. In Zukunft werden KI-Anwendungen Radiologen und Nuklearmediziner bei Diagnostik und Therapie unterstützen.
Abstract
Clinical issue
Hybrid imaging enables the precise visualization of cellular metabolism by combining anatomical and metabolic information. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) offer new methods for processing and evaluating this data.
Methodological innovations
This review summarizes current developments and applications of AI methods in hybrid imaging. Applications in image processing as well as methods for disease-related evaluation are presented and discussed.
Materials and methods
This article is based on a selective literature search with the search engines PubMed and arXiv.
Assessment
Currently, there are only a few AI applications using hybrid imaging data and no applications are established in clinical routine yet. Although the first promising approaches are emerging, they still need to be evaluated prospectively. In the future, AI applications will support radiologists and nuclear medicine radiologists in diagnosis and therapy.
Literatur
Bradshaw TJ, Zhao G, Jang H et al (2018) Feasibility of deep learning–based PET/MR attenuation correction in the pelvis using only diagnostic MR images. Tomography 4:138–147. https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2018.00016
Catana C (2018) The dawn of a new era in low-dose PET imaging. Radiology 290:657–658. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018182573
Chen KT, Gong E, de Carvalho Macruz FB et al (2018) Ultra–low-dose 18F-florbetaben amyloid PET imaging using deep learning with multi-contrast MRI inputs. Radiology 290:649–656. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018180940
Cui J, Gong K, Guo N et al (2019) PET image denoising using unsupervised deep learning. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 46:2780–2789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04468-4
Dong X, Wang T, Lei Y et al (2019) Synthetic CT generation from non-attenuation corrected PET images for whole-body PET imaging. Phys Med Biol 64:215016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab4eb7
Fendler WP, Calais J, Eiber M et al (2019) Assessment of 68ga-PSMA-11 PET accuracy in localizing recurrent prostate cancer: a prospective single-arm clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 5:856–863. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0096
Fendler WP, Weber M, Iravani A et al (2019) Prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand positron-emission tomography in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-1050
Gafita A, Bieth M, Krönke M et al (2019) qPSMA: semiautomatic software for whole-body tumor burden assessment in prostate cancer using 68ga-PSMA11 PET/CT. J Nucl Med 60:1277–1283. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.224055
Gao X, Chu C, Li Y et al (2015) The method and efficacy of support vector machine classifiers based on texture features and multi-resolution histogram from 18F-FDG PET-CT images for the evaluation of mediastinal lymph nodes in patients with lung cancer. Eur J Radiol 84:312–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.11.006
Gsaxner C, Roth PM, Wallner J, Egger J (2019) Exploit fully automatic low-level segmented PET data for training high-level deep learning algorithms for the corresponding CT data. PLoS ONE 14:e212550. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212550
Guo Z, Li X, Huang H et al (2018) Medical image segmentation based on multi-modal convolutional neural network: study on image fusion schemes. 2018 IEEE 15th Int Symp Biomed Imaging ISBI 2018:903–907. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI.2018.8363717
Haubold J, Demircioglu A, Gratz M et al (2019) Non-invasive tumor decoding and phenotyping of cerebral gliomas utilizing multiparametric 18F-FET PET-MRI and MR fingerprinting. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04602-2
Huang B, Chen Z, Wu P‑M et al (2018) Fully automated delineation of gross tumor volume for head and neck cancer on PET-CT using deep learning: a dual-center study. Contrast Media Mol Imaging 2018:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8923028
Huang Y, Xu J, Zhou Y et al (2019) Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease via multi-modality 3D convolutional neural network. Front Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00509
Kirienko M, Sollini M, Silvestri G et al (2018) Convolutional neural networks promising in lung cancer T‑parameter assessment on baseline FDG-PET/CT. Contrast Media Mol Imaging 2018:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1382309
Kläser K, Varsavsky T, Markiewicz P et al (2019) Improved MR to CT synthesis for PET/MR attenuation correction using imitation learning. In: Burgos N, Gooya A, Svoboda D (Hrsg) Simul. synth. med. imaging. Springer, Cham, S 13–21
Kleesiek J, Murray JM, Strack C et al (2019) Wie funktioniert maschinelles Lernen? Radiologe. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-019-00616-x
Kleesiek J, Petersen J, Döring M et al (2016) Virtual raters for reproducible and objective assessments in radiology. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25007
Klyuzhin IS, Cheng J‑C, Bevington C, Sossi V (2019) Use of a tracer-specific deep artificial neural net to denoise dynamic PET images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2019.2927199
Ladefoged CN, Marner L, Hindsholm A et al (2019) Deep learning based attenuation correction of PET/MRI in pediatric brain tumor patients: evaluation in a clinical setting. Front Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.01005
Li Y, Schiepers C, Lake R et al (2012) Clinical utility of (18)F-fluoride PET/CT in benign and malignant bone diseases. Bone 50:128–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2011.09.053
Liu C‑C, Qi J (2019) Higher SNR PET image prediction using a deep learning model and MRI image. Phys Med Biol 64:115004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab0dc0
Liu F, Jang H, Kijowski R et al (2018) Deep learning MR imaging–based attenuation correction for PET/MR imaging. Radiology 286:676–684. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017170700
Liu F, Jang H, Kijowski R et al (2018) A deep learning approach for 18F-FDG PET attenuation correction. EJNMMI Phys 5:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-018-0225-8
Lu D, Popuri K, Ding GW et al (2018) Multimodal and multiscale deep neural networks for the early diagnosis of alzheimer’s disease using structural MR and FDG-PET images. Sci Rep 8:5697. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22871-z
Murray JM, Kaissis G, Braren R, Kleesiek J (2019) Wie funktioniert Radiomics? Radiologe. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-019-00617-w
Papp L, Spielvogel CP, Rausch I et al (2018) Personalizing medicine through hybrid imaging and medical big data analysis. Front Phys 6:51. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2018.00051
Perk T, Bradshaw T, Chen S et al (2018) Automated classification of benign and malignant lesions in 18F-NaF PET/CT images using machine learning. Phys Med Biol 63:225019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aaebd0
Petersen RC, Roberts RO, Knopman DS et al (2009) Mild cognitive impairment: ten years later. Arch Neurol 66:1447–1455. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2009.266
Shiri I, Ghafarian P, Geramifar P et al (2019) Direct attenuation correction of brain PET images using only emission data via a deep convolutional encoder-decoder (deep-DAC). Eur Radiol 29:6867–6879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06229-1
Tan Y‑L, Kim H, Lee S et al (2018) Quantitative surface analysis of combined MRI and PET enhances detection of focal cortical dysplasias. Neuroimage 166:10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.065
Tian C, Xu Y, Fei L, Yan K (2018) Deep learning for image denoising: a survey
Wang H, Zhou Z, Li Y et al (2017) Comparison of machine learning methods for classifying mediastinal lymph node metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer from 18F-FDG PET/CT images. EJNMMI Res 7:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-017-0260-9
Wang Y, Zhou L, Wang L et al (2018) Locality adaptive multi-modality GANs for high-quality PET image synthesis. In: Frangi AF, Schnabel JA, Davatzikos C et al (Hrsg) Med. image comput. comput. assist. interv. – MICCAI 2018. Springer, Cham, S 329–337
Xiang L, Qiao Y, Nie D et al (2017) Deep auto-context convolutional neural networks for standard-dose PET image estimation from low-dose PET/MRI. Neurocomputing 267:406–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2017.06.048
Xu J, Gong E, Pauly J, Zaharchuk G (2017) 200x low-dose PET reconstruction using deep learning
Xu L, Tetteh G, Lipkova J et al (2018) Automated whole-body bone lesion detection for multiple myeloma on 68ga-pentixafor PET/CT imaging using deep learning methods. Contrast Media Mol Imaging 2018:2391925. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2391925
Zhao X, Li L, Lu W, Tan S (2018) Tumor co-segmentation in PET/CT using multi-modality fully convolutional neural network. Phys Med Biol 64:15011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aaf44b
Zhong Z, Kim Y, Plichta K et al (2019) Simultaneous cosegmentation of tumors in PET-CT images using deep fully convolutional networks. Med Phys 46:619–633. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13331
ADNI Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (2017) Webpräsenz. http://adni.loni.usc.edu/. Zugegriffen: 22. Dez. 2019
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
C. Strack, R. Seifert und J. Kleesiek geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autoren keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Strack, C., Seifert, R. & Kleesiek, J. Künstliche Intelligenz in der Hybridbildgebung. Radiologe 60, 405–412 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-020-00646-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-020-00646-w
Schlüsselwörter
- Diagnostische Bildgebung
- Tiefe neuronale Netze
- Maschinelles Lernen
- Deep Learning
- Zellulärer Metabolismus