Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Extrakranielle Karotisstenose

Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge

Extracranial carotid stenosis

Diagnostics, therapy and follow-up

  • CME Zertifizierte Fortbildung
  • Published:
Der Radiologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Bei bis zu 30.000 mit Karotisstenosen assoziierten ischämischen Schlaganfällen pro Jahr in Deutschland stellt sich die Frage nach der adäquaten Behandlung. Dieser Artikel dient dem Überblick über die leitliniengerechte Diagnostik und Therapie der Karotisstenose.

Abstract

Up to 30,000 cases of ischemic stroke associated with carotid stenoses occur each year in Germany which raises the question of an adequate treatment. This article presents a review of the guideline-conform diagnostics and therapy of carotid stenosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5

Literatur

  1. Hill AB (1998) Should patients be screened for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis? Can J Surg 41:208–213

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jacobowitz GR, Rockman CB, Gagne PJ et al (2003) A model for predicting occult carotid artery stenosis: screening is justified in a selected population. J Vasc Surg 38:705–709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kiechl S, Willeit J, Rungger G et al (1994) Quantitative assessment of carotid atherosclerosis in a healthy population. Neuroepidemiology 13:314–317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Willeit J, Kiechl S (1993) Prevalence and risk factors of asymptomatic extracranial carotid artery atherosclerosis. A population-based study. Arterioscler Thromb 13:661–668

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hillen T, Nieczaj R, Münzberg H et al (2000) Carotid atherosclerosis, vascular risk profile and mortality in a population-based sample of functionally healthy elderly subjects: the Berlin ageing study. J Intern Med 247:679–688

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mathiesen EB, Bonaa KH, Joakimsen O (2001) Echolucent plaques are associated with high risk of ischemic cerebrovascular events in carotid stenosis: the tromsø study. Circulation 103:2171–2175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Altaf N, MacSweeney ST, Gladman J, Auer DP (2007) Carotid intraplaque hemorrhage predicts recurrent symptoms in patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. Stroke 38:1633–1635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Markus HS, King A, Shipley M et al (2010) Asymptomatic embolisation for prediction of stroke in the Asymptomatic Carotid Emboli Study (ACES): a prospective observational study. Lancet Neurol 9:663–671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rerkasem K, Rothwell PM (2009) Systematic review of the operative risks of carotid endarterectomy for recently symptomatic stenosis in relation to the timing of surgery. Stroke 40:e564–e572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cina CS, Clase CM, Haynes RB (2000) Carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:CD001081

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schellinger PD, Fiebach JB, Hacke W (2003) Imaging-based decision making in thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke: present status. Stroke 34:575–583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fairhead JF, Mehta Z, Rothwell PM (2005) Population-based study of delays in carotid imaging and surgery and the risk of recurrent stroke. Neurology 65:371–375

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hennerici M, Daffertshofer M, Jakobs L (1998) Failure to identify cerebral infarct mechanisms from topography of vascular territory lesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 19:1067–1074

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. http://www.nihstrokescale.org

  15. Redgrave JN, Coutts SB, Schulz UG et al (2007) Systematic review of associations between the presence of acute ischemic lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging and clinical predictors of early stroke risk after transient ischemic attack. Stroke 38:1482–1488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Arning C (2001) Does cw Doppler ultrasound still have a value for cerebrovascular diagnosis today? Nervenarzt 72:625–628

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Arning C, Widder B, Reutern GM von et al (2010) Revision of DEGUM ultrasound criteria for grading internal carotid artery stenoses and transfer to NASCET measurement. Ultraschall Med 31:251–257

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. U-King-Im JM, Trivedi RA, Graves MJ et al (2004) Contrast-enhanced MR angiography for carotid disease: diagnostic and potential clinical impact. Neurology 62:1282–1290

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hankey GJ, Warlow CP, Molyneux AJ (1990) Complications of cerebral angiography for patients with mild carotid territory ischaemia being considered for carotid endarterectomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 53:542–548

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rouleau PA, Huston J 3rd, Gilbertson J et al (1999) Carotid artery tandem lesions: frequency of angiographic detection and consequences for endarterectomy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20:621–625

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Spence JD, Tamayo A, Lownie SP et al (2005) Absence of microemboli on transcranial Doppler identifies low-risk patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke 36:2373–2378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Reiff T, Stingele R, Eckstein HH et al (2009) Stent-protected angioplasty in asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis vs. endarterectomy: SPACE2 – a three-arm randomised-controlled clinical trial. Int J Stroke 4:294–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Brooks WH, McClure RR, Jones MR et al (2004) Carotid angioplasty and stenting versus carotid endarterectomy for treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a randomized trial in a community hospital. Neurosurgery 54:318–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gurm HS, Yadav JS, Fayad P et al (2008) Long-term results of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 358:1572–1579

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Brott TG, Hobson RW, Howard G et al (2010) Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 363:11–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sheffet AJ, Roubin G, Howard G et al (2010) Design of the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs. Stenting Trial (CREST). Int J Stroke 5:40–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Papanagiotou P, Roth C, Walter S et al (2012) Angiographic evidence of reperfusion injury after carotid artery stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 60(5):e7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurologie (2008) Primär- und Sekundärprävention der zerebralen Ischämie. Gemeinsame Leitlinie der DGN und der Deutschen Schlaganfallgesellschaft. http://www.dgn.org/images/stories/dgn/leitlinien/LL2008/ll08kap_024.pdf

  29. Meier P, Knapp G, Tamhane U et al (2010) Short term and intermediate term comparison of endarterectomy versus stenting for carotid artery stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled clinical trials. BMJ 340:c467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cao PG, De Rango P, Zannetti S et al (2001) Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy for preventing stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:CD001921

    Google Scholar 

  31. Muto A, Nishibe T, Dardik H, Dardik A (2009) Patches for carotid artery endarterectomy: current materials and prospects. J Vasc Surg 50:206–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rothwell PM (2007) Making the most of secondary prevention. Stroke 38:1726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kastrup A, Groschel K (2007) Carotid endarterectomy versus carotid stenting: an updated review of randomized trials and subgroup analyses. Acta Chir Belg 107:119–128

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Qureshi AI, Luft AR, Sharma M et al (1999) Frequency and determinants of postprocedural hemodynamic instability after carotid angioplasty and stenting. Stroke 30:2086–2093

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. http://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/004-028l_S3_Extracranielle_Carotisstenose_08_2012_01.pdf

  36. Holt PJ, Poloniecki JD, Loftus IM, Thompson MM (2007) Meta-analysis and systematic review of the relationship between hospital volume and outcome following carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 33:645–651

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Fiehler J, Jansen O, Berger J et al (2008) Differences in complication rates among the centres in the SPACE study. Neuroradiology 50:1049–1053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hobson RW, Howard VJ, Roubin GS et al (2004) Carotid artery stenting is associated with increased complications in octogenarians: 30-day stroke and death rates in the CREST lead-in phase. J Vasc Surg 40:1106–1111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hopkins LN, Roubin GS, Chakhtoura EY et al (2010) The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial: credentialing of interventionalists and final results of lead-in phase. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 19:153–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gray WA, Rosenfield KA, Jaff MR et al (2011) Influence of site and operator characteristics on carotid artery stent outcomes: analysis of the CAPTURE 2 (Carotid ACCULINK/ACCUNET Post Approval Trial to Uncover Rare Events) clinical study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 4:235–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Roth SM, Back MR, Bandyk DF et al (1999) A rational algorithm for duplex scan surveillance after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 30:453–460

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Gröschel K, Riecker A, Schulz JB et al (2005) Systematic review of early recurrent stenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting. Stroke 36:367–373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Brott TG, Hobson RW, Howard G et al (2010) Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 363:11–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Str., 66424, Homburg-Saar, Deutschland

    W. Reith

Authors
  1. W. Reith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Reith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reith, W. Extrakranielle Karotisstenose. Radiologe 53, 545–560 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-013-2512-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-013-2512-7

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation