Skip to main content
Log in

Die Bedeutung bildgebender Diagnostik und interventioneller Therapie bei Erkrankungen der ableitenden Tränenwege

Importance of imaging diagnostics and interventional therapy for diseases of the lacrimal drainage canals

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Radiologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Epiphora (Tränenträufeln) wird häufig durch Obstruktionen der ableitenden Tränenwege verursacht. Die Darstellung der Tränengänge mit Kontrastmittel mit der Dakryozystographie in digitaler Subtraktionsangiographie- (DSA-)Technik ist als Goldstandard für die bildgebende Diagnostik bei Patienten mit auf konservative Therapiemaßnahmen nicht ansprechender Epiphora anzusehen. Neue Techniken wie die 3D-Rotationsdakryozystographie, MRT und CT können neben den Tränenwegen auch die anatomischen Nachbarschaftsstrukturen darstellen und insbesondere die Planung endoskopischer Operationen erleichtern. Zu den dakryozystographisch kontrollierten Interventionen zählen die Ballondilatation und die Stentimplantation. Die Ballon-Dakryozystoplastie ist insbesondere bei Patienten mit relativen Stenosen oder kurzstreckigen Verschlüssen des Ductus nasolacrimalis erfolgversprechend. Die Implantation von Kunststoffstents kann die Offenheitsrate der Tränenwege verbessern. Die interventionellen Techniken eignen sich aufgrund der im Vergleich zur offenen oder endoskopischen Operation geringen Invasivität als initiale Behandlungsmethode, haben jedoch begrenzte klinische Erfolgsraten im Langzeitverlauf. Die operative Behandlung spielt dementsprechend nach wie vor eine große Rolle. Eine vergleichende Evaluation der Therapieoptionen durch Studien ist erforderlich.

Abstract

Epiphora (continuous watering of the eyes) is frequently caused by obstruction of the lacrimal draining system. Radiographic imaging of the tear ducts after contrast injection with the DSA (digital subtraction angiography) dacryocystography technique is still the gold standard in patients with severe epiphora which does not respond to conservative therapy. Recent techniques, such as 3D rotational dacryocystography, MRI and CT are able to show the anatomic surroundings in addition to the ductal structures and are especially useful for planning endoscopic operations. Dacryocystographically assisted interventions, such as balloon dilatation or stenting of tear duct stenoses are technically feasible. Balloon dacryocystoplasty is especially successful in patients with incomplete or short distance obstructions of the nasolacrimal duct. Stenting may improve procedural success and patency rates. Minimally invasive interventional therapy is useful as an initial treatment in selected cases, however, long-term success rates may be limited and operative dacryocystorhinostomy still plays an important role. Comparative studies for evaluation of different therapeutic options are necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5

Literatur

  1. Berkefeld J, Kirchner J, Müller HM et al. (1997) Balloon dacryocystoplasty: indications and contraindications. Radiology 205: 785–790

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Caldemeyer KS, Stockberger SM jr, Broderick LS (1998) Topical contrast-enhanced CT and MR dacryocystography: imaging the lacrimal drainage apparatus of healthy volunteers. Am J Roentgenol 171: 1501–1504

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cokkeser Y, Evereklioglu C, Er H (2000) Comparative external versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: results in 115 patients (130 eyes). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123: 488–491

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Emmerich KH, Meyer-Rüsenberg HW, Simko P (1997) Endoskopie der Tränenwege. Ophthalmologe 94: 732–735

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Emmerich KH, Steinhauer J, Meyer-Rüsenberg HW, Lüchtenberg M (1998) Dacryoendoskopie – gegenwärtiger Stand. Ophthalmologe 95: 820–822

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gökçek A, Argin MA, Altintas AK (2005) Comparison of failed and successful dacryocystorhinostomy by using computed tomographic dacryocystography findings. Eur J Ophthalmol 15: 523–529

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hartikainen J, Antila J, Varpula M et al. (1998) Prospective randomized comparison of endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy and external dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope 108: 1861–1866

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hünerbein R, Grass F, Leber M et al. (2005) Balloon dacryocystoplasty: interventional radiological therapy of congenital dacryostenosis. Rofo 177: 1387–1393

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Karagülle T, Erden A, Erden I, Zilelioğlu G (2002) Nasolacrimal system: evaluation with gadolinium-enhanced MR dacryocystography with a three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-recalled technique. Eur Radiol 12: 2343–2348

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lachmund U, Ammann-Rauch D, Forrer A et al. (2005) Balloon catheter dilatation of common canaliculus stenoses. Orbit 24: 177–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lanciego C, Toledano N, De Miguel S et al. (2003) Resolution of epiphora with nasolacrimal stents: results of long-term follow-up in a multicenter prospective study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14: 1417–1425

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lanciego C, De Miguel S, Padilla M et al. (2006) Nasolacrimal stenting: toward improving outcomes with a simple modification of the song stent. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 29: 586–594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee JM, Song HY, Han YM et al. (1994) Balloon dacryocystoplasty: results in the treatment of complete and partial obstructions of the nasolacrimal system. Radiology 192: 503–508

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee DH, Song HY, Ahn H et al. (2001) Balloon dacryocystoplasty: results and factors influencing outcome in 350 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12: 500–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lüchtenberg M, Mikowski A, Schalnus R et al. (2000) Erythematous eyelid swelling after dacryocystography. Perforation of the efferent lacrimal ducts in dacryocystography with contrast medium extravasation. Ophthalmologe 97: 894–895

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lüchtenberg M, Hattenbach LO, Berkefeld J (2004) A new possibility for imaging the lacrimal draining system. Three-dimensional rotation dacryocystography. Ophthalmologe 101: 366–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lüchtenberg M, Kuhli C, du Mesnil de Rochemont R et al. (2005) Three-dimensional rotational dacryocystography for imaging of the lacrimal draining system and adjacent anatomical structures. Ophthalmologica 219: 136–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lüchtenberg M, Bartel JH, Bink A et al. (2007) Clinical effectiveness of balloon dacryocystoplasty in circumscribed obstructions of the nasolacrimal duct. Ophthalmologica 221: 434–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Manfrè L, de Maria M, Todaro E et al. (2000) MR dacryocystography: comparison with dacryocystography and CT dacryocystography. Am J Neuroradiol 21: 1145–1150

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mansfield DC, Zeki SM, Mackenzie JR (1994) Case report: extravasation of lipiodol-a complication of dacryocystography. Clin Radiol 49: 217–218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Meyer-Rüsenberg HW, Emmerich KH, Lüchtenberg M, Steinhauer J (1999) Endoscopic laser dacryoplasty. Methodology and outcome after 3 months. Ophthalmologe 96: 332–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Oztürk S, Konuk O, Ilgit ET et al. (2004) Outcome of patients with nasolacrimal polyurethane stent implantation: do they keep tearing? Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 20: 130–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pinilla I, Fernández-Prieto AF, Asencio M et al. (2006) Nasolacrimal stents for the treatment of epiphora: technical problems and long-term results. Orbit 25: 75–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Song HY, Jin YH, Kim JH et al. (1994) Nasolacrimal duct obstruction treated nonsurgically with use of plastic stents. Radiology 190: 535–539

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Song HY, Lee CO, Park S et al. (1996) Lacrimal canalicular obstructions: safety and effectiveness of balloon dilation. J Vasc Interv Radiol 7: 929–934

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wilhelm K, Textor J, Hofer U et al. (1997) Stent implantation and balloon dilatation in the treatment of stenosis and obstruction of the lacrimal apparatus. Rofo 167: 486–490

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wilhelm KE, Hofer U, Textor HJ et al. (2000) Nonsurgical fluoroscopically guided dacryocystoplasty of common canalicular obstructions. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 23: 1–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Yoshikawa T, Hirota S, Sugimura K (2000) Topical contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance dacryocystography. Radiat Med 18: 355–362

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Die korrespondierende Autorin gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Bink.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bink, A., Lüchtenberg, M. & Berkefeld, J. Die Bedeutung bildgebender Diagnostik und interventioneller Therapie bei Erkrankungen der ableitenden Tränenwege. Radiologe 48, 1155–1160 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-008-1695-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-008-1695-9

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation