Prokop M (2008) Technique of CT angiography. In: Rubin GD, Rofsky NM (eds) CT and MR angiography: comprehensive vascular assessment. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
IMV (2006) IMV 2006 CT Market Summary Report. IMV Medical Information Division; Des Plains, IL, USA
Nickoloff EL, Alderson PO (2001) Commentary. Radiation exposures to patients from CT: reality, public perceptions, and policy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177: 285–287
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Panzer W, Zankl M (1993) Die Strahlenexposition des Patienten bei computertomographischen Untersuchungen. Röntgenpraxis 46: 15–18
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
European Commission (1999) Radiation Protection 109, Guidance on diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for medical exposures. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
Haaga JR (2001) Commentary. Radiation dose management: weighing risk versus benefit. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177: 289–291
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, Berdon WE (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176: 289–296
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Paterson A, Frush DP, Donnelly LF (2001) Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? AJR Am J Roentgenol 176: 297–301
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Donnelly LF, Emery KH, Brody AS et al. (2001) Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: strategies at a large children’s hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176: 303–306 (siehe auch Kommentar AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176: 287)
Google Scholar
Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography – an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357: 2277–2284; Review
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
UNSCEAR (2000) Report: sources and effects of ionizing radiation. Report of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Volume I: Sources, United Nations, New York
Google Scholar
Brenner DJ (2006) It is time to retire the computed tomography dose index (CTDI) for CT quality assurance and dose optimization. Med Phys 33: 1189–1191
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Deak P, van Straten M, Shrimpton PC et al. (in press) Validation of a Monte Carlo tool for patient-specific dose simulations in multi-slice computed tomography. Eur Radiol, Epub ahead of print
Brenner DJ (2004) Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer. Radiology 231: 440–445
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
BEIR VII REport (2007) Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation – BEIR VII. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
McCullough CH, Schueler BA (2000) Calculation of effective dose. Med Phys 27: 828–837
Article
Google Scholar
Van der Molen AJ, Geleijns J (2007) Overranging in multisection CT: quantification and relative contribution to dose – comparison of four 16-section CT scanners. Radiology 242: 208–216
Google Scholar
Preston DL, Ron E, Tokuoka S et al. (2007) Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958–1998. Radiat Res 168: 1–64
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Velanovich V, Satava R (1992) Balancing the normal appendectomy rate with the perforated appendicitis rate: implications for quality assurance. Am Surg 58: 264–269
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz (2006) Umweltradioaktivität und Strahlenbelastung im Jahr 2005 (Parlamentsbericht). Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit. Deutscher Bundestag, Drucksache 16/3084, Berlin
Berrington de Gonzalez A, Darby S (2004) Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet 363: 345–351
Article
Google Scholar
Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz (2007) Strahlenthemen: Röntgendiagnostik – schädlich oder nützlich? BfS 2005 (http://www.bfs.de/de/ion/medizin/roentgen.html)
Hall EJ, Brenner DJ (2003) The weight of evidence does not support the suggestion that exposure to low doses of X rays increases longevity. Radiology 229: 18–19
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Prokop M (2001) Dosisoptimierung in der thorakalen Computertomographie. Radiologe 41: 269–278
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Nagel HD (1999) Dosisbeeinflussende Faktoren. In: Nagel HD (Hrsg) Strahlenexposition in der Computertomographie. ZVEI, S 25–44
Prokop M, Memarsadhegi M, Homolka P (2001) Non-quantum noise limits low-dose applications of multislice CT. Radiology 221(P): 367
Google Scholar
Prokop M (2003) General principles of MDCT. Eur J Radiol 45 [suppl 1]: S4–S10
Fuchs T, Kalender WA (2003) On the correlation of pixel noise, spatial resolution and dose in computed tomography. Phys Medica XIX: 153–164
Google Scholar
Li B, Avinash GB, Hsieh J (2007) Resolution and noise trade-off analysis for volumetric CT. Med Phys 34: 3732–3738
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Husstedt H, Prokop M et al. (1998) Fensterweite als dosisrelevanter Parameter bei Hochkontraststrukturen in der CT. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 168: 139–143
PubMed
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Waaijer A, Prokop M, Velthuis BK et al. (2007) Circle of Willis at CT angiography: dose reduction and image quality – reducing tube voltage and increasing tube current settings. Radiology 242: 832–839
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Chow LC, Kwan SW, Olcott EW, Sommer G (2007) Split-bolus MDCT urography with synchronous nephrographic and excretory phase enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189: 314–322
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Schaefer-Prokop C, Bankier AA, Janata U et al. (2005) Complete chest CTA versus limited range CTA for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: what do we miss? Eur Radiol 15 [suppl]: B595 (abstr)
Tack D, Sourtzis S, Delpierre I et al. (2003) Low-dose unenhanced multidetector CT of patients with suspected renal colic. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180: 305–311
PubMed
Google Scholar
Van der Molen AJ, Veldkamp WJ, Geleijns J (2007) 16-slice CT: achievable effective doses of common protocols in comparison with recent CT dose surveys. Br J Radiol 80: 248–255
Google Scholar
Kachelrieß M, Kalender WA (1999) Dose reduction by generalized 3D adaptive filtering for conventional and spiral-, single-, multirow- and cone-beam CT: theoretical considerations, simulations, phantom measurements and pateitn studies. Radiology 213(P): 283
Google Scholar
Wessling J, Esseling R, Raupach R et al. (2007) The effect of dose reduction and feasibility of edge-preserving noise reduction on the detection of liver lesions using MSCT. Eur Radiol 17: 1885–1891
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL et al. (2004) Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. Radiology 233: 649–657
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Brisse HJ, Madec L, Gaboriaud G et al. (2007) Automatic exposure control in multichannel CT with tube current modulation to achieve a constant level of image noise: experimental assessment on pediatric phantoms. Med Phys 34: 3018–3033
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M et al. (2006) Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 113: 1305–1310
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O et al. (in press) Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur Heart J, Epub ahead of print
Hurwitz LM, Reiman RE, Yoshizumi TT et al. (2007) Radiation dose from contemporary cardiothoracic multidetector CT protocols with an anthropomorphic female phantom: implications for cancer induction. Radiology 245: 742–750
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Kanal KM, Stewart BK, Kolokythas O, Shuman WP (2007) Impact of operator-selected image noise index and reconstruction slice thickness on patient radiation dose in 64-MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189: 219–225
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar