Skip to main content
Log in

Autologe Chondrozytentransplantation zur Behandlung von Knorpeldefekten des Kniegelenks

Techniken und Ergebnisse

Autologous chondrocyte transplantation for the treatment of articular cartilage defects inf the knee joint: techniques and results

  • Knorpeltransplantation
  • Published:
Der Radiologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Zur Behandlung umschriebener Defekte des artikulären Kniegelenkgelenkknorpels wird der Einsatz autologer Knorpelzellen zunehmend als neue biologische Methode empfohlen.

Methoden

Die Technik der autologen Chondrozytentransplantation (ACT) und deren Modifikationen als matrixassoziierte autologe Chondrozytentransplantation (MACT) werden dargestellt. Es erfolgt ein Überblick über die experimentellen und klinischen Ergebnisse mit der Darstellung der häufigsten Komplikationen und den derzeit gültigen Indikationsrichtlinien.

Ergebnisse

Unter Verwendung qualitativ hochwertiger Zellen zeigen besonders posttraumatische Knorpeldefekte bei jüngeren Patienten eine hohe Erfolgsquote mit der Ausbildung eines hyalinartigen Regeneratgewebes. Die häufigsten Komplikationen der ACT sind Periosthypertrophie, Delamination des Transplantats, intraartikuläre Adhäsionen und Transplantatversagen. Die derzeit wichtigsten Limitierungen stellen die Osteoarthrose und ein höheres Patientenalter dar.

Schlussfolgerungen

Bei richtiger Indikationsstellung und operativer Technik kann die ACT als effiziente und sichere Therapieoption für die Behandlung großer und tiefer Knorpeldefekte des Kniegelenks angesehen werden.

Abstract

Background

Currently the use of autologous chondrocytes as a cartilage-repair procedure for the repair of injured articular cartilage of the knee joint, is recommended.

Methods

This review presents the technique of autologous chonrocyte transplantation (ACT) and their modifications as matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT). Beside the surgical procedure the experimental and clinical results are discussed. Furthermore the major complications and the indication guidelines are presented.

Results

Articular cartilage in adults has a poor ability to self-repair after a substantial injury. Surgical therapeutic efforts in treating cartilage defects have focused on bringing new cells capable of chondrogenesis into the lesions. With ACT good to excellent clinical results are seen in isolated posttraumatic lesions of the knee joint in the younger patient with the formation of hyalinelike repair tissue. The major complications are periosteal hypertrophy, delamination of the transplant, arthrofibrosis and transplant failure. The current limitations include osteoarthritic defects and higher patient age.

Conclusion

With the right indication and operative technique ACT is an effective and save option for the treatment of large full thickness cartilage defect of the knee joint.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4a, b
Abb. 5a–c

Literatur

  1. Behrens P, Bruns J, Erggelet C et al. (2002) AG „ACT und Tissue Engineering“ unter der Schirmherrschaft der DGU und DGOOC. DGU—Mitteilungen und Nachrichten 45:43–51

  2. Bentley G, Biant LC, Carrington RW et al. (2003) A prospective, randomised comparison of autologous chondrocyte implantation versus mosaicplasty for osteochondral defects in the knee. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 85:223–230

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bentley G, Greer RBD (1971) Homotransplantation of isolated epiphyseal and articular cartilage chondrocytes into joint surfaces of rabbits. Nature 230:385–388

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brittberg M (1999) Autologous chondrocyte transplantation. Clin Orthop 367 [Suppl]:S147–155

  5. Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Nilsson A, Ohlsson C, Isaksson O, Peterson L (1994) Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Engl J Med 331:889–895

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brittberg M, Nilsson A, Lindahl A, Ohlsson C, Peterson L (1996) Rabbit articular cartilage defects treated with autologous cultured chondrocytes. Clin Orthop 326:270–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Buckwalter JA, Mankin HJ (1998) Articular cartilage: degeneration and osteoarthritis, repair, regeneration, and transplantation. Instr Course Lect 47:487–504

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cherubino P, Grassi FA, Bulgheroni P, Ronga M (2003) Autologous chondrocyte implantation using a bilayer collagen membrane: a preliminary report. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 11:10–15

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chesterman PJ, Smith AU (1968) Homotransplantation of articular cartilage and isolated chondrocytes. An experimental study in rabbits. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 50:184–197

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dell’Accio F, Vanlauwe J, Bellemans J, Neys J, De Bari C, Luyten FP (2003) Expanded phenotypically stable chondrocytes persist in the repair tissue and contribute to cartilage matrix formation and structural integration in a goat model of autologous chondrocyte implantation. J Orthop Res 21:123–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Erggelet C, Browne JE, Fu F, Mandelbaum BR, Micheli LJ, Mosely JB (2000) [Autologous chondrocyte transplantation for treatment of cartilage defects of the knee joint. Clinical results]. Zentralbl Chir 125:516–522

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Erggelet C, Sittinger M, Lahm A (2003) The arthroscopic implantation of autologous chondrocytes for the treatment of full-thickness cartilage defects of the knee joint. Arthroscopy 19:108–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gaissmaier C, Fritz J, Mollenhauer J et al. (2003) Verlauf klinisch symtomatischer Knorpelschäden des Kniegelenks. Ergebnisse ohne und mit biologischer Rekonstruktion. Dtsch Ärzetbl 100:2448–2453

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gillogly SD, Voight M, Blackburn T (1998) Treatment of articular cartilage defects of the knee with autologous chondrocyte implantation [In Process Citation]. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28:241–251

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Grande DA, Pitman MI, Peterson L, Menche D, Klein M (1989) The repair of experimentally produced defects in rabbit articular cartilage by autologous chondrocyte transplantation. J Orthop Res 7:208–218

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Horas U, Pelinkovic D, Herr G, Aigner T, Schnettler R (2003) Autologous chondrocyte implantation and osteochondral cylinder transplantation in cartilage repair of the knee joint. A prospective, comparative trial. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 85-A:185–192

  17. Hunziker EB (2002) Articular cartilage repair: basic science and clinical progress. A review of the current status and prospects. Osteoarthritis Cartil 10:432–463

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Löhnert J, Ruhnau K, Gossen A, Bernsmann K, Wiese M (1999) Autologe Chondrozytentransplantation (ACT) im Kniegelenk. Erste klinische Ergebnisse. Arthroskopie 12:34–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mankin HJ (1982) The response of articular cartilage to mechanical injury. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 64:460–466

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mankin HJ (1994) Chondrocyte transplantation—one answer to an old question [editorial; comment]. N Engl J Med 331:940–941

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Marlovits S, Vécsei V (2000) Möglichkeiten zur chirurgischen Therapie von Knorpeldefekten. Teil 1: Grundlagen der Knorpelbiologie und der Heilung von Knorpeldefekten. Acta Chir Austriaca 32:124–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Marlovits S, Vécsei V (2000) Möglichkeiten zur chirurgischen Therapie von Knorpeldefekten. Teil 2: Chirurgische Behandlungsoptionen zur biologischen Knorpelreparatur. Acta Chir Austriaca 32:185–195

    Google Scholar 

  23. Messner K, Gillquist J (1996) Cartilage repair. A critical review. Acta Orthop Scand 67:523–529

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Minas T (1998) Chondrocyte implantation in the repair of chondral lesions of the knee: economics and quality of life. Am J Orthop 27:739–744

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Minas T (2001) Autologous chondrocyte implantation for focal chondral defects of the knee. Clin Orthop 391 [Suppl]:S349–361

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pavesio A, Abatangelo G, Borrione A et al. (2003) Hyaluronan-based scaffolds (hyalograft C) in the treatment of knee cartilage defects: preliminary clinical findings. Novartis Found Symp 249:203–217; discussion 229–233, 234–238, 239–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Peterson L, Minas T, Brittberg M, Nilsson A, Sjogren-Jansson E, Lindahl A (2000) Two- to 9-year outcome after autologous chondrocyte transplantation of the knee. Clin Orthop 374:212–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schnabel M, Marlovits S, Eckhoff G et al. (2002) Dedifferentiation-associated changes in morphology and gene expression in primary human articular chondrocytes in cell culture. Osteoarthritis Cartil 10:62–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Smith AU (1965) Survival of frozen chondrocytes isolated from cartilage of adult mammals. Nature 205:782–784

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt:

Der korrespondierende Autor versichert, dass keine Verbindungen mit einer Firma, deren Produkt in dem Artikel genannt ist, oder einer Firma, die ein Konkurrenzprodukt vertreibt, bestehen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Marlovits.

Additional information

Gefördert durch die Lorenz-Böhler-Gesellschaft (Projekt 96/5 und 02/10).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marlovits, S., Kutscha-Lissberg, F., Aldrian, S. et al. Autologe Chondrozytentransplantation zur Behandlung von Knorpeldefekten des Kniegelenks. Radiologe 44, 763–772 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-004-1082-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-004-1082-0

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation