Skip to main content
Log in

Therapieoptionen zur Behandlung von Knorpelschäden: Techniken und Indikationen

Therapeutic options in the treatment of cartilage defects: techniques and indications

  • Knorpeltransplantation
  • Published:
Der Radiologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Das artikuläre Knorpelgewebe besteht aus einer einzelnen Zellpopulation, integriert in ein dreidimensionales Netzwerk hochorganisierter Matrixstrukturen. Dieser feingewebliche Aufbau bestimmt die einzigartigen mechanischen Eigenschaften, limitiert aber auch die physiologischen Reparationsmöglichkeiten von Knorpeldefekten.

Methoden

Diese Übersicht beschreibt die Grundlagen der Knorpelbiologie und die Mechanismen der Knorpelreparatur und behandelt die klinischen Ergebnisse chirurgischer Techniken zur Therapie umschriebener Knorpeldefekte.

Ergebnisse

Die chirurgischen Techniken zur Therapie lokalisierter Defekte der Gelenkoberfläche versuchen durch die Integration biologischer Mechanismen die mangelnde Regenerationsfähigkeit artikulären Knorpels zu überwinden. Die Techniken der Transplantation chondrogener Gewebe wurden in jüngster Zeit durch die Defektauffüllung mit autologen Chondrozyten erweitert.

Schlussfolgerungen

Eine klare Indikationsstellung und die zusätzliche Beseitigung von Bandinstabilitäten und Achsenfehlstellungen sind für jede knorpelchirurgische Therapieform unerlässlich.

Abstract

Background

Cartilage is composed of chondrocytes embedded within an extracellular matrix of collagens, proteoglycans, and noncollagenous proteins. Together, these structures maintain the unique mechanical properties and manifest its striking inability to heal even the most minor injury.

Methods

This review presents the principles of cartilage structure and the biological background of cartilage repair and gives information about the surgical techniques for treating cartilage defects.

Results

The response of cartilage to injuries differs from that of other tissues because of its avascularity, the immobility of chondrocytes and the limited ability of mature chondrocytes to proliferate and alter their synthetic patterns. Surgical therapeutic efforts in treating cartilage defects have focused on bringing new cells and tissues capable of chondrogenesis into the lesions and facilitating the access to the vascular system.

Conclusion

The right indication and the treatment of joint instability and axis deformation are essential for the successful use of cartilage repair procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5

Literatur

  1. Angermann P, Riegels-Nielsen P, Pedersen H (1998) Osteochondritis dissecans of the femoral condyle treated with periosteal transplantation. Poor outcome in 14 patients followed for 6–9 years. Acta Orthop Scand 69:595–597

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Behrens P, Bruns J, Erggelet C et al. (2002) AG „ACT und Tissue Engineering“ unter der Schirmherrschaft der DGU und DGOOC. DGU—Mitteilungen und Nachrichten 45:43–51

  3. Bert JM, Maschka K (1989) The arthroscopic treatment of unicompartmental gonarthrosis: a five-year follow-up study of abrasion arthroplasty plus arthroscopic debridement and arthroscopic debridement alone. Arthroscopy 5:25–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bobic V (1996) Arthroscopic osteochondral autograft transplantation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a preliminary clinical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 3:262–264

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bouwmeester SJ, Beckers JM, Kuijer R, van der Linden AJ, Bulstra SK (1997) Long-term results of rib perichondrial grafts for repair of cartilage defects in the human knee. Int Orthop 21:313–317

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Nilsson A, Ohlsson C, Isaksson O, Peterson L (1994) Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Engl J Med 331:889–895

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bruns J, Kersten P, Lierse W, Silbermann M (1992) Autologous rib perichondrial grafts in experimentally induced osteochondral lesions in the sheep-knee joint: morphological results. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol 421:1–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buckwalter JA (1998) Articular cartilage: injuries and potential for healing. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28:192–202

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Buckwalter JA, Lohmander S (1994) Operative treatment of osteoarthrosis. Current practice and future development. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 76:1405–1418

    Google Scholar 

  10. Buckwalter JA, Mankin HJ (1998) Articular cartilage: tissue design and chondrocyte-matrix interactions. Instr Course Lect 47:477–486

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Erggelet C, Sittinger M, Lahm A (2003) The arthroscopic implantation of autologous chondrocytes for the treatment of full-thickness cartilage defects of the knee joint. Arthroscopy 19:108–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Evans CH, Mazzocchi RA, Nelson DD, Rubash HE (1984) Experimental arthritis induced by intraarticular injection of allogenic cartilaginous particles into rabbit knees. Arthritis Rheum 27:200–207

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gaissmaier C, Fritz J, Mollenhauer J et al. (2003) Verlauf klinisch symtomatischer Knorpelschäden des Kniegelenks. Ergebnisse ohne und mit biologischer Rekonstruktion. Dtsch Ärztebl 100:2448–2453

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hangody L, Kish G, Karpati Z, Szerb I, Udvarhelyi I (1997) Arthroscopic autogenous osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of femoral condylar articular defects. A preliminary report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5:262–267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hangody L, Kish G, Karpati Z, Udvarhelyi I, Szigeti I, Bely M (1998) Mosaicplasty for the treatment of articular cartilage defects: application in clinical practice [see comments]. Orthopedics 21:751–756

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Homminga GN, Bulstra SK, Bouwmeester PS, van der Linden AJ (1990) Perichondral grafting for cartilage lesions of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 72:1003–1007

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hunziker EB (2002) Articular cartilage repair: basic science and clinical progress. A review of the current status and prospects. Osteoarthritis Cartil 10:432–463

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Korkala OL, Kuokkanen HO (1995) Autoarthroplasty of knee cartilage defects by osteoperiosteal grafts. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 114:253–256

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mandelbaum BR, Browne JE, Fu F et al. (1998) Articular cartilage lesions of the knee. Am J Sports Med 26:853–861

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Marlovits S, Vécsei V (2000) Möglichkeiten zur chirurgischen Therapie von Knorpeldefekten. Teil 1: Grundlagen der Knorpelbiologie und der Heilung von Knorpeldefekten. Acta Chir Austriaca 32:124–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Marlovits S, Vécsei V (2000) Möglichkeiten zur chirurgischen Therapie von Knorpeldefekten. Teil 2: Chirurgische Behandlungsoptionen zur biologischen Knorpelreparatur. Acta Chir Austriaca 32:185–195

    Google Scholar 

  22. Minas T, Nehrer S (1997) Current concepts in the treatment of articular cartilage defects. Orthopedics 20:525–538

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moseley JB, O’Malley K, Petersen NJ et al. (2002) A controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med 347:81–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Newman AP (1998) Articular cartilage repair. Am J Sports Med 26:309–324

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. O’Driscoll SW (1998) The healing and regeneration of articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 80:1795–1812

    Google Scholar 

  26. Outerbridge HK, Outerbridge AR, Outerbridge RE (1995) The use of a lateral patellar autologous graft for the repair of a large osteochondral defect in the knee. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 77:65–72

    Google Scholar 

  27. Peterson L, Minas T, Brittberg M, Nilsson A, Sjogren-Jansson E, Lindahl A (2000) Two- to 9-year outcome after autologous chondrocyte transplantation of the knee. Clin Orthop 212–234

  28. Rodrigo JJ, Steadman JR, Silliman JF, Fulstone HA (1994) Improvement of full-thickness chondral defect healing in the human knee after debridment and microfracture using continous passive motion. Am J Knee Surg 109–116

  29. Spindler KP, Schils JP, Bergfeld JA et al. (1993) Prospective study of osseous, articular, and meniscal lesions in recent anterior cruciate ligament tears by magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med 21:551–557

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Steadman JR, Rodkey WG, Briggs KK, Rodrigo JJ (1999) [The microfracture technic in the management of complete cartilage defects in the knee joint]. Orthopade 28:26–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt:

Der korrespondierende Autor versichert, dass keine Verbindungen mit einer Firma, deren Produkt in dem Artikel genannt ist, oder einer Firma, die ein Konkurrenzprodukt vertreibt, bestehen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Resinger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Resinger, C., Vécsei, V. & Marlovits, S. Therapieoptionen zur Behandlung von Knorpelschäden: Techniken und Indikationen. Radiologe 44, 756–762 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-004-1081-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-004-1081-1

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation