Skip to main content
Log in

Nichtinvasive Stimulationsverfahren in der Neurologie

Transkranielle Gleichstromstimulation zur kognitiven Funktionsverbesserung

Non-invasive brain stimulation in neurology

Transcranial direct current stimulation to enhance cognitive functioning

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Nervenarzt Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Transkranielle Gleichstromstimulation (tDCS) ist mittlerweile ein gängiges Verfahren in den Neurowissenschaften, mit dem sich kognitive Funktionen modulieren lassen. Aktuelle Studien legen nahe, dass über die Modulation neuronaler Aktivität und Konnektivität eine Verbesserung der behavioralen Leistung erzielt werden kann. Demnach stellt die tDCS auch im klinischen Kontext ein vielversprechendes Verfahren zur Restitution beeinträchtigter Funktionen des Gedächtnisses infolge der Alzheimer-Krankheit oder der Aphasie nach einem Schlaganfall dar. Jedoch gibt es bisher nur wenige Befunde aus randomisierten, placebokontrollierten klinischen Studien. Die Ergebnisse der tDCS-induzierten Leistungsverbesserung bei Patienten mit (Prä-)Demenz deuten darauf hin, dass eine mit einem Gedächtnistraining kombinierte Stimulation zu Verbesserungen führen könnte. Die frühe Intervention bereits im Stadium der leichten kognitiven Beeinträchtigung könnte dabei entscheidend sein, bedarf aber weiterer Studien. Bei Patienten mit schlaganfallbedingter Aphasie zeigten sich unterschiedliche Erfolge links- oder rechtshemisphärischer tDCS je nach Polarität und Schwere der Symptomatik. Patienten mit leichter Aphasie könnten hierbei besonders von der Stimulation der sprachdominanten Hirnhälfte profitieren, während bei schwerer Aphasie ein Ausweichen auf rechtshemisphärische homologe Areale Erfolg versprechend ist. Auch hier könnte die Applikation der tDCS bereits im subakuten Stadium besonders vielversprechend sein. Insgesamt eröffnet die tDCS also die Möglichkeit der Funktionsrestitution bei neurologischen Patienten. Ob die Stimulation in der Praxis eingesetzt werden kann, um weiteren Funktionsverlust bei neurodegenerativen Prozessen zu verhindern, und ob die in experimentellen Studien gezeigten Verbesserungen auch langfristig die Alltagsaktivitäten verbessern, muss in künftigen Studien geklärt werden.

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been successfully used in neuroscientific research to modulate cognitive functions. Recent studies suggested that improvement of behavioral performance is associated with tDCS-induced modulation of neuronal activity and connectivity. Thus, tDCS may also represent a promising tool for reconstitution of cognitive functions in the context of memory decline related to Alzheimer’s disease or aphasia following stroke; however, evidence from randomized sham-controlled clinical trials is still scarce. Initial results of tDCS-induced behavioral improvement in patients with Alzheimer’s dementia and its precursors indicated that an intense memory training combined with tDCS may be effective. Early interventions in the stage of mild cognitive impairment could be crucial but further evidence is needed to substantiate this. In patients with aphasia following stroke tDCS was applied to the left and right hemispheres, with varying results depending on the severity of the symptoms and polarity of the stimulation. Patients with mild aphasia can benefit from tDCS of the language dominant hemisphere while in patients with severe aphasia tDCS of right hemispheric homologous brain language areas may be particularly relevant. Moreover, recent studies suggested that an intervention in the subacute phase of aphasia could be most promising. In summary, tDCS could provide the exciting possibility to reconstitute cognitive functions in patients with neurological disorders. Future studies have to elucidate whether tDCS can be used in the clinical routine to prevent further cognitive decline in neurodegenerative diseases and whether beneficial effects from experimental studies translate into long-term improvement in activities of daily life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Bachtiar V, Near J, Johansen-Berg H et al (2015) Modulation of GABA and resting state functional connectivity by transcranial direct current stimulation. eLife 4:e08789

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker JM, Rorden C, Fridriksson J (2010) Using transcranial direct-current stimulation to treat stroke patients with aphasia. Stroke 41:1229–1236

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Berthier ML, Pulvermuller F, Davila G et al (2011) Drug therapy of post-stroke aphasia: a review of current evidence. Neuropsychol Rev 21:302–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boggio PS, Ferrucci R, Mameli F et al (2012) Prolonged visual memory enhancement after direct current stimulation in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Stimul 5:223–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boggio PS, Khoury LP, Martins DC et al (2009) Temporal cortex direct current stimulation enhances performance on a visual recognition memory task in Alzheimer disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 80:444–447

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brady MC, Kelly H, Godwin J et al (2012) Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012(5):CD000425

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cotelli M, Manenti R, Brambilla M et al (2014) Anodal tDCS during face-name associations memory training in Alzheimer’s patients. Front Aging Neurosci 6:38

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferrucci R, Mameli F, Guidi I et al (2008) Transcranial direct current stimulation improves recognition memory in Alzheimer disease. Neurology 71:493–498

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fiori V, Coccia M, Marinelli CV et al (2011) Transcranial direct current stimulation improves word retrieval in healthy and nonfluent aphasic subjects. J Cogn Neurosci 23:2309–2323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Floel A (2014) tDCS-enhanced motor and cognitive function in neurological diseases. Neuroimage 85(3):934–947

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Floel A, Meinzer M, Kirstein R et al (2011) Short-term anomia training and electrical brain stimulation. Stroke 42:2065–2067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fridriksson J, Richardson JD, Baker JM et al (2011) Transcranial direct current stimulation improves naming reaction time in fluent aphasia: a double-blind, sham-controlled study. Stroke 42:819–821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Holland R, Crinion J (2012) Can tDCS enhance treatment of aphasia after stroke? Aphasiology 26:1169–1191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Holland R, Leff AP, Josephs O et al (2011) Speech facilitation by left inferior frontal cortex stimulation. Curr Biol 21:1403–1407

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hsu WY, Zanto TP, Anguera JA et al (2015) Delayed enhancement of multitasking performance: effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on the prefrontal cortex. Cortex 69:175–185

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Jonsson L, Berr C (2005) Cost of dementia in Europe. Eur J Neurol 12(Suppl 1):50–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jung IY, Lim JY, Kang EK et al (2011) The factors associated with good responses to speech therapy combined with transcranial direct current stimulation in post-stroke aphasic patients. Ann Rehabil Med 35:460–469

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kang EK, Kim YK, Sohn HM et al (2011) Improved picture naming in aphasia patients treated with cathodal tDCS to inhibit the right Broca’s homologue area. Restor Neurol Neurosci 29:141–152

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Khedr EM, Gamal NF, El-Fetoh NA et al (2014) A double-blind randomized clinical trial on the efficacy of cortical direct current stimulation for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci 6:275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kuo MF, Nitsche MA (2012) Effects of transcranial electrical stimulation on cognition. Clin EEG Neurosci 43:192–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mangialasche F, Solomon A, Winblad B et al (2010) Alzheimer’s disease: clinical trials and drug development. Lancet Neurol 9:702–716

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Marangolo P, Fiori V, Paola M Di et al (2013) Differential involvement of the left frontal and temporal regions in verb naming: a tDCS treatment study. Restor Neurol Neurosci 31:63–72

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Marangolo P, Fiori V, Sabatini U et al (2016) Bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation language treatment enhances functional connectivity in the left hemisphere: preliminary data from aphasia. J Cogn Neurosci 28:724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Meinzer M, Darkow R, Lindenberg R et al (2016) Electrical stimulation of the motor cortex enhances treatment outcome in post-stroke aphasia. Brain 139:1152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Meinzer M, Lindenberg R, Antonenko D et al (2013) Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation temporarily reverses age-associated cognitive decline and functional brain activity changes. J Neurosci 33:12470–12478

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Meinzer M, Lindenberg R, Phan MT et al (2015) Transcranial direct current stimulation in mild cognitive impairment: behavioral effects and neural mechanisms. Alzheimers Dement 11:1032–1040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Monti A, Cogiamanian F, Marceglia S et al (2008) Improved naming after transcranial direct current stimulation in aphasia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 79:451–453

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nitsche MA, Paulus W (2000) Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol 527(3):633–639

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Paulus W, Antal A, Nitsche MA (2012) Physiological basis and methodological aspects of transcranial electric stimulation (tDCS, tACS, and tRNS). In: Miniussi C, Paulus W, Rossini PM (Hrsg) Transcranial brain stimulation. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  30. Prehn K, Floel A (2015) Potentials and limits to enhance cognitive functions in healthy and pathological aging by tDCS. Front Cell Neurosci 9:355

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Sperling RA, Aisen PS, Beckett LA et al (2011) Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 7:280–292

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Suemoto CK, Apolinario D, Nakamura-Palacios EM et al (2014) Effects of a non-focal plasticity protocol on apathy in moderate Alzheimer’s disease: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Brain Stimul 7:308–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Vines BW, Norton AC, Schlaug G (2011) Non-invasive brain stimulation enhances the effects of melodic intonation therapy. Front Psychol 2:230

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Wu D, Wang J, Yuan Y (2015) Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on naming and cortical excitability in stroke patients with aphasia. Neurosci Lett 589:115–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. You DS, Kim DY, Chun MH et al (2011) Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the right Wernicke’s area improves comprehension in subacute stroke patients. Brain Lang 119:1–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Flöel.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

D. Antonenko und A. Flöel geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Antonenko, D., Flöel, A. Nichtinvasive Stimulationsverfahren in der Neurologie. Nervenarzt 87, 838–845 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-016-0115-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-016-0115-z

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation