Zusammenfassung
Transkranielle Magnetstimulation (TMS) ist nicht nur eine höchst elegante Methode, um in der neurowissenschaftlichen Grundlagenforschung mittels transienter Läsionen kausale Struktur-Funktions-Zusammenhänge zu untersuchen, sondern auch aus klinischer Sicht ein vielversprechendes Verfahren für die Augmentationstherapie bei mittel- bis schwergradigen depressiven Episoden. Dieser Übersichtsartikel skizziert die methodischen Grundlagen der TMS und beleuchtet das neuromodulatorische Potenzial des Verfahrens anhand jüngster Studienergebnisse, die in den Domänen Emotionsregulation und soziale Kognition erzielt wurden. Vor diesem empirischen Hintergrund wird deutlich, dass präklinische Studien an gesunden Probandenkollektiven von eminenter Bedeutung sind, um innovative Stimulationsprotokolle zu entwickeln und funktionell relevante Zielorte zu definieren, die in klinischen Studien auf ihr therapeutisches Potenzial geprüft werden können. Des Weiteren werden die Perspektiven und Grenzen einer individualisierten TMS-Neuronavigation auf der Basis von aufgabenunabhängigen Konnektivitäts- und aufgabenspezifischen Aktivitätsmessungen aufgezeigt.
Summary
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is not only a highly elegant method for basic neuroscientific research that employs transient lesions to explore the relationship between brain structure and function but in a clinical context it is also a very promising approach to augmentation therapy in middle to severe grade depressive episodes. This overview illustrates the methodological basis of TMS and illuminates its neuromodulatory potential with reference to findings from recent studies on emotion regulation and social cognition. Against this empirical background, it becomes clear that preclinical studies on healthy participants are extremely important to develop innovative stimulation protocols and define functionally relevant target regions to be tested in clinical studies for therapeutic efficacy. Finally, the perspectives and limitations of functionally guided, individualized TMS neuronavigation will be explored based on task-independent connectivity and task-dependent activity measurements.
Literatur
Ahdab R, Ayache SS, Brugières P et al (2010) Comparison of „standard“ and „navigated“ procedures of TMS coil positioning over motor, premotor and prefrontal targets in patients with chronic pain and depression. Neurophysiol Clin Neurophysiol 40:27–36
Baeken C, Leyman L, De Raedt R et al (2008) Left and right High Frequency repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex does not affect mood in female volunteers. Clin Neurophysiol 119:568–575
Baeken C, De Raedt R, Van Schuerbeek P et al (2010) Right prefrontal HF-rTMS attenuates right amygdala processing of negatively valenced emotional stimuli in healthy females. Behav Brain Res 214:450–455
Chambers CD, Payne JM, Stokes MG, Mattingley JB (2004) Fast and slow parietal pathways mediate spatial attention. Nat Neurosci 7:217–218
Eisenegger C, Treyer V, Fehr E, Knoch D (2008) Time-course of „off-line“ prefrontal rTMS effects – a PET study. NeuroImage 42:379–384
Fitzgerald PB, Hoy K, McQueen S et al (2009) A randomized trial of rTMS targeted with MRI based neuro-navigation in treatment-resistant depression. Neuropsychopharmacology 34:1255–1262
Fox MD, Buckner RL, Liu H et al (2014) Resting-state networks link invasive and noninvasive brain stimulation across diverse psychiatric and neurological diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:E4367–E4375
Fox MD, Buckner RL, White MP et al (2012) Efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation targets for depression is related to intrinsic functional connectivity with the subgenual cingulate. Biol Psychiatry 72:595–603
Fox MD, Liu H, Pascual-Leone A (2013) Identification of reproducible individualized targets for treatment of depression with TMS based on intrinsic connectivity. NeuroImage 66:151–160
George MS, Wassermann EM, Williams WA et al (1996) Changes in mood and hormone levels after rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the prefrontal cortex. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 8(2):172–180
Herwig U, Padberg F, Unger J et al (2001) Transcranial magnetic stimulation in therapy studies: examination of the reliability of „standard“ coil positioning by neuronavigation. Biol Psychiatry 50:58–61
Herwig U, Satrapi P, Schönfeldt-Lecuona C (2003) Using the international 10-20 EEG system for positioning of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Topogr 16:95–99
Hoogendam JM, Ramakers GMJ, Di Lazzaro V (2010) Physiology of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human brain. Brain Stimul 3:95–118
Huang Y-Z, Edwards MJ, Rounis E et al (2005) Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron 45:201–206
Hurlemann R, Arndt S, Schlaepfer TE et al (2015) Diminished appetitive startle modulation following targeted inhibition of prefrontal cortex. Sci Rep 5:8954
Jeurissen D, Sack AT, Roebroeck A et al (2014) TMS affects moral judgment, showing the role of DLPFC and TPJ in cognitive and emotional processing. Front Neurosci 8:18
Kelly YT, Webb TW, Meier JD et al (2014) Attributing awareness to oneself and to others. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:5012–5017
Knoch D, Gianotti LRR, Pascual-Leone A et al (2006) Disruption of right prefrontal cortex by low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation induces risk-taking behavior. J Neurosci 26:6469–6472
Knoch D, Pascual-Leone A, Meyer K et al (2006) Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex. Science 314:829–832
Knoch D, Schneider F, Schunk D et al (2009) Disrupting the prefrontal cortex diminishes the human ability to build a good reputation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:20895–20899
Ko JH, Monchi O, Ptito A et al (2008) Theta burst stimulation-induced inhibition of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex reveals hemispheric asymmetry in striatal dopamine release during a set-shifting task – a TMS-[ 11 C]raclopride PET study. Eur J Neurosci 28:2147–2155
Di Lazzaro V, Dileone M, Pilato F et al (2011) Modulation of motor cortex neuronal networks by rTMS: comparison of local and remote effects of six different protocols of stimulation. J Neurophysiol 105:2150–2156
Lefaucheur J-P, André-Obadia N, Antal A et al (2014) Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clin Neurophysiol 125:2150–2206
Liston C, Chen AC, Zebley BD et al (2014) Default mode network mechanisms of transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression. Biol Psychiatry 76:517–526
Mosimann UP, Rihs TA, Engeler J et al (2000) Mood effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of left prefrontal cortex in healthy volunteers. Psychiatry Res 94:251–256
Van Overwalle F (2009) Social cognition and the brain: a meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 30:829–858
Pascual-Leone A, Bartres-Fazf D, Keenan JP (1999) Transcranial magnetic stimulation: studying the brain–behaviour relationship by induction of „virtual lesions“. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 354:1229–1238
Pascual-Leone A, Catala MD, Pascual AP-L (1996) Lateralized effect of rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of the prefrontal cortex on mood. Neurology 46:499–502
Peterchev AV, Wagner TA, Miranda PC et al (2012) Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation dose: definition, selection, and reporting practices. Brain Stimul 5:435–453
Rounis E, Lee L, Siebner HR et al (2005) Frequency specific changes in regional cerebral blood flow and motor system connectivity following rTMS to the primary motor cortex. NeuroImage 26:164–176
Sack AT, Kadosh RC, Schuhmann T et al (2009) Optimizing functional accuracy of TMS in cognitive studies: a comparison of methods. J Cogn Neurosci 21:207–221
Strafella AP (2003) Striatal dopamine release induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. Brain 126:2609–2615
Strafella AP, Paus T, Barrett J, Dagher A (2001) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human prefrontal cortex induces dopamine release in the caudate nucleus. J Neurosci 21:1–4
Strang S, Gross J, Schuhmann T et al (2015) Be nice if you have to – the neurobiological roots of strategic fairness. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 10:790–796
Wang JX, Rogers LM, Gross EZ et al (2014) Targeted enhancement of cortical-hippocampal brain networks and associative memory. Science 345:1054–1057
Wang JX, Voss JL (2015) Long-lasting enhancements of memory and hippocampal-cortical functional connectivity following multiple-day targeted noninvasive stimulation. Hippocampus 25(8):877–883
Young L, Camprodon JA, Hauser M et al (2010) Disruption of the right temporoparietal junction with transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces the role of beliefs in moral judgments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:6753–6758
Zwanzger P, Steinberg C, Rehbein MA et al (2014) Inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex modulates early affective processing. NeuroImage 101:193–203
Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien
Interessenkonflikt. C. Mielacher, D. Scheele und R. Hurlemann geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
R. Hurlemann ist Leiter der Arbeitsgruppe NEMO (Neuromodulation of Emotion), Universitätsklinikum Bonn.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mielacher, C., Scheele, D. & Hurlemann, R. Experimentelle und therapeutische Neuromodulation von Emotion und sozialer Kognition mit nichtinvasiver Hirnstimulation. Nervenarzt 86, 1500–1507 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-015-4324-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-015-4324-7
Schlüsselwörter
- Transkranielle Magnetstimulation
- Virtuelle Läsionen
- Stimulationsziele
- Funktionelle Konnektivität
- Dorsolateraler Präfrontalkortex