Skip to main content
Log in

Cladribin

Entwicklung einer oralen Formulierung zur Behandlung der Multiplen Sklerose

Cladribin

Development of an oral formulation for the treatment of multiple sclerosis

  • Übersichten
  • Published:
Der Nervenarzt Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Bei der Multiplen Sklerose (MS) handelt es sich um eine chronische immunvermittelte Erkrankung des Zentralnervensystems, bei der autoreaktive CD4+- und CD8+-T-Lymphozyten, B-Lymphozyten, Makrophagen, Antikörper und Zytokine Markscheiden angreifen und Axone schädigen. Die gegenwärtig zur Verfügung stehenden Basistherapeutika bzw. krankheitsmodifizierenden Medikamente für MS erfordern regelmäßige und häufige parenterale Gaben; die Langzeit-Compliance ist dementsprechend unbefriedigend. Von allen derzeit in der Entwicklung befindlichen neuen, oralen MS-Mitteln ist Cladribin die einzige Substanz, bei der eine nur kurzzeitige Gabe mit langen therapiefreien Intervallen möglich erscheint. Cladribin ist ein Immunmodulator mit lang anhaltender Wirkung und einem auf der Grundlage einer über 15-jährigen Anwendungserfahrung mit der parenteralen Darreichungsform bei MS und anderen Indikationen gut charakterisierten Sicherheitsprofil. Neben dem Bedarf an neuen MS-Therapien zur Verbesserung der Compliance werden in der vorliegenden Arbeit auch der Wirkmechanismus von Cladribin, die zur Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit verfügbaren Daten sowie die klinische Entwicklung der oralen Cladribin-Formulierung beschrieben. Die jüngst veröffentlichten Ergebnisse der 96-wöchigen, doppelblinden, randomisierten, placebokontrollierten Multicenterstudie CLARITY (CLAdRIbine Tablets Treating MS OrallY) sind vielversprechend. Diese Studie belegt die Wirksamkeit von oralem Cladribin: Das Medikament reduziert die Schubrate, die Behinderungsprogression und die MR-Parameter der Krankheitsaktivität und -last.

Summary

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, immune-mediated disease of the central nervous system in which autoreactive CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, macrophages, antibodies, and cytokines attack the myelin sheaths and damage the axons. The basic therapeutic agents and disease-modifying drugs that are currently available for MS require regular and frequent parenteral administration and therefore long-term compliance is unsatisfactory. Among all of the new oral MS agents presently under development, cladribine is the only substance that appears able to achieve long treatment-free intervals after only short-term administration. Cladribine is an immunomodulator with a long-lasting effect and a well-characterized safety profile based on over 15 years of experience with the parenteral route for MS and other indications. This contribution addresses the need for novel MS treatment approaches to improve compliance and describes the mechanism of action of cladribine, the available data on effectivity and safety, and the clinical development of the oral formulation of cladribine. The results from the recently published 96-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study CLARITY (CLAdRIbine Tablets Treating MS OrallY) are very promising. They clearly show that oral cladribine reduces relapse rate, disability progression and disease activity and burden as evidenced by MRI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Literatur

  1. Noseworthy JH, Lucchinetti C, Rodriguez M, Weinshenker BG (2000) Multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 343:938–952

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hohlfeld R, Wekerle H (2004) Autoimmune concepts of multiple sclerosis as a basis for selective immunotherapy: from pipe dreams to (therapeutic) pipelines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(2):14599–14606

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen BA, Rieckmann P (2007) Emerging oral therapies for multiple sclerosis. Int J Clin Pract 61:1922–1930

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Río J, Porcel J, Téllez N et al (2005) Factors related with treatment adherence to interferon beta and glatiramer acetate therapy in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 11:306–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cox D, Stone J (2006) Managing self-injection difficulties in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. J Neurosci Nurs 38:167–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen BA (2006) Adherence to disease-modifying therapy for multiple sclerosis. Int J MS Care [February Suppl]:32–37

  7. Cramer JA, Cuffel BJ, Divan V et al (2006) Patient satisfaction with an injection device for multiple sclerosis treatment. Acta Neurol Scand 113:156–162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tremlett HL, Oger J (2003) Interrupted therapy: stopping and switching of the beta-interferons prescribed for MS. Neurology 61:551–554

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stone VE (2001) Strategies for optimizing adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy: lessons from research and clinical practice. Clin Infect Dis 33:865–872

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Atkinson MJ, Sinha A, Hass SL et al (2004) Validation of a general measure of treatment satisfaction, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), using a national panel study of chronic disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2:12–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fallowfield L, Atkins L, Catt S et al (2006) Patients‘ preference for administration of endocrine treatments by injection or tablets: results from a study of women with breast cancer. Ann Oncol 17:205–210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu G, Franssen E, Fitch MI, Warner E (1997) Patient preferences for oral versus intravenous palliative chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 15:110–115

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Reginster JY, Rabenda V (2006) Patient preference in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis with bisphosphonates. Clin Interv Aging 1:415–423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kruk ME, Schwalbe N (2006) The relation between intermittent dosing and adherence: preliminary insights. Clin Ther 28:1989–1995

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Haynes RB, Yao X, Degani A et al (2005) Interventions to enhance medication adherence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD000011

  16. Hemmer B, Hartung HP (2007) Toward the development of rational therapies in multiple sclerosis: what is on the horizon? Ann Neurol 62:314–326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Carson DA, Wasson DB, Taetle R, Yu A (1983) Specific toxicity of 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine toward resting and proliferating human lymphocytes. Blood 62:737–743

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sipe JC (2005) Cladribine for multiple sclerosis: review and current status. Expert Rev Neurother 5:721–727

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Carson DA, Kaye J, Seegmiller JE (1977) Lymphospecific toxicity in adenosine deaminase deficiency and purine nucleoside phosphorylase deficiency: possible role of nucleoside kinase(s). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 74:5677–5681

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Liliemark J (1997) The clinical pharmacokinetics of cladribine. Clin Pharmacokinet 32:120–131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kawasaki H, Carrera CJ, Piro LD et al (1993) Relationship of deoxycytidine kinase and cytoplasmic 5’-nucleotidase to the chemotherapeutic efficacy of 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine. Blood 81:597–601

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rice GP, Filippi M, Comi G (2000) Cladribine and progressive MS: clinical and MRI outcomes of a multicenter controlled trial. Cladribine MRI Study Group. Neurology 54:1145–1155

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kopadze T, Dobert M, Leussink VI et al (2009) Cladribine impedes in vitro migration of mononuclear cells: a possible implication for treating multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol

  24. Leist TP, Vermersch P (2007) The potential role for cladribine in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: clinical experience and development of an oral tablet formulation. Curr Med Res Opin 23:2667–2676

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Janiec K, Wajgt A, Kondera-Anasz Z (2001) Effect of immunosuppressive cladribine treatment on serum leucocytes system in two-year clinical trial in patients with chronic progressive multiple sclerosis. Med Sci Monit 7:93–98

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bartosik-Psujek H, Belniak E, Mitosek-Szewczyk K et al (2004) Interleukin-8 and RANTES levels in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RR-MS) treated with cladribine. Acta Neurol Scand 109:390–392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Laugel B, Challier J, Siegfried C et al (2008) Cladribine exerts a modulatory effect of T cell activation. Mult Scler 14:S52–S53

    Google Scholar 

  28. Juliusson G, Christiansen I, Hansen MM et al (1996) Oral cladribine as primary therapy for patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 14:2160–2166

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ogura M, Morishima Y, Kobayashi Y et al (2004) Durable response but prolonged cytopenia after cladribine treatment in relapsed patients with indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas: results of a Japanese phase II study. Int J Hematol 80:267–277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Saven A, Piro LD (1994) 2-Chlorodeoxyadenosine: a newer purine analog active in the treatment of indolent lymphoid malignancies. Ann Intern Med 120:784–791

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schirmer M, Mur E, Pfeiffer KP et al (1997) The safety profile of low-dose cladribine in refractory rheumatoid arthritis. A pilot trial. Scand J Rheumatol 26:376–379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Davis JC, Austin H Jr, Boumpas D III et al (1998) A pilot study of 2-chloro-2’-deoxyadenosine in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus-associated glomerulonephritis. Arthritis Rheum 41:335–343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Beutler E, Sipe J, Romine J et al (1996) Treatment of multiple sclerosis and other autoimmune diseases with cladribine. Semin Hematol 33(1):45–52

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Beutler E, Sipe JC, Romine JS et al (1996) The treatment of chronic progressive multiple sclerosis with cladribine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:1716–1720

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Romine JS, Sipe JC, Koziol JA et al (1999) A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of cladribine in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Proc Assoc Am Physicians 111:35–44

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sipe JC, Romine JS, Koziol JA et al (1994) Cladribine in treatment of chronic progressive multiple sclerosis. Lancet 344:9–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Saven A et al (1994) Newer purine analogues for the treatment of hairy-cell leukemia. N Engl J Med 330:691–697

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Guchelaar HJ, Schaafsma MR (1994) Clinical and toxicological aspects of the antineoplastic drug cladribine: a review. Ann Hematol 69:223–230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Larson RA et al (1996) Dose-escalation trial of cladribine using five daily intravenous infusions in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies. J Clin Oncol 14:188–195

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gilles S, Bennett M, Polliack A et al (2001) Unexpectedly high incidence of hypoplastic/aplastic foci in bone marrow biopsies of hairy cell leukemia patients in remission following 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine therapy. Eur J Haematol 66:7–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Beutler E (1992) Cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine). Lancet 340:952–956

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Cook S (2008) A combined analysis of data from four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of parenteral cladribine and one open-label pilot study to assess the safety and tolerability profile of repeated periods of cladribine treatment in patients with progressive or relapsing multiple sclerosis (P02.180). Neurology (American Academy of Neurology Meeting, Chicago 2008)

  43. Stelmasiak Z, Bartosik-Psujek H, Belniak-Legiec E, Mitosek-Szewczyk K (2000) The effect of cladribine on some parameters of blood and cerebrospinal fluid in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RR-MS). Ann Univ Mariae Curie Sklodowska [Med] 55:221–225

    Google Scholar 

  44. Guarnaccia J, Rinder H, Smith B (2008) Preferential effects of cladribine on lymphocyte subpopulations. Mult Scler 14:S45

    Google Scholar 

  45. Orlowski RZ (2004). Successful pregnancy after cladribine therapy for hairy cell leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma 45:187–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Giovannoni G, Comi G, Cook SD et al (2010) A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Oral Cladribine for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. NEJM online 20. Januar

  47. Rieckmann P, Giovannoni G, Cook SD et al (2008) Cladribine tablets in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: study design of the 2-year, Phase IIIb CLARITY (CLAdRibine tablets Treating multiple sclerosis orallY) extension study. Mult Scler 14:161–162

    Google Scholar 

  48. Montalban X, Cohen BA, Jeffery D et al (2007) Oral cladribine added to interferon beta-1a for active multiple sclerosis: a 96-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb study. Mult Scler 13(2):245 (P809)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Merck Serono (2008) Merck Serono Announces Initiation of the ORACLE MS Trial to Evaluate Cladribine Tablets in Patients at Risk of Developing Multiple Sclerosis. Available at: http://www merckserono net/corp merckserono/en/images/20080918_en_tcm112_21562 pdf. Accessed October 31, 2008

Download references

Danksagung

Die Autoren danken Dr. Nobert Zessack, MerckSerono, für die kritische Durchsicht, Dr. Patrick Küry, Düsseldorf, für die Hilfe bei den Abbildungen und Dr. Andrea Plant, Caudex Medical, für die technische Hilfe bei der Abfassung des Manuskripts.

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor weist auf folgende Beziehungen hin: Der korrespondierende Autor erklärt, mit Genehmigung des Rektors der HHU Honorare für Beratung, Vorträge und Tätigkeit in Steering Committees von folgenden Firmen erhalten zu haben: BayerSchering, BiogenIdec, BioMS, Genzyme, MerckSerono, Novartis, Teva, Sanofi Aventis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H.-P. Hartung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hartung, HP., Kieseier, B. & Aktas, O. Cladribin. Nervenarzt 81, 194–202 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-009-2878-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-009-2878-y

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation