Abstract
Cities are home to several species of pollinators that play an important role in the reproductive success of wild and cultivated plants that grow in these ecosystems and their surroundings. Pollution is a main driver of pollinator decline. Light and noise pollution are more intense in cities than in any other ecosystem. Although nocturnal pollinators are heavily exposed to these pollutants, their effect on bat pollination is still unknown. Our goal was to assess the effect of light and noise pollution on the main pollination components (pollinator visits, pollen transfer, pollen germination, fruit, and seed set) of the tropical tree, Ceiba pentandra, in a heavily urbanized ecosystem. We measured these components in sites with contrasting intensities of artificial light and anthropogenic noise and statistically assessed the direct and indirect effect of pollutants on pollination components using structural equation modeling. We found that noise and light pollution negatively affected the visits by the bats that pollinate C. pentandra. However, these negative effects did not affect posterior pollination components. In fact, the direct effect of light pollution on reproductive success was positive and greater than the indirect effects via pollinator visits. We suggest that illuminated trees may be able to sustain a large quantity of fruits and seeds because they produce more photosynthates due to greater light radiation and delayed leaf abscission. We conclude that, despite the negative effect of light and noise on pollinator visits, these pollutants did not significantly impact the reproductive success of C. pentandra.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Appel G, López-Baucell A, Rocha R, Meyer CFJ, Bobrowiec PED (n.d.) Habitat disturbance trumps moonlight effects on the activity of tropical insectivorous bats. Anim Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12706
Ayuntamiento de Mérida (2018) Plan de infraestructura verde. Ayuntamiento de Mérida, Yucatán. Available at: http://www.merida.gob.mx/sustentable/contenidos/doc/PlanInfraestructuraVerde.pdf. Accesed 5 January 2022
Baber JR, Crooks KR, Fristrup KM (2010) The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms. Trends Ecol Evol 25:180–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.08.002
Baker HG, Harris BJ (1959) Bat-pollination of the silk-cotton tree, Ceiba pentandra (L.) Gaeritn. (sensu lato), in Ghana. J West Afr Sci Assoc 4:1–9
Barrigón-Morillas JM, Rey-Gozalo G, Montes-González D, Atanasio-Moraga P, Vílchez-Gómez R (2018) Noise pollution and urban planning. Curr Pollut Rep 4:208–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-018-0095-7
Bennie J, Davies TW, Cruse D, Gaston KJ (2016) Ecological effects of artificial light at night on wild plants. J Ecol 104:611–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12551
Borges RM, Somanathan H, Kelber A (2016) Patterns and processes in nocturnal and crepuscular pollination services. Q Rev Biol 91:389–418. https://doi.org/10.1086/689481
Bunkley JP, McClure CJW, Kleist NJ, Francis CD, Barber JR (2015) Anthropogenic noise alters bat activity levels and echolocation calls. Glob Ecol Conserv 3:62–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2014.11.002
De Souza-Laurindo R, Vicentin-Vugoni J (2020) Diversity of fruits in Artibeus lituratus diet in urban and natural habitat in Brazil: a review. J Trop Ecol 36:65–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467419000373
Ditchkoff SS, Saalfeld ST, Gibson CJ (2006) Animal behavior in urban ecosystems: modifications due to human-induced stress. Urban Ecosyst 9:5–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-006-3262-3
Elliot SE, Irwin RE (2009) Effects of flowering plant density on pollinator visitation, pollen receipt, and seed production in Delphinium barbeyi (Ranunculaceae). Am J Bot 96:912–919. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0800260
Ellis EC, Ramankutty N (2008) Putting people in the map: anthropogenic biomes of the world. Front Ecol Environ 6:439–447. https://doi.org/10.1890/070062
Elmqvist T, Cox PA, Rainey WE, Pierson ED (1992) Restricted pollination on oceanic islands: pollination of Ceiba pentandra by flying foxes in Samoa. Biotropica 24:15–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/2388469
Ferrini F, Fini A, Mori J, Gori A (2021) Role of vegetation as a mitigating factor in the urban context. Sustainability 12:4247. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104247
Fleming TH, Geiselman C, Kress WJ (2009) The evolution of bat pollination: a phylogenetic perspective. Ann Bot 104:1017–1043. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp197
Francis CD, Kleist NJ, Ortega CP, Cruz A (2012) Noise pollution alters ecological services: enhanced pollination and disrupted seed dispersal. Proc R Soc B 279:2727–2735. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0230
Gaston KJ, Bennie J (2014) Demographic effects of artificial nighttime lighting on animal populations. Environ Rev 22:323–330. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2014-0005
Gómez-Baggethun E, Gren Å, Barton DN, Langemeyer J, McPhearson T, O’Farrell P, Andersson E, Hamstead Z, Kremer P (2013) Urban ecosystem services. In: Elmqvist T, Fragkias M, Goodness J, Güneralp B, Marcotullio PJ, McDonald RI, Parnell S, Schewenius M, Seto KC, Wilkinson C (eds) Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 175–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1_3
Gribel R, Gibbs PE, Queiroz AL (1999) Flowering phenology and pollination biology of Ceiba pentandra (Bombacaceae) in Central Amazonia. J Trop Ecol 15:247–263. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467499000796
Hall DM, Camilo GR, Tonietto RK, Ollerton J, Ahrne K, Arduser M, Ascher JS, Baldock KCR, Fowler R, Frankie G, Goulson D, Gunnarsson B, Hanley ME, Jackson JI, Langellotto G, Lowenstein D, Minor ES, Philpott SM, Potts SG, Sirohi MH, Spevak ES, Stone GN, Threlfall CG (2017) The city as a refuge for insect pollinators. Conserv Biol 31:24–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12840
Harrison T, Winfree R (2015) Urban drivers of plant-pollinator interactions. Funct Ecol 29:879–888. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12486
Hölker F, Wolter C, Perkin EK, Tockner K (2010) Light pollution as a biodiversity threat. Trends Ecol Evol 25:681–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.09.007
Jones G (2008) Sensory ecology: noise annoys foraging bats. Curr Biol 18:R1098–R10100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.10.005
Jung K, Threlfall CG (2018) Trait-dependent tolerance of bats to urbanization: a global meta-analysis. Proc R Soc B 285:20181222. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.1222
Kight CR, Swaddle JP (2011) How and why environmental noise impacts animals: an integrative, mechanistic review. Ecol Lett 14:1052–1061. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01664.x
Knop E, Zoller L, Ryser R, Gerpe C, Hörler M, Fontaine C (2017) Artificial light at night as a new threat to pollination. Nature 548:206–209. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23288
Kunz TH, Diaz CA (1995) Folivory in fruit-eating bats, with new evidence from Artibeus jamaicensis (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Biotropica 27:106–120. https://doi.org/10.2307/2388908
Lefcheck JS (2015) PiecewiseSEM: piecewise structural equation modelling in R for ecology, evolution, and systematics. Methods Ecol Evol 7:573–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12512
Lewanzik A, Voigt CC (2014) Artificial light puts ecosystem services of frugivorous bats at risk. J Appl Ecol 51:388–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12206
Lobo JA, Quesada M, Stoner KE, Fuchs E, Herrerías-Diego Y, Rojas J, Saborio G (2003) Factors affecting phenological patterns of bombacaceous trees in seasonal forests in Costa Rica and Mexico. Am J Bot 90:1054–1063. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.90.7.1054
Lobo JA, Quesada M, Stoner KE (2005) Effects of pollination by bats on the mating system of Ceiba pentandra (Bombacaceae) populations in two tropical life zones in Costa Rica. Am J Bot 92:370–376. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.92.2.370
Longcore T, Rich C (2004) Ecological light pollution. Front Ecol Environ 2:191–198. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0191:ELP]2.0.CO;2
Macgregor CJ, Scott-Brown A (2020) Nocturnal pollination: an overlooked ecosystem service vulnerable to environmental change. Emerg Top Life Sci 4:19–32. https://doi.org/10.1042/ETLS20190134
Macgregor CJ, Pocock MJO, Fox R, Evans DM (2015) Pollination by nocturnal Lepidoptera, and the effects of light pollution: a review. Ecol Entomol 40:187–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12174
Macgregor CJ, Evans DM, Fox R, Pocock MJO (2017) The dark side of street lighting: impacts on moths and evidence for the disruption of nocturnal pollen transport. Glob Change Biol 23:697–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13371
MacSwiney C, Bolivar-Cimé B, Clarke FM, Racey P (2012) Transient yellow colouration of the bat Artibeus jamaicensis coincides with pollen consumption. Mamm Biol 77:221–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2011.08.001
MacSwiney C, Bolivar-Cimé B, Alfaro-Bates R, Ortíz-Díaz JJ, Clarke FM, Racey P (2017) Pollen movement by the bat Artibeus jamaicensis (Chiroptera) in an agricultural landscape in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Mamm Res 62:189–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-016-0306-9
McDonald RI, Beatley T (2021) Biophilic cities for an urban century. In: McDonald RI, Beatley T (eds) Biophilic cities for an urban century: why nature is essential for the success of cities. Palgrave MacMillan, Cham, pp 1–22
McDonald RI, Marcotullio PJ, Güneralp B (2013) Urbanization and global trends in biodiversity and ecosystem services. In: Elmqvist T, Fragkias M, Goodness J, Güneralp B, Marcotullio PJ, McDonald RI, Parnell S, Schewenius M, Seto KC, Wilkinson C (eds) Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1_3
McKinney ML (2006) Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv 127:247–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.005
Meravi N, Prajapati SK (2020) Effect streetlight pollution on the photosynthetic efficiency of different plants. Biol Rhythm Res 51:67–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/09291016.2018.1518206
Miranda-Jácome A, Rodríguez-García R, Munguía-Rosas MA (2020) Bats and moths contribute to the reproductive success of the columnar cactus Pilosocereus leucocephalus. J Arid Environ 174:103990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2019.06.001
Morrison DW (1978) Lunar phobia in a neotropical fruit bat, Artibeus jamaicensis (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Anim Behav 26:852–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(78)90151-3
Munguía-Rosas MA, Sosa VJ, Jácome-Flores ME (2010) Pollination system of the Pilosocereus leucocephalus columnar cactus (tribe Cereeae) in eastern Mexico. Plant Biol 12:578–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2009.00254.x
Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501
Owen ACS, Cochard P, Durrant J, Farnworth B, Perkin EK, Seymoure B (2020) Light pollution is a driver of insect declines. Biol Conserv 241:108259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108259
Pennington TD, Sarukhán J (1998) Arboles tropicales de México: Manual para la identificación de las principales especies. Fondo de Cultura Económica, Ciudad de México
Pérez-Medina S, López-Falfán I (2015) Áreas verdes y arbolado en Mérida, Yucatán. Hacia una sostenibilidad urbana. Economía, Sociedad y Territorio 15:1–33
Piano E, Souffreau C, Merckx T, Baardsen LF, Backeljau T, Bonte D, Brans KI, Cours M, Dahirel M, Debortoli N, Decaestecker E, De Wolf K, Engelen JMT, Fontaneto D, Gianuca AT, Govaert L, Hanashiro FTT, Higuti J, Lens L, Martens K, Matheve H, Matthysen E, Pinseel E, Sablon R, Schön I, Stoks R, Van Doninck K, Van Dyck H, Vanormelingen P, Van Wichelen J, Vyverman W, De Meester L, Hendrickx F (2019) Urbanization drives cross-taxon declines in abundance and diversity at multiple spatial scales. Glob Change Biol 26:1196–1211. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14934
Quesada M, Stoner KE, Lobo JA, Herrerias-Diego Y, Palacios-Guevara C, Munguía-Rosas MA, O.-Salazar KA, Rosas-Guerrero V, (2004) Effects of forest fragmentation on pollinator activity and consequences for plant reproductive success and mating patterns in bat-pollinated bombacaceous trees. Biotropica 36:131–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2004.tb00305.x
R Core Team (2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/. Accesed 5 January 2022
Raven JA, Cockell CS (2006) Influence on photosynthesis of starlight, moonlight, planet light, and light pollution (Reflections on photosynthetically active radiation in the universe). Astrobiology 6:668–675. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2006.6.668
Russo D, Ancillotto (2015) Sensitivity of bats to urbanization: a review. Mamm Biol 80:205–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2014.10.003
Saldaña-Vázquez R, Munguía-Rosas MA (2013) Lunar phobia in bats and its ecological correlates: A meta-analysis. Mamm Biol 78:216–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2012.08.004
Schaub A, Ostwald J, Siemers BM (2008) Foraging bats avoid noise. J Exp Biol 211:3174–3180. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.022863
Seto KC, Güneralp B, Hutyra LR (2012) Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. PNAS 109:16083–16088. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211658109
Simon R, Holderied MW, von Helversen (2006) Size discrimination of hollow hemispheres by echolocation in a nectar feeding bat. J Exp Biol 209:3599–3609. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.02398
Singaravelan N, Marimuthu G (2004) Nectar feeding and pollen carrying from Ceiba pentandra by pteropodid bats. J Mammal 85:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1644/1545-1542(2004)085%3c0001:NFAPCF%3e2.0.CO;2
Singhal RK, Kumar M, Bose B (2019) Eco-physiological responses of artificial night light pollution in plants. Russ J Plant Physiol 66:190–202. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443719020134
Stone EL, Harris S, Jones G (2015) Impacts of artificial lighting on bats: a review of challenges and solutions. Mamm Biol 80:213–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2015.02.004
Straka TM, Wolf M, Gras P, Buchholz S, Voigt C (2019) Tree cover mediates the effect of artificial light on urban bats. Front Ecol Evol 27.https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00091
Sutherland S (1987) Why hermaphroditic plants produce many more flowers than fruits: experimental tests with Agave mckelveyana. Evolution 41:750–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1987.tb05850.x
Thimijan RW, Heins RD (1983) Photometric, radiometric and quantum light units of measure. A review of procedures for interconversion. HortScience 18:818–822
Villarroya-Villalba L, Casanelles-Abellaac J, Morettia M, Pinho P, Samson R, Van Mensel A, Chiron F, Zellweger F, Martin M, Obrist MK (2021) Response of bats and nocturnal insects to urban green areas in Europe. Basic Appl Ecol 51:59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2021.01.006
von Helversen D, von Helversen O (1999) Acoustic guide in a bat-pollinated flower. Nature 398:759–760. https://doi.org/10.1038/19648
Warren AD (1990) Predation of five species of Noctuidae at ultraviolet light by the western yellowjacket (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J Lepid Soc 44:32
Wenzel A, Grassa I, Belavadib VV, Tscharntke T (2020) How urbanization is driving pollinator diversity and pollination: a systematic review. Biol Conserv 241:108321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108321
Zamora-Crescencio P, Flores-Guido JS, Ruenes-Morales R (2009) Useful flora and its management in the southern cone from Yucatan state, Mexico. Polibotánica 28:227–250
Zidar C, Elisens W (2009) Sacred giants: depiction of bombacoideae on Maya ceramics in Mexico, Guatemala, and Belize. Econ Bot 63:119–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-009-9079-2
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to R Saldaña-Vázquez, C Ibarra-Cerdeña, and J Fraga-Berdugo for their comments on the first author’s thesis, from which this manuscript was derived. J Canul helped with the pollen count, and F Miss helped with field work. We thank all the owners that gave us access to trees in private areas.
Funding
This research was funded by the Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN (Cinvestav).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
HFD-C and MAM-R conceived and designed the experiments. HFD-C collected data, and MAM-R analyzed the data. MAM-R and HFD-C wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Communicated by Peter Schausberger
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dzul-Cauich, H.F., Munguía-Rosas, M.A. Negative effects of light pollution on pollinator visits are outweighed by positive effects on the reproductive success of a bat-pollinated tree. Sci Nat 109, 12 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-021-01783-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-021-01783-5