Advertisement

The Science of Nature

, 105:10 | Cite as

Keeping eggs warm: thermal and developmental advantages for parasitic cuckoos of laying unusually thick-shelled eggs

  • Canchao Yang
  • Qiuli Huang
  • Longwu Wang
  • Wei-Guo Du
  • Wei Liang
  • Anders Pape Møller
Original Paper

Abstract

Obligate brood parasites have evolved unusually thick-shelled eggs, which are hypothesized to possess a variety of functions such as resistance to puncture ejection by their hosts. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that obligate brood parasites lay unusually thick-shelled eggs to retain more heat for the developing embryo and thus contribute to early hatching of parasite eggs. By doing so, we used an infrared thermal imaging system as a non-invasive method to quantify the temperature of eggshells of common cuckoos (Cuculus canorus) and their Oriental reed warbler (Acrocephalus orientalis) hosts in an experiment that artificially altered the duration of incubation. Our results showed that cuckoo eggshells had higher temperature than host eggs during incubation, but also less fluctuations in temperature during incubation disturbance. Therefore, there was a thermal and hence a developmental advantage for brood parasitic cuckoos of laying thick-shelled eggs, providing another possible explanation for the unusually thick-shelled eggs of obligate brood parasites and earlier hatching of cuckoo eggs compared to those of the host.

Keywords

Acrocephalus orientalis Cuculus canorus Eggshell thickness Incubation interval Infrared thermal imaging 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Prof. Sven Thatje and two reviewers for their helpful comments. We thank Wenfeng Wang and Jianhua Ma from Zhalong National Nature Reserve, and Min Chen and Yungao Hu for their assistance with fieldwork, and the help and cooperation from Zhalong National Nature Reserve, Heilongjiang, China.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31672303 to CY, 31660617 to LW, 31472013, and 31772453 to WL), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-13-0761 to CY), and the Initial Fund Key Laboratories of Guizhou Province (grant No. 2011-4005) to LW.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

The experiments comply with the current laws of China, where they were performed. Fieldwork was carried out under the permission from Zhalong National Nature Reserves, China. Experimental procedures were in agreement with the Animal Research Ethics Committee of Hainan Provincial Education Centre for Ecology and Environment, Hainan Normal University (permit no. HNECEE-2012-003).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Antonov A, Stokke BG, Fossøy F, Liang W, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Yang C, Møller AP (2012) Why do parasitic birds lay strong-shelled eggs? Chin Birds 3(4):245–258.  https://doi.org/10.5122/cbirds.2012.0039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antonov A, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E (2006) Egg rejection in marsh warblers (Acrocephalus palustris) heavily parasitized by common cuckoos (Cuculus canorus). Auk 123(2):419–430.  https://doi.org/10.1642/0004-8038(2006)123[419:ERIMWA]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antonov A, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E (2008) Does the cuckoo benefit from laying unusually strong eggs? Anim Behav 76(6):1893–1900.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.08.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Antonov A, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E (2009) Evidence for egg discrimination preceding failed rejection attempts in a small cuckoo host. Biol Lett 5(2):169–171.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0645 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bán M, Barta Z, Muñoz AR, Takasu F, Nakamura H, Moskát C (2011) The analysis of common cuckoo’s egg shape in relation to its hosts’ in two geographically distant areas. J Zool 284(2):77–83.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00795.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Birkhead TR, Hemmings N, Spottiswoode CN, Mikulica O, Moskát C, Bán M, Schulze-Hagen K (2011) Internal incubation and early hatching in brood parasitic birds. Proc R Soc Lond B 278(1708):1019–1024.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1504 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blankespoor GW, Oolman J, Uthe C (1982) Eggshell strength and cowbird parasitism of red-winged blackbirds. Auk 99(2):363–365Google Scholar
  8. Blom J, Lilja C (2004) A comparative study of growth, skeletal development and eggshell composition in some species of birds. J Zool 262(4):361–369.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952836903004746 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Board RG, Fuller R (1994) Microbiology of the avian egg. Chapman & Hall, London.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3060-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brooker MG, Brooker LC (1991) Eggshell strength in cuckoos and cowbirds. Ibis 133(4):406–413.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1991.tb04589.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chance E (1940) The truth about the cuckoo. Country Life, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Davies NB (2000) Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats. T & AD, Poyser, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Davies NB (2011) Cuckoo adaptations: trickery and tuning. J Zool 284(1):1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00810.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dearborn DC, Page SM, Dainson M, Hauber ME, Hanley D (2017) Eggshells as hosts of bacterial communities: an experimental test of the antimicrobial egg coloration hypothesis. Ecl Evol 7(22):9711–9719.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3508 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deeming DC (2002) Avian incubation behaviour, environment and evolution. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Deeming DC (2004) Reptilian incubation: environment, evolution and behaviour. Nottingham, Nottingham University PressGoogle Scholar
  17. Dyrcz A, de Juana E (2016) Oriental reed-warbler (Acrocephalus orientalis). In: del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J, Christie DA, de Juana E (eds) Handbook of the birds of the world alive. Barcelona, Lynx EdicionsGoogle Scholar
  18. Dyrcz A, Nagata H (2002) Breeding ecology of the eastern great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus orientalis at Lake Kasumigaura, Central Japan. Bird Study 49(2):166–171.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00063650209461261
  19. DuRant SE, Hopkins WA, Hepp GR, Walters JR (2013) Ecological, evolutionary, and conservation implications of incubation temperature-dependent phenotypes in birds. Biol Rev 88(2):499–509.  https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12015
  20. Gaston AJ (1976) Brood parasitism by pied crested cuckoo Clamator jacobinus. J Anim Ecol 45(2):331–348.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3878
  21. Hemmings N, Birkhead TR (2016) Consistency of passerine embryo development and the use of embryonic staging in studies of hatching failure. Ibis 158(1):43–50.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12336 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hargitai R, Moskát C, Bán M, Gil D, López-Rull I, Solymos E (2010) Eggshell characteristics and yolk composition in the common cuckoo Cuculus canorus: are they adapted to brood parasitism? J Avian Biol 41(2):177–185.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-048X.2009.04818.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hawkins LR (2011) Egg shape and its effect on incubation temperature in brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater). Western Illinois University, MS ThesisGoogle Scholar
  24. Honza M, Picman J, Grim T, Novak V, Capek M, Mrlik V (2001) How to hatch from an egg of great structural strength? A study of the common cuckoo. J Avian Biol 32(3):249–255.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0908-8857.2001.320307.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Howe RW (1967) Temperature effects on embryonic development in insects. Annu Rev Entomol 12(1):15–42.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.12.010167.000311 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Igic B, Bragannza K, Hyland MM, Silyn-Roberts H, Cassey P, Grim T, Rutila J, Moskát C, Hauber ME (2011) Alternative mechanisms of increased eggshell hardness of avian brood parasites relative to host species. J R Soc Interface 8(64):1654–1664.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2011.0207 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Igic B, Hauber ME, Galbraith JA, Grim T, Dearborn DC, Brennan PLR, Moskát C, Choudary PK, Cassey P (2010) Comparison of micrometer- and scanning electron microscope-based measurements of avian eggshell thickness. J Field Ornithol 81(4):402–410.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1557-9263.2010.00296.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Igic B, Hauber ME, Moskát C, Grim T, Shawkey MD, Procházka P, Honza M (2017) Brood parasite and host eggshells undergo similar levels of decalcification during embryonic development. J Zool 301(3):165–173.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12408
  29. Jaeckle WB, Kiefer M, Childs B, Harper RG, Rivers JW, Peer BD (2012) Comparison of eggshell porosity and estimated gas flux between the brown-headed cowbird and two common hosts. J Avian Biol 43(6):486–490.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-048X.2012.05705.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johnsgard PA (1997) The avian brood parasites: deception at the nest. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  31. Krüger O (2011) Brood parasitism selects for no defence in a cuckoo host. Proc R Soc Lond B 278(1719):2777–2783.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.2629 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lack D (1968) Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Maurer G, Portugal SJ, Hauber ME, Mikšík I, Russell DGD, Cassey P (2015) First light for avian embryos: eggshell thickness and pigmentation mediate variation in development and UV exposure in wild bird eggs. Funct Ecol 29(2):209–218.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12314 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Braa AT (1991) Rejection behavior by common cuckoo hosts towards artificial brood parasite eggs. Auk 108(2):348–354Google Scholar
  35. Picman J (1989) Mechanism of increased puncture resistance of eggs of brown-headed cowbirds. Auk 106(4):577–583Google Scholar
  36. Picman J, Pribil S (1997) Is greater eggshell density an alternative mechanism by which parasitic cuckoos increase the strength of their eggs? J Ornithol 138(4):531–541.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01651384 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Portugal SJ, Hauber ME, Maurer G, Stokke BG, Grim T, Cassey P (2014) Rapid development of brood-parasitic cuckoo embryos cannot be explained by increased gas exchange through the eggshell. J Zool 293(4):219–226.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rahn H, Curran-Everett L, Booth DT (1988) Eggshell differences between parasitic and non-parasitic Icteridae. Condor 90(4):962–964.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1368865 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rohwer S, Spaw CD (1988) Evolutionary lag versus bill-size constraints: a comparative study of the acceptance of cowbird eggs by old hosts. Evol Ecol 2(1):27–36.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02071586 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rothstein SI (1975) An experimental and teleonomic investigation of avian brood parasitism. Condor 77(3):250–271.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1366221
  41. Rothstein SI, Robinson SK (1998) Parasitic birds and their hosts: studies in coevolution. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Soler JJ, Peralta-Sánchez JM, Martínez-Bueno M, Martín-Vivaldi M, Martín-Gálvez D, Vela AI, Briones V, Pérez-Contreras T (2012) Brood parasitism is associated with increased bacterial contamination of host eggs: bacterial loads of host and parasitic eggs. Biol J Linn Soc 103(103):836–848.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01672.x Google Scholar
  43. Soler M (2014) Long-term coevolution between avian brood parasites and their hosts. Biol Rev 89(3):688–704.  https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12075 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Soler M, Soler JJ, Martinez JG (1997) Great spotted cuckoos improve their reproductive success by damaging magpie host eggs. Anim Behav 54 (5):1227–1233.  https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1997.0524
  45. Spaw CD, Rohwer S (1987) A comparative study of eggshell thickness in cowbirds and other passerines. Condor 89(2):307–318.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1368483 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Spottiswoode CN, Colebrook-Robjent JR (2007) Egg puncturing by the brood parasitic greater honeyguide and potential host counteradaptations. Behav Ecol 18(4):792–799.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arm025
  47. Spottiswoode CN (2010) The evolution of host-specific variation in cuckoo eggshell strength. J Evol Biol 23(8):1792–1799.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02010.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Spottiswoode CN (2013) A brood parasite selects for its own egg traits. Biol Lett 9(5):21030573.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2013.0573 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Simkiss K (1961) Calcium metabolism and avian reproduction. Biol Rev 36(3):321–367.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1961.tb01292.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Swynnerton CFM (1918) Rejections by birds of eggs unlike their own: with remarks on some of the cuckoo problems. Ibis 60(1):127–154.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1918.tb00774.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang H, Xu S, Sun L (2006) Effects of climate change on evapotranspiration in Zhalong Wetland, Northeast China. Chin Geograph Sci 16(3):265–269.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-006-0265-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wyllie I (1981) The cuckoo. Batsford, LondonGoogle Scholar
  53. Yang C, Møller AP, Ma Z, Li F, Liang W (2014) Intensive nest predation by crabs produces source-sink dynamics in hosts and parasites. J Ornithol 155(1):219–223.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-013-1003-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yang C, Wang L, Liang W, Møller AP (2016a) Do common cuckoos (Cuculus canorus) possess an optimal laying behaviour to match their own egg phenotype to that of their Oriental reed warbler (Acrocephalus orientalis) hosts? Biol J Linn Soc 117(3):422–427.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12690 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yang C, Wang L, Liang W, Møller AP (2016b) Egg recognition as antiparasitism defence in hosts does not select for laying of matching eggs in parasitic cuckoos. Anim Behav 122:177–181.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.10.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yang C, Wang L, Liang W, Møller AP (2017) How cuckoos find and choose host nests for parasitism. Behav Ecol 28(3):859–865.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arx049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Ecology of Tropical Islands, College of Life SciencesHainan Normal UniversityHaikou 571158China
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Development Regulation, School of Life SciencesGuizhou Normal UniversityGuiyang 550001China
  3. 3.Key Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation BiologyChinese Academy of ScienceBeijing 100101China
  4. 4.Ecologie Systématique Evolution, CNRS, Université Paris-Sud, AgroParisTechUniversité Paris-SaclayOrsayFrance

Personalised recommendations