The Science of Nature

, 104:102 | Cite as

Postnatal nutrition influences male attractiveness and promotes plasticity in male mating preferences

  • José C. Noguera
  • Neil B. Metcalfe
  • Pat Monaghan
Original Paper


Poor early-life nutrition could reduce adult reproductive success by negatively affecting traits linked to sexual attractiveness such as song complexity. If so, this might favor strategic mate choice, allowing males with less complex songs to tailor their mating tactics to maximize the reproductive benefits. However, this possibility has been ignored in theoretical and empirical studies. By manipulating the micronutrient content of the diet (e.g., low or high) during the postnatal period of male zebra finches, we show for the first time (1) that males reared on a poor (low) micronutrient diet had less complex songs as adults; (2) that these males, in contrast to the high micronutrient diet group, were more selective in their mating strategies, discriminating against those females most likely to reduce their clutch size when paired with males having less complex songs; and (3) that by following different mating strategies, males reared on the contrasting diets obtained similar reproductive benefits. These results suggest that early-life dietary conditions can induce multiple and long-lasting effects on male and female reproductive traits. Moreover, the results seem to reflect a previously unreported case of adaptive plasticity in mate choice in response to a nutritionally mediated reduction in sexual attractiveness.


Differential allocation Fertility Mate choice Song Taeniopygia guttata 



We thank the animal care staff for their support and P. Surai for his advice with the micronutrient treatment. We also thank S. Cowan and L. Glen for their help during the experiment, R. Bassar and S. Auer for the constructive comments on the statistical analyses, and K. Buchanan and D. Gil for their advice with the song recordings. We also thank three anonymous referees for their comments which greatly improved the manuscript.

Author contributions

JCN, NBM, and PM conceived and designed the experiments. JCN performed the experiments and analyzed the data. JCN, NBM, and PM wrote the manuscript.

Funding information

JCN was supported by AXA Research fellowship (PDOC-2013-W1) and later on by a Juan de la Cierva Fellowship (IJCI-2014-20246), NBM by ERC Advanced Grant (322784), and PM by ERC Advanced Grant (268926).

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

The study was carried out with the permission of UK Home Office and all tests were subjected to local ethical review (Project License No. 60/4109).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

114_2017_1524_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (488 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 487 kb)


  1. Adar E, Lotem A et al (2008) The effect of social environment on singing behavior in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) and its implication for neuronal recruitment. Behav Brain Res 187:178–184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alonso-Alvarez C, Bertrand S et al (2006) An experimental manipulation of life-history trajectories and resistance to oxidative stress. Evolution 60:1913–1924CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Amundsen T (2000) Why are female birds ornamented? Trends Ecol Evol 15:149–155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Amundsen T, Forsgren E (2003) Male preference for colourful females affected by male size in a marine fish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amundsen T, Forsgren E et al (1997) On the function of female ornaments: male bluethroats prefer colourful females. Proc R Soc B 264:1579–1586CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Andersen SL (2003) Trajectories of brain development: point of vulnerability or window of opportunity? Neurosci Biobehav Rev 27:3–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Andersson MB (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  8. Ashworth CJ, Antipatis C (2001) Micronutrient programming of development throughout gestation. Reproduction 122:527–535CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Badás E, Martínez J et al (2015) Ageing and reproduction: antioxidant supplementation alleviates telomere loss in wild birds. J Evol Biol 28:896–905CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Balzer AL, Williams TD (1998) Do female zebra finches vary primary reproductive effort in relation to mate attractiveness? Behaviour 135:297–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bennett AT, Cuthill IC et al (1996) Ultraviolet vision and mate choice in zebra finches. Nature 380:433–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blount JD, Metcalfe NB et al (2003) Neonatal nutrition, adult antioxidant defences and sexual attractiveness in the zebra finch. Proc R Soc B 270:1691–1696CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Bolund E, Schielzeth H et al (2009) Compensatory investment in zebra finches: females lay larger eggs when paired to sexually unattractive males. Proc R Soc B 276:707–715CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bonaparte KM, Riffle-Yokoi C et al (2011) Getting a head start: diet, sub-adult growth, and associative learning in a seed-eating passerine. PLoS One 6:e23775CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Boogert NJ, Giraldeau L-A et al (2008) Song complexity correlates with learning ability in zebra finch males. Anim Behav 76:1735–1741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Buchanan KL, Leitner S et al (2004) Developmental stress selectively affects the song control nucleus HVC in the zebra finch. Proc R Soc B 271:2381–2386CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Buchanan KL, Spencer K et al (2003) Song as an honest signal of past developmental stress in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). Proc R Soc B 270:1149–1156CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Burley N (1986) Sexual selection for aesthetic traits in species with biparental care. Am Nat 127:415–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Burley N (1988) The differential-allocation hypothesis: an experimental test. Am Nat 132:611–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Burley N, Coopersmith CB (1987) Bill color preferences of zebra finches. Ethology 76:133–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Candolin U, Salesto T (2009) Does competition allow male mate choosiness in threespine sticklebacks? Am Nat 173:273–277CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Cate CT, Mug G (1984) The development of mate choice in zebra finch females. Behaviour 90:125–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Christians JK (2002) Avian egg size: variation within species and inflexibility within individuals. Biol Rev 77:1–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Clayton NS (1990) Assortative mating in zebra finch subspecies, Taeniopygia guttata guttata and T. g. castanotis. Philos Trans R Soc B 330:351–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Clutton-Brock TH (1984) Reproductive effort and terminal investment in iteroparous animals. Am Nat 123:212–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Collins SA, Hubbard C, Houtman, AM (1994) Female mate choice in the zebra finch ? the effect of male beak colour and male song. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35:21-25Google Scholar
  27. Crino OL, Prather CT et al (2014) Developmental stress increases reproductive success in male zebra finches. Proc R Soc B 281:20141266CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Edward DA, Chapman T (2011) The evolution and significance of male mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol 26:647–654CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Gil D, Naguib M et al (2006) Early condition, song learning, and the volume of song brain nuclei in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). J Neurobiol 66:1602–1612CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Gowaty PA (2008) Reproductive compensation. J Evol Biol 21:1189–1200CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Gowaty PA, Anderson WW et al (2007) The hypothesis of reproductive compensation and its assumptions about mate preferences and offspring viability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:15023–15027CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Griggio M, Hoi H (2010) Only females in poor condition display a clear preference and prefer males with an average badge. BMC Evol Biol 10:261PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Harris WE, Uller T (2009) Reproductive investment when mate quality varies: differential allocation versus reproductive compensation. Phil Trans R Soc B 364:1039–1048CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Heidinger BJ, Blount JD et al (2012) Telomere length in early life predicts lifespan. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:1743–1748CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Hill GE (1993) Male mate choice and the evolution of female plumage coloration in the house finch. Evolution 47:1515–1525CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Holveck M-J, de Castro ACV et al (2008) Accuracy of song syntax learning and singing consistency signal early condition in zebra finches. Behav Ecol 19:1267–1281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Holveck M-J, Geberzahn N et al (2011) An experimental test of condition-dependent male and female mate choice in zebra finches. PLoS One 6:e23974CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Holveck M-J, Riebel K (2010) Low-quality females prefer low-quality males when choosing a mate. Proc R Soc B 277:153–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Jennions MD, Petrie M (1997) Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol Rev 72:283–327CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kokko H, Härdling R (2005) The evolution of prudent choice. Evol Ecol Res 7:697–715Google Scholar
  42. Lande R (1980) Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34:292–305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Laubu C, Schweitzer C et al (2017) Mate choice based on behavioural type: do convict cichlids prefer similar partners? Anim Behav 126:281–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Liu R, Liu IY et al (2003) Reversal of age-related learning deficits and brain oxidative stress in mice with superoxide dismutase/catalase mimetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:8526–8531CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Lucas A, Morley R et al (2001) Nutrition and mental development. Nutrition Rev 59:S24–S33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Magurran AE, Seghers BH (1990) Risk sensitive courtship in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behaviour 112:194–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mahmoud KZ, Edens F et al (2004) Ascorbic acid decreases heat shock protein 70 and plasma corticosterone response in broilers (Gallus gallus domesticus) subjected to cyclic heat stress. Comp Biochem Phys B 137:35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mautz BS, Jennions MD (2011) The effect of competitor presence and relative competitive ability on male mate choice. Behav Ecol 22:769–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Metcalfe NB, Alonso-Alvarez C (2010) Oxidative stress as a life-history constraint: the role of reactive oxygen species in shaping phenotypes from conception to death. Funct Ecol 24:984–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Metcalfe NB, Monaghan P (2001) Compensation for a bad start: grow now, pay later? Trends Ecol Evol 16:254–260CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Monaghan P, Metcalfe NB et al (1996) Male finches selectively pair with fecund females. Proc R Soc B 263:1183–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mougeot F, Martinez-Padilla J et al (2007) Carotenoid-based colouration and ultraviolet reflectance of the sexual ornaments of grouse. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:741–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Noguera JC, Kim SY et al (2012) Pre-fledgling oxidative damage predicts recruitment in a long-lived bird. Biol Lett 8:61–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Noguera JC, Metcalfe NB et al (2015a) Sex-dependent effects of nutrition on telomere dynamics in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Biol Lett 11:20140938CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Noguera JC (2017) Interacting effects of early dietary conditions and reproductive effort on the oxidative costs of reproduction. PeerJ 5:e3094CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Noguera JC, Metcalfe NB et al (2015b) Are you what you eat? Micronutritional deficiencies during development influence adult personality-related traits. Anim Behav 101:129–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nordeen KW, Nordeen EJ (1992) Auditory feedback is necessary for the maintenance of stereotyped song in adult zebra finches. Behav Neural Biol 57:58–66CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Nowicki S, Searcy W et al (2002) Brain development, song learning and mate choice in birds: a review and experimental test of the “nutritional stress hypothesis”. J Comp Phys A 188:1003–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Parker G (1983) Mate quality and mating decisions. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 141–166Google Scholar
  60. Pianka ER, Parker WS (1975) Age-specific reproductive tactics. Am Nat:453–464Google Scholar
  61. Reichert S, Stier A et al (2014) Increased brood size leads to persistent eroded telomeres. Front Ecol Evol 22:2–9Google Scholar
  62. Riebel K (2009) Song and female mate choice in zebra finches: a review. Adv Study Behav 40:197–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rutstein AN, Brazill-Boast J et al (2007) Evaluating mate choice in the zebra finch. Anim Behav 74:1277–1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Saino N, Caprioli M et al (2011) Antioxidant defenses predict long-term survival in a passerine bird. PLoS One 6:e19593CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Sheldon BC (2000) Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications. Trends Ecol Evol 15:397–402CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Spencer K, Buchanan K et al (2003) Song as an honest signal of developmental stress in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). Horm Behav 44:132–139CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Spencer K, Buchanan K et al (2004) Developmental stress, social rank and song complexity in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). Proc R Soc B 271:S121–S123CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  69. Surai PF (2002) Natural antioxidants in avian nutrition and reproduction. Nottingham University Press, NottinghamGoogle Scholar
  70. Surai PF (2006) Selenium in nutrition and health. Nottingham University Press, NottinghamGoogle Scholar
  71. Tchernichovski O, Nottebohm F et al (2000) A procedure for an automated measurement of song similarity. Anim Behav 59:1167–1176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Trivers R (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell BG (ed) Sexual selection & the descent of man. Aldine de Gruyter, New York, pp 136–179Google Scholar
  73. Whittingham MJ, Stephens PA et al (2006) Why do we still use stepwise modelling in ecology and behaviour? J Anim Ecol 75:1182–1189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Williams TD (2012) Physiological adaptations for breeding in birds. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  75. Zann RA, Bamford M (1996) The zebra finch: a synthesis of field and laboratory studies. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Ecología y Biología Animal, Torre CACTIUniversidad de VigoVigoSpain
  2. 2.Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health & Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life SciencesUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations