Skip to main content

Similar burrow architecture of three arid-zone scorpion species implies similar ecological function

The Science of Nature volume 103, Article number: 56 (2016) Cite this article

Abstract

Many animals reside in burrows that may serve as refuges from predators and adverse environmental conditions. Burrow design varies widely among and within taxa, and these structures are adaptive, fulfilling physiological (and other) functions. We examined the burrow architecture of three scorpion species of the family Scorpionidae: Scorpio palmatus from the Negev desert, Israel; Opistophthalmus setifrons, from the Central Highlands, Namibia; and Opistophthalmus wahlbergii from the Kalahari desert, Namibia. We hypothesized that burrow structure maintains temperature and soil moisture conditions optimal for the behavior and physiology of the scorpion. Casts of burrows, poured in situ with molten aluminum, were scanned in 3D to quantify burrow structure. Three architectural features were common to the burrows of all species: (1) a horizontal platform near the ground surface, long enough to accommodate the scorpion, located just below the entrance, 2–5 cm under the surface, which may provide a safe place where the scorpion can monitor the presence of potential prey, predators, and mates and where the scorpion warms up before foraging; (2) at least two bends that might deter incursion by predators and may reduce convective ventilation, thereby maintaining relatively high humidity and low temperature; and (3) an enlarged terminal chamber to a depth at which temperatures are almost constant (±2–4 °C). These common features among the burrows of three different species suggest that they are important for regulating the physical environment of their inhabitants and that burrows are part of scorpions’ “extended physiology” (sensu Turner, Physiol Biochem Zool 74:798–822, 2000).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  • Abdel-Nabi I, McVean A, Abdel-Rahman M, Omran M (2004) Intraspecific diversity of morphological characters of the burrowing scorpion Scorpio maurus palmatus (Ehrenberg, 1828) in Egypt (Arachnida: Scorpionida). Serket 9:41–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Avenant NL, Nel JAJ (1997) Prey use by four syntopic carnivores in a strandveld ecosystem. South African J Wildl Res 27:86–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Begg CM, Begg KS, Du Toit JT, Mills MGL (2003) Sexual and seasonal variation in the diet and foraging behaviour of a sexually dimorphic carnivore, the honey badger (Mellivora capensis). J Zool London 260:301–316. doi:10.1017/S0952836903003789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownell P, Farley RD (1979) Prey-localizing behaviour of the nocturnal desert scorpion, Paruroctonus mesaensis: orientation to substrate vibrations. Anim Behav 27:185–193. doi:10.1016/0003-3472(79)90138-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownell P, van Hemmen JL (2001) Vibration sensitivity and a computational theory for prey-localizing behavior in sand scorpions. Am Zool 41:1229–1240

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullitt E, Gerig G, Pizer SM et al (2003) Measuring tortuosity of the intracerebral vasculature from MRA images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22:1163–1171. doi:10.1109/TMI.2003.816964

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Çolak M, Karataş A (2013) Shape of burrows built by Scorpio maurus L., 1758 (Scorpiones: Scorpionidae) from Turkey, with description of capture methods. Euscorpius 171:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford C, Riddle W (1975) Overwintering physiology of the scorpion Diplocentrus spitzeri. Physiol Zool 48:84–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1984) The extended phenotype: the gene as the unit of selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford, doi: 10.1016/0162-3095(84)90028-1

  • De Vries JL, Pirk CWW, Bateman PW et al (2011) Extension of the diet of an extreme foraging specialist, the aardwolf (Proteles cristata). African Zool 46:194–196. doi:10.3377/004.046.0113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doody JS, James H, Colyvas K et al (2015) Deep nesting in a lizard, deja vu devil’s corkscrews: first helical reptile burrow and deepest vertebrate nest. Biol J Linn Soc 116:13–26. doi:10.1111/bij.12589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eastwood EB (1978) Notes on the scorpion fauna of the Cape. Part 4. The burrowing activities of some scorpionids and buthids (Arachnida, Scorpionida). Ann South African Museum 75:249–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Eitel B, Eberle J, Kuhn R (2002) Holocene environmental change in the Otjiwarongo thornbush savanna (Northern Namibia): evidence from soils and sediments. Catena 47:43–62

  • Gefen E, Ar A (2004) Comparative water relations of four species of scorpions in Israel: evidence for phylogenetic differences. J Exp Biol 207:1017–1025. doi:10.1242/jeb.00860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hadley NF (1970a) Water relations of the desert scorpion, Hadrurus arizonensis. J Exp Biol 53:547–58

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hadley NF (1970b) Micrometeorology and energy exchange in two desert arthropods. Ecology 51:434–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadley NF (1990) Environmental physiology. In: Polis GA (ed) The biology of scorpions. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 321–340

  • Hansell M (1984) Animal architecture and building behavior. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansell M (2007) Built by animals: the natural history of animal architecture. Oxford University Press, Oxford, doi: 10.1086/592657

  • Harington A (1978) Burrowing biology of the scorpion Cheloctonus jonesii Pocock (Arachnida: Scorpionida: Scorpionidae). J Arachnol 5:243–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart WE, Goldbaum M, Côté B et al (1999) Measurement and classification of retinal vascular tortuosity. Int J Med Inform 53:239–252. doi:10.1016/S1386-5056(98)00163-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hembree DI, Johnson LM, Tenwalde RW (2012) Neoichnology of the desert scorpion Hadrurus arizonensis: burrows to biogenic cross lamination. Palaeontol Electron 15:1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • King D, Green B (1979) Notes on diet and reproduction of the sand goanna, Varanus gouldii rosenbergi. Copeia 1979:64–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinlaw A (1999) A review of burrowing by semi-fossorial vertebrates in arid environments. J Arid Environ 41:127–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinlaw A, Grasmueck M (2012) Evidence for and geomorphologic consequences of a reptilian ecosystem engineer: the burrowing cascade initiated by the gopher tortoise. Geomorphology 157–158:108–121. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.06.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch LE (1970) Predation of the scorpion, Urodacus hoplurus, by the lizard Varanus gouldi. West Aust Nat 11:120–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch L (1978) A comparative study of the structure, function and adaptation to different habitats of burrows in the scorpion genus Urodacus (Scorpionida, Scorpionidae). Rec West Aust Museum 6:119–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch LE (1981) The scorpions of Australia: aspects of their ecology and zoogeography. In: Keast A (ed) Ecol. Biogeogr. Aust. Vol. 2. W. Junk, The Hague, pp 873–884

  • Kotzman M, Lubin YD, Goldberg M (1989) Activities of a burrow-dwelling scorpion revealed at the surface. Acta Zool Fenn 190:205–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Krapf D (1986) Contact chemoreception of prey in hunting scorpions (Arachnida: Scorpiones). Zool Anz 217:119–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Krapf D (1988) Prey localization by trichobothria of scorpions. Proc. Eur. Arachnol. Colloquium, Berlin, pp 29–34

  • Lamoral BH (1978) Soil hardness, an important and limiting factor in burrowing scorpions of the genus Opisthophthalmus C.L. Koch, 1837 (Scorpionidae, Scorpinida). Symp Zool Soc London 42:171–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamoral B (1979) The scorpions of Namibia (Arachnida-Scorpionida). Annu Natal Museum 23:497–784

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy G, Amitai P (1980) Fauna Palaestina. Arachnida I: Scorpiones. The Israeli Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Jerusalem

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin LD, Bennett DK (1977) The burrows of the Miocene beaver Palaeocastor, Western Nebraska, U.S.A. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 22:173–193

  • McCormick SJ, Polis GA (1990) Prey, predators, and parasites. In: Polis GA (ed) The biology of scorpions. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 294–320

  • Meadows PS, Meadows A (1991) The environmental impact of burrowing animals and animal burrows. Symp Zool Soc London 63:349

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer RC (1999) Helical burrows as a palaeoclimate response: Daimonelix by Palaeocastor. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 147:291–298. doi:10.1016/S0031-0182(98)00157-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mineo MF, Del Claro K (2006) Mechanoreceptive function of pectines in the Brazilian yellow scorpion Tityus serrulatus: perception of substrate-borne vibrations and prey detection. Acta Ethol 9:79–85. doi:10.1007/s10211-006-0021-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monod L, Harvey MS, Prendini L (2013) Stenotopic Hormurus Thorell, 1876 scorpions from the monsoon ecosystems of northern Australia, with a discussion on the evolution of burrowing behaviour in Hormuridae Laurie, 1896. Rev Suisse Zool 120:281–346

  • Navidpour SH, Vazirianzadeh B, Mohammadi A (2015) Burrowing activities of Scorpio maurus townsendi (Arachnida: Scorpionida: Scorpionidae) in province of Khouzestan sw Iran. J Entomol Zool Stud 3:270–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Newlands G (1972a) Ecological adaptations of Kruger National Park scorpionids (Arachnida: Scorpionides). Koedoe 15:37–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newlands G (1972b) Notes on psammophilous scorpions and a description of a new species (Arachnida: Scorpionida). Ann Transvaal Museum 27:241–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Newlands G (1978) Arachnida (except Acari). Biogeogr. Ecol. South. Africa, Vol. 2. W. Junk, The Hague, pp 677–684

  • Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, et al. (2013) vegan: community ecology package.

  • Polis GA (1990) Ecology. In: Polis GA (ed) The biology of scorpions Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 247–293

  • Polis GA, Sissom WD, McCormick SJ (1981) Predators of scorpions: field data and a review. J Arid Environ 4:309–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Polis GA, Myers C, Quinlan M (1986) Burrow biology and spatial distribution of desert scorpions. J Arid Environ 10:137–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendini L (2001) Substratum specialization and speciation in southern African scorpions: the effect hypothesis revisited. In: Fet V, Selden PA (eds) Scorpions 2001. In Memoriam Gary A. Polis. British Arachnological Society, Burnham Beeches, Bucks, pp 113–138

  • Prendini L (2005) Scorpion diversity and distribution in southern Africa: pattern and process. In: Huber B, Sinclair BJ, Lampe K-H (eds) African Biodiversity Molecules, Organisms, Ecosystems, Proc. 5th Int. Symp. Trop. Biol. Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn. Springer, Verlag, New York, pp 25–68

  • Prendini L, Crowe TM, Wheeler WC (2003) Systematics and biogeography of the family Scorpionidae (Chelicerata: Scorpiones), with a discussion on phylogenetic methods. Invertebr Syst 17:185–259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing

  • Reichman O, Smith S (1990) Burrows and burrowing behavior by mammals. In: Genoways HH (ed) Curr. Mammal. Plenum Press, New York, New York, USA, pp 197–244

  • Robertson HG, Nicolson SW, Louw GN (1982) Osmoregulation and temperature effects on water loss and oxygen consumption in two species of African scorpion. Comp Biochem Physiol Part A Physiol 71:605–609. doi:10.1016/0300-9629(82)90210-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutin J (1996) The burrowing activity of scorpions (Scorpio maurus palmatus) and their potential contribution to the erosion of Hamra soils in Karkur, central Israel. Geomorphology 15:159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shachak M, Brand S (1983) The relationship between sit and wait foraging strategy and dispersal in the desert scorpion, Scorpio maurus palmatus. Oecologia 60:371–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shivashankar T (1992) The importance of burrowing for the scorpion Heterometrus fulvipes Koch (Arachnida). J Soil Biol Ecol 12:134–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Shivashankar T (1994) Advanced sub social behaviour in the scorpion Heterometrus fulvipes Brunner (Arachnida). J Biosci 19:81–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shorthouse D, Marples T (1980) Observations on the burrow and associated behaviour of the arid-zone scorpion Urodacus yaschenkoi (Birula). Aust J Zool 28:581–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skutelsky O (1996) Predation risk and state-dependent foraging in scorpions: effects of moonlight on foraging in the scorpion Buthus occitanus. Anim Behav 52:49–57. doi:10.1006/anbe.1996.0151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith G (1966) Observations on the life history of the scorpion Urodacus abruptus (Scorpionidae), and the analysis of its home sites. Aust J Zool 14:383–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stull RB (1988) An introduction to boundary layer meteorology, 1st edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

  • Svendsen GE (1976) Structure and location of burrows of yellow-bellied marmot. Southwest Nat 20:487–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talal S, Tesler I, Sivan J et al (2015) Scorpion speciation in the Holy Land: multilocus phylogeography corroborates diagnostic differences in morphology and burrowing behavior among Scorpio subspecies and justifies recognition as phylogenetic, ecological and biological species. Mol Phylogenet Evol 91:226–237. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2015.04.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tare T, Vad N, Renapurkar D (1993) Burrow patterns of the scorpion Heterometrus indus. Med Vet Entomol 7:102–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tilak R (1970) On an interesting observation on the living habit of Hormurus nigripes Pocock (Ischnuridae: Arachnida). Sci Cult 36:174–176

  • Toolson E, Hadley N (1977) Cuticular permeability and epicuticular lipid composition in two Arizona vejovid scorpions. Physiol Zool 50:323–330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tschinkel WR (2010) Methods for casting subterranean ant nests. J. Insect Sci. 10:88

  • Turner JS (2000) The extended organism; the physiology of animal-built structures. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner JS (2001) On the mound of Macrotermes michaelseni as an organ of respiratory gas exchange. Physiol Biochem Zool 74:798–822. doi:10.1086/323990

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turner JS, Pinshow B (2015) Transient-state mechanisms of wind-induced burrow ventilation. J Exp Biol 218:170–175. doi:10.1242/jeb.110858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, Fourth. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Von Frisch K (1974) Animal architecture. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York

  • White C (2001) The energetics of burrow excavation by the inland robust scorpion, Urodacus yaschenkoi (Birula, 1903). Aust J Zool 49:663–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitford WG, Kay FR (1999) Biopedturbation by mammals in deserts: a review. J Arid Environ 41:203–230. doi:10.1006/jare.1998.0482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams SC (1966) Burrowing activities of the scorpion Anuroctonus phaeodactylus (Wood) (Scorpionida: Vejovidae). Proc Calif Acad Sci 34:419–428

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Stuart Summerfield for the invaluable technical assistance; David Andreen, Golan Bel, and Mike Kirby for their help with calculating burrow tortuosity; Gina and Jacobus Olivier for their incredibly generous hospitality and assistance in the field at Bloukop; Eran Gefen and Yael Lubin for their advice; and three anonymous reviewers for the comments on a previous draft of the manuscript. This research was supported by grant 136/10 from the Israel Science Foundation to BP and Pedro Berliner, Human Frontier Science Program grant RGP0066/2012-TURNER to JST and EM, and by a post-doctoral fellowship from the Jacob Blaustein Center for Scientific Cooperation and a Company of Biologists Travel Grant from the Society of Experimental Biology to AMA. This is paper number 908 of the Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology.

Authors’ contributions

AMA, EM, JST, and BP conceived, designed, and performed the experiments. AMA analyzed the data. LP identified the scorpions. AMA and BP wrote the manuscript and JST and LP edited the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, 84990, Midreshet Ben-Gurion, Israel

    Amanda M. Adams & Berry Pinshow

  2. Department of Entomology, National Museum of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia

    Eugene Marais

  3. Department of Environmental and Forest Biology, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York, Syracuse, New York, NY, 13210, USA

    J. Scott Turner

  4. Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, 10024, USA

    Lorenzo Prendini

  5. Department of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA

    Amanda M. Adams

Authors
  1. Amanda M. Adams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eugene Marais
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Scott Turner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lorenzo Prendini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Berry Pinshow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda M. Adams.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by: Sven Thatje

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

Three-dimensional scans of aluminum casts of burrows of three species of scorpion: Scorpio palmatus in the Negev Desert highlands, Israel (n = 30), Opistophthalmus wahlbergii in the Kalahari Desert, Namibia (n = 19), and Opistophthalmus setifrons in the Central Highlands, Namibia (n = 4). Stereolithography images (.STL) can be viewed using Geomagic Verify Viewer, which is freely available at URL:http://www.geomagic.com/ (ZIP 69.5 mb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adams, A.M., Marais, E., Turner, J.S. et al. Similar burrow architecture of three arid-zone scorpion species implies similar ecological function. Sci Nat 103, 56 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-016-1374-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-016-1374-z

Keywords

  • Burrows
  • Extended organism
  • Three-dimensional modeling
  • Scorpionidae
  • Temperature gradients