The Science of Nature

, 103:28 | Cite as

Review of the fossil matamata turtles: earliest well-dated record and hypotheses on the origin of their present geographical distribution

  • Gabriel S. Ferreira
  • Ascanio D. Rincón
  • Andrés Solórzano
  • Max C. Langer
Original Paper


The matamata (Chelus fimbriatus) is a highly aquatic chelid turtle known exclusively from northern South America. Due to its extremely modified morphology, it is well circumscribed among living taxa, but that is not the case of the two extinct species ascribed to the taxon, Chelus colombianus and Chelus lewisi. These were originally described for the Miocene of Colombia and Venezuela, respectively, and are known mostly from post-cranial material. Few traits have been considered diagnostic for these fossil taxa, and their shared geographic and temporal distributions raise doubts about their distinctiveness. Here, we describe new turtle remains from the early Miocene Castillo Formation, at Cerro la Cruz, northwestern Venezuela, assigning them to C. colombianus. We also review the taxonomy and diagnostic features of the fossil species of Chelus, comparing them with the variation recognized within C. fimbriatus. All alleged differences between the fossil Chelus species were found in our sample of the extant species, and may represent intraspecific variation of a single fossil species. Further, we reviewed the fossil record of Chelus spp. and proposed a paleobiogeographic hypothesis to explain its present geographic range.


Chelus Chelidae Miocene Venezuela Biogeography 



The authors gratefully acknowledge Evangelos Vlachos for the discussions about nomenclature, the editor-in-chief of The Science of Nature Sven Thatje, and the reviewers (W.G. Joyce, M. Rabi, and two anonymous) for their insightful comments on the first version of the manuscript. This research was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) scholarships to GSF (2012/11604-1; 2014/25379-5) and research funding to MCL (2014/03825-3) and by Venezuelan Ministry of University Education, Science, and Technology (MEUCT) research funding IVIC-1096 and PEII2012-456 to ADR and AS.


  1. Aguilera OA (2004) Tesoros paleontológicos de Venezuela: Urumaco, patrimonio natural de la humanidad. Universidad Nacional Experimental Francisco de Miranda. Santa Ana de Coro, VenezuelaGoogle Scholar
  2. Batsch AJGC (1788) Versuch einer Anleitung, zur Kenntniß und Geschichte der Thiere und Mineralien. Akademische Buchhandlung, JenaGoogle Scholar
  3. Bermúdez MA, van der Beek P, Bernet M (2011) Asynchronous Miocene–Pliocene exhumation of the central Venezuelan Andes. Geology 39(2):139–142. doi: 10.1130/G31582.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bocquentin VJ (1988) On the turtle Chelus lewisi (Testudinata, Pleurodira). J Herpetol 22:343–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bocquentin VJ, Rodrigues dos Santos JC (1989) Ocorrência de Chelus colombiana (Chelonii, Chelidae) no Mioceno superior do Estado do Acre, Brasil. In: Anais do XI Congresso Brasileiro de Paleontologia, Curitiba, Sociedade Brasileira de Paleontologia ed., Curitiba, 9/1989, pp 439–446.Google Scholar
  6. Bocquentin J, Guilherme E, Negri FR (2001) Two species of the genus Chelus (Pleurodira, Chelidae) in the late Miocene-Pliocene of Southwestern Amazon. Geociências 6(6):50–55Google Scholar
  7. Cadena EA, Jaramillo CA (2015a) Early to middle Miocene turtles from the northernmost tip of South America: giant testudinids, chelids, and podocnemidids from the Castilletes Formation, Colombia. Ameghiniana 52(2):188–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cadena EA, Jaramillo CA (2015b) The first fossil skull of Chelus (Pleurodira: Chelidae, Matamata turtle) from the early Miocene of Colombia. Palaeontol Electron 18.2(32A):1–10Google Scholar
  9. Cadena EA, Jaramillo C, Paramo M (2008) New material of Chelus colombiana (Testudines; Pleurodira) from the Lower Miocene of Colombia. J Vertebr Paleontol 28:1206–1212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campos DA (1977) Tartarugas fósseis do Brasil. Dissertation, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
  11. Cope ED (1864) On the limits and relations of the Raniformes. Proc Acad Natl Sci Phila 16:181–183Google Scholar
  12. Díaz de Gamero ML, Linares OJ (1989) Estratigrafía y paleontología de la Formación Urumaco, del Mioceno tardío de Falcón noroccidental. In: VII Congreso Geologico de Venezuela (Memorias) 1, p 419–439Google Scholar
  13. de la Fuente MS, Lapparent de Broin F, Manera de Bianco T (2001) The oldest and first nearly complete skeleton of a chelid, of the Hydromedusa sub-group (Chelidae, Pleurodira), from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia. Bull Soc Geol Fr 172:105–112Google Scholar
  14. Díaz de Gamero ML (1996) The changing course of the Orinoco River during the Neogene, a review. Palaeogeogr Palaeocl 123:385–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duméril AMC (1806) Zoologie analytique, ou méthode naturelle de classification des animaux, rendue plus facile a l’aide de tableux synoptiques. Allais, ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gaffney ES (1990) The comparative osteology of the Triassic turtle Proganochelys. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 194:1–263Google Scholar
  17. Garbin RC (2014) Revisão taxonômica da tartaruga de água doce neotropical Chelus fimbriatus (Schneider, 1783) (Testudines; Chelidae), a Matamatá. Dissertation, Museu Nacional, Universidade do Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  18. Gray E (1825) A synopsis of the genera of reptiles and amphibia, with a description of some new species. Ann Philos 10:193–217Google Scholar
  19. Handy AJW, Jones DS, Moreno F, Zapata V, Jaramillo C (2015) Neogene molluscs, shallow-marine paleoenvironments and chronostratigraphy of the Guajira Peninsula, Colombia. Swiss J Paleontol 134:45–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoorn C, Wesselingh FP, ter Steege H, Bermudez MA, Mora A, Sevink J, Sanmartín I, Sánchez–Meseguer A, Anderson CL, Figueiredo JP, Jaramillo C, Riff D, Negri FR, Hooghiemstra H, Lundberg J, Stadler T, Särkinen T, Antonelli A (2010) Amazonia through time: Andean uplift, climate change, landscape evolution, and biodiversity. Science 330:927–931CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Huene FF (1944) Ein Anomodontier-Fund am oberen Amazonas. N Jb Geol Paläont (Monatsh) 10:260–265Google Scholar
  22. ICZN (International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature) (1999) International code of zoological nomenclature, 4th edn. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson K, Sánchez-Villagra M, Aguilera OA (2009) The Oligocene-Miocene transition on coral reefs in the Falcón Basin (NW Venezuela). Palaios 24(1):59–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lapparent de Broin F, Bocquentin J, Negri FR (1993) Gigantic turtles (Pleurodira, Podocnemididae) from the late Miocene-early Pliocene of South Western Amazon. Bull de l’Institut français d’études andines 22(2):657–670Google Scholar
  25. Linares OJ (2004) Bioestratigrafía de la fauna de mamíferos de las formaciones Socorro, Urumaco y Codore (Mioceno Medio–Plioceno Temprano), de la región de Urumaco, Falcón, Venezuela. Paleobiología Neotropical 1:1–26Google Scholar
  26. Martínez G, Valleta G (2008) Petrografia de las facies gruesas de la Formación Matatere y otras unidades del centro-occidente de Venezuela. Geos, Universidad Central de Venezuela 40 (201):65–66Google Scholar
  27. Moreno JF, Hendy AJW, Quiroz L, Hoyos N, Jones DS, Zapata V (2015) Revised stratigraphy of Neogene strata in the Cocinetas Basin, La Guajira, Colombia. Swiss J Palaeontol 134:1–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oliveira GR, Romano PSR (2007) Histórico dos achados de tartarugas fósseis do Brasil. Arq Mus Nac 65(1):113–133Google Scholar
  29. Patterson B (1936) Caiman latirostris from the Pleistocene of Argentine, and a summary of South American Cenozoic Crocodilia. Herpetologica 1:43–54Google Scholar
  30. Paula-Couto C (1960) Uma preguiça terrícola da região do Alto Amazonas, Colômbia. Bol do Mus Nac (Nova Série, Geol) 31:1–9Google Scholar
  31. Price IL (1956) Sobre a suposta presença de um anomodonte triássico no alto rio Amazonas. Notas Preliminares e Estud 93:1–10Google Scholar
  32. Pritchard PCH (2008) Chelus fimbriata (Schneider 1783) matamata turtle. In Conservation biology of freshwater turtles and tortoises: a compilation project of the IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group. In: Rhodin AGJ, Pritchard PCH, van Dijk PP, Saumure RA, Buhlmann KA, Iverson JB (ed) Chelonian Res Monogr 5:1–10Google Scholar
  33. Pritchard PCH, Trebbau P (1984) The turtles of Venezuela. Society for the Study of Amphibians and ReptilesGoogle Scholar
  34. Rincón AD, Solórzano A, Benammi M, Vignaud P, McDonald HG (2014) Chronology and geology of an Early Miocene mammalian assemblage in North of South America, from Cerro La Cruz (Castillo Formation), Lara State, Venezuela: implications in the “changing course of Orinoco River” hypothesis. Andean Geol 41:507–528Google Scholar
  35. Rodrigues JB (1892) Les reptiles fossiles de la vallé de l’Amazone. Vellosia 2:41–56Google Scholar
  36. Rueda-Almonacid JV, Carr JL, Mittermeier RA, Rodriguez-Mahecha JV, Mast RB, Vogt RC, Rhodin AGJ, de la Ossa-Velásquez J, Rueda JN, Mittermeier CG (2007) Las tortugas y los crocodilianos de los países andinos del trópico. Editorial Panamericana, Formas e Impresos, Serie de guías tropicales de campo No. 6, Conservación Internacional. Bogotá, ColombiaGoogle Scholar
  37. Sánchez–Villagra MR, Aguilera OA (2006) Neogene vertebrates from Urumaco, Falcón State, Venezuela: diversity and significance. J Syst Palaeontol 4:213–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sánchez-Villagra MR, Linares OJ, Paolillo A (1995) Consideraciones sobre la sistematica de las tortugas del genero Chelus (Pleurodira: Chelidae) y nuevas evidencias fosiles del Mioceno de Colombia y Venezuela. Ameghiniana 32(2):159–167Google Scholar
  39. Sanchez-Villagra MR, Pritchard PC, Paolillo A, Linares OJ (1995) Geographic variation in the matamata turtle, Chelus fimbriatus, with observations on its shell morphology and morphometry. Chelonian Conserv Biol 1:293–300Google Scholar
  40. Smith CJ, Collins LS, Jaramillo C, Quiroz LI (2010) Marine paleoenvironments of Miocene–Pliocene formations of North-Central Falcón State, Venezuela. J Foraminifer Res 40(3):266–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Solórzano A, Rincón AD (2016) The earliest record (early Miocene) of a bony-toothed bird from South America and a re-examination of Venezuelan Pelagornithids. J Vertebr Paleontol 35(6):e995188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Strauch A (1862) Chelonologische studien, mit besonderer beziehung auf die Schildkrötensammlung der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu St. Petersburg. Mem Acad Impériale des Sci de St-Pétersbourg 5(7):1–196Google Scholar
  43. Wesselingh FP, Macsotay O (2006) Pachydon hettneri (Anderson, 1928) as indicator for Caribbean–Amazonian lowland connections during the Early–Middle Miocene. J S Am Earth Sci 21:49–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wheeler CB (1960) Estratigrafía del Oligoceno y Mioceno inferior de Falcón occidental y nororiental. Memorias. In: III Congreso Geológico Venezolano 1:407–465Google Scholar
  45. Williams E (1952) A new fossil tortoise from Mona Island, West Indies, and a tentative arrangement of the tortoises of the world. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 99(9):541–560Google Scholar
  46. Wood RC (1976) Two new species of Chelus (Testudines: Pleurodira) from the Late Tertiary of northern South America. Breviora 435:1–26Google Scholar
  47. Zug GR (1977) The matamata (Testudines: Chelidae) is Chelus not Chelys! Herpetologica 1977:53–54Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriel S. Ferreira
    • 1
  • Ascanio D. Rincón
    • 2
  • Andrés Solórzano
    • 2
  • Max C. Langer
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratório de Paleontologia de Ribeirão Preto, FFCLRPUniversidade de São PauloRibeirão PretoBrazil
  2. 2.Laboratorio de Paleontología, Centro de EcologíaInstituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científcas (IVIC)CaracasVenezuela

Personalised recommendations