The Science of Nature

, 102:41 | Cite as

Adhesion of dry and wet electrostatic capture silk of uloborid spider

  • Hervé Elettro
  • Sébastien Neukirch
  • Arnaud Antkowiak
  • Fritz VollrathEmail author
Short Communication


We demonstrate the impressive adhesive qualities of uloborid spider orb-web capture when dry, which are lost when the nano-filament threads are wetted. A force sensor with a 50 nN–1 mN detection sensitively allowed us to measure quantitatively the stress–strain characteristics of native silk threads in both the original dry state and after wetting by controlled application of water mist with droplet sizes ranging between 3 and 5 μm and densities ranging between 104 and 105 per mm3. Stress forces of between 1 and 5 μN/μm2 in the native, dry multifilament thread puffs were reduced to between 0.1 and 0.5 μN/μm2 in the wetted collapsed state, with strain displacements reducing from between 2 and 5 mm in the dry to 0.10–0.12 mm in the wetted states. We conclude that wetting cribellate threads reduce their van der Waals adhesion with implications on the thread’s adhesive strength under tension. This should be considered when discussing the evolutionary transitions of capture silks from the ancestral dry-state nano-filaments of the cribellate spider taxa to the wet-state glue-droplets of the ecribellate taxa.


Spider Web Glue Electrostatic Evolution Prey capture 



We all thank the Royal Society of London (International Exchange grant IE130506), the Paris group also thanks the Agence Nationale Reseaux (grant 09-JCJC-0022-01), La Ville de Paris (grant Programme Emergence) and the CNRS (grant PEPS PTI) while FV also thanks the US Air Force (AFOSR grant FA9550-12-1-0294) and the European Research Council (ERC grant SP2-GA-2008-233409). Last but not least, we thank the journal’s reviewers for improving comments. Data accessibility: All data and methods are reported within this paper and with the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material

Supplementary video 1

Mist is sent onto cribellate capture thread, revealing the uloborid puffs in the first instants, before collapsing them into non-sticky spindle-knots. This reduced significantly the adhesion properties of the capture thread, effectively destroying its primary biological function. (MOV 5475 kb)


  1. Bico J, Roman B, Moulin L, Boudaoud A (2004) Elastocapillary coalescence in wet hair. Nature 432:690CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Blackledge TA, Hayashi CY (2006) Unraveling the mechanical properties of composite silk threads spun by cribellate orb-weaving spiders. J Exp Bio 209:3131–3140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bond JA, Opell DB (1998) Testing adaptive radiation and key innovation hypotheses in spiders. Evolution 52:403–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bond JE, Garrison NL, Hamilton CA, Godwin RL, Hedin M, Agnarsson I (2014) Phylogenomics resolves a spider backbone phylogeny and rejects a prevailing paradigm for orb web evolution. Curr Biol 24:1765–1771CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Edmonds D, Vollrath F (1992) The contribution of atmospheric water vapour to the formation and efficiency of a spider’s capture web. Proc Roy Soc London 248:145–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fernández R, Hormiga G, Giribet G (2014) Phylogenomic analysis of spiders reveals nonmonophyly of orb weavers. Curr Biol 24:1772–1777CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Foelix R (2011) Biology of spiders, 3rd edn. Oxford Univ. Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Hawthorn AC, Opell BD (2002) Evolution of adhesive mechanisms, in cribellar spider prey capture thread: Evidence for van der Waals and hygroscopic forces. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 77:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hawthorn AC, Opell BD (2003) Van der Waals and hygroscopic forces of adhesion generated by spider capture threads. J Exp Biol 206:3905–3911CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kronenberger K, Vollrath F (2015) Spiders spinning electrically charged nano-fibres. Biol Let 11(1):20140813. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0813 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Opell BD (1994) Factors governing the stickiness of cribellar prey capture threads in the spider family Uloboridae. J Morphol 221:111–119Google Scholar
  12. Opell DB, Bond JE (2001) Changes in the mechanical properties of capture threads and the evolution of modern orb-weaving spiders. Evol Ecol Res 3:567–581Google Scholar
  13. Opell DB, Hendricks ML (2007) Adhesive recruitment by the viscous capture threads of, araneoid orb-weaving spiders. J Exp Biol 210:553–560CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Opell BD, Schwend HS (2009) Adhesive efficiency of spider prey capture threads. Zoology 112:16–26Google Scholar
  15. Opell BD, Tran AM, Karinshak SE (2011) Adhesive compatibility of cribellar and viscous prey capture threads and its implication for the evolution of orb-weaving, spiders. J Exp Zool 315:376–384Google Scholar
  16. Peters TM (1984) The spinning apparatus of Uloboridae in relation, to the structure and construction of capture threads, (Arachnida, Araneida). Zoomorph 104:96–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Peters HM (1987) Fine Structure and Function of Capture Threads in Ecophysiology of Spiders. pp187-202 in (ed.) W. Nentwig Springer-Verlag Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  18. Peters HM (1995) Ultrastructure of orb spiders’ gluey capture threads. Naturwissenschaften 82:380–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sahni V, Blackledge TA, Dhinojwala A (2011) A review on spider silk adhesion. J Adhes 87:595–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shear W (1986) Spiders, Webs, Behavior and Evolution. Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
  21. Vollrath F (2005) Spiders’ Webs. Curr Biol 15:R364–R365CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Vollrath F, Fairbrother WJ, Williams RJP, Tillinghast EK, Bernstein DT, Gallager KS, Townley MA (1990) Compounds in the droplets of the orb spider’s viscid spiral. Nature 345:526–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vollrath F, Edmonds D (1989) Modulation of the mechanical properties of spider silk by coating with water. Nature 340:305–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vollrath F, Tillinghast E (1991) Glycoprotein glue beneath a spider web’s aqueous coat. Naturwissenschaften 78:557–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zheng Y, Bai H, Huang Z, Tian X, Nie FQ, Zhao Y, Zhai J, Jiang L (2010) Directional water collection on wetted spider silk. Nature 462:640–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hervé Elettro
    • 1
  • Sébastien Neukirch
    • 1
  • Arnaud Antkowiak
    • 1
  • Fritz Vollrath
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Paris 06, CNRS, UMR 7190ParisFrance
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations