Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of task switching costs on colony homeostasis

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
The Science of Nature Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In social insects, division of labour allows colonies to optimise the allocation of workers across all available tasks to satisfy colony requirements. The maintenance of stable conditions within colonies (homeostasis) requires that some individuals move inside the nest to monitor colony needs and execute unattended tasks. We developed a simple theoretical model to explore how worker mobility inside the nest and task switching costs influence the maintenance of stable levels of task-associated stimuli. Our results indicate that worker mobility in large colonies generates important task switching costs and is detrimental to colony homeostasis. Our study suggests that the balance between benefits and costs associated with the mobility of workers patrolling inside the nest depends on colony size. We propose that several species of ants with diverse life-history traits should be appropriate to test the prediction that the proportion of mobile workers should vary during colony ontogeny.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Beshers SN, Fewell JH (2001) Models of division of labor in social insects. Annu Rev Entomol 46:413–440

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonabeau E, Theraulaz G, Deneubourg J-L (1996) Quantitative study of the fixed threshold model for the regulation of division of labour in insect societies. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:1565–1569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerdá X, Retana J (1992) A behavioural study of transporter workers in Cataglyphis iberica ant colonies (Hymenoptera Formicidae). Ethol Ecol Evol 4:359–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charbonneau D, Hillis N, Dornhaus A (2015) ‘Lazy’ in nature: ant colony time budgets show high ‘inactivity’ in the field as well as in the lab. Insect Soc 62:31–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chittka L, Muller H (2009) Learning, specialization, efficiency and task allocation in social insects. Commun Integr Biol 2:151–154

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Depickère S, Fresneau D, Deneubourg J-L (2004) A basis for spatial and social patterns in ant species: dynamics and mechanisms of aggregation. J Insect Behav 17:81–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks NR, Deneubourg J-L (1997) Self-organizing nest construction in ants: individual worker behaviour and the nest’s dynamics. Anim Behav 54:779–796

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franks NR, Wilby A, Silverman BW, Tofts C (1992) Self-organizing nest construction in ants: sophisticated building by blind bulldozing. Anim Behav 44:357–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fresneau D, Corbara B, Lachaud J-P (1989) Organisation sociale et structuration spatiale autour du couvain chez Pachycondyla apicalis (Formicidae, Ponerinae). Actes Coll Insect Soc 5:83–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeanne RL (1986) The evolution of the organization of work in social insects. Monit Zool Ital 20:119–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeanson R (2012) Long-term dynamics in proximity networks in ants. Anim Behav 83:915–923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeanson R, Weidenmüller A (2014) Interindividual variability in social insects—proximate causes and ultimate consequences. Biol Rev 89:671–687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jeanson R, Kukuk PF, Fewell JH (2005) Emergence of division of labour in halictine bees: contributions of social interactions and behavioural variance. Anim Behav 70:1183–1193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeanson R, Fewell JH, Gorelick R, Bertram SM (2007) Emergence of increased division of labor as a function of group size. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:289–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachaud J-P, Fresneau D (1987) Social regulation in ponerine ants. In: Pasteels JM, Deneubourg J-L (eds) From Individual to Collective Behavior in Social Insects. Birkhäuser, Basel, (Experientia Suppl 54) pp 197–217

  • Mersch DP, Crespi A, Keller L (2013) Tracking individuals shows spatial fidelity is a key regulator of ant social organization. Science 340:1090–1093

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mirenda JT, Vinson SB (1981) Division of labour and specification of castes in the red imported fire ant Solenopsis invicta Buren. Anim Behav 29:410–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschinkel WR (1999) Sociometry and sociogenesis of colonies of the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius: distribution of workers, brood and seeds within the nest in relation to colony size and season. Ecol Entomol 24:222–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschinkel WR (2005) The nest architecture of the ant, Camponotus socius. J Insect Sci 5:9

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raphaël Jeanson.

Additional information

Communicated by: Sven Thatje

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Figure S1

(DOCX 862 kb)

Figure S2

(DOCX 9047 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jeanson, R., Lachaud, JP. Influence of task switching costs on colony homeostasis. Sci Nat 102, 36 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-015-1287-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-015-1287-2

Keywords

Navigation