Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sown species richness and realized diversity can influence functioning of plant communities differently

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Naturwissenschaften Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biodiversity–ecosystem functioning experiments (BEF) typically manipulate sown species richness and composition of experimental communities to study ecosystem functioning as a response to changes in diversity. If sown species richness is taken as a measure of diversity and aboveground biomass production as a measure of community functioning, then this relationship is usually found to be positive. The sown species richness can be considered the equivalent of a local species pool in natural communities. However, in addition to species richness, realized diversity is also an important community diversity component. Realized diversity is affected by environmental filtering and biotic interactions operating within a community. As both sown species richness and the realized diversity in BEF studies (as well as local species pool vs observed realized richness in natural communities) can differ markedly, so can their effects on the community functioning. We tested this assumption using two data sets: data from a short-term pot experiment and data from the long-term Jena biodiversity plot experiment. We considered three possible predictors of community functioning (aboveground biomass production): sown species richness, realized diversity (defined as inverse of Simpson dominance index), and survivor species richness. Sown species richness affected biomass production positively in all cases. Realized diversity as well as survivor species richness had positive effects on biomass in approximately half of cases. When realized diversity or survivor species richness was tested together with sown species richness, their partial effects were none or negative. Our results suggest that we can expect positive diversity–productivity relationship when the local species pool size is the decisive factor determining realized observed diversity; in other cases, the shape of the diversity–functioning relationship may be quite opposite.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balvanera P, Pfisterer AB, Buchmann N, He JS, Nakashizuka T, Raffaelli D, Schmid B (2006) Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecol Lett 9:1146–1156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butaye J, Jacquemyn H, Honnay O, Hermy M (2001) The species pool concept applied to forests in a fragmented landscape: dispersal limitation versus habitat limitation. J Veg Sci 13:27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinale BJ, Matulich KL, Hooper DU, Byrnes JE, Duffy E, Gamfeldt L, Balvanera P, O’Connor MI, Gonzales A (2011) The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems. Am J Bot 98:572–592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chalcraft DR, Williams JW, Smith MD, Willig MR (2004) Scale dependence in the species richness-productivity relationship: the role of species turnover. Ecology 85:2701–2708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS, Zavaleta ES, Eviner VT et al (2000) Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405:234–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz S, Cabido M (2001) Vive la difference: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol Evol 16:646–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornara DA, Tilman D (2009) Ecological mechanisms associated with the positive diversity-productivity relationship in an N-limited grassland. Ecology 90:408–418

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garnier E, Cortez J, Billes G, Navas M et al (2004) Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession. Ecology 85:2630–2637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Götzenberger L, de Bello F, Bråthen KA et al (2012) Ecological assembly rules in plant communities—approaches, patterns and prospects. Biol Rev Camb Philos 87:111–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper DU, Adair EC, Cardinale BJ et al (2012) A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Nature 486:105–109

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jain M, Flynn DFB, Prager CM, Hart GM, DeVan CM, Ahrestani FS et al (2014) The importance of rare species: a trait-based assessment of rare species contributions to functional diversity and possible ecosystem function in tall-grass prairies. Ecol Evol 4:104–112

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kenkel NC, Peltzer DA, Baluta D, Pirie D (2000) Increasing plant diversity does not influence productivity: empirical evidence and potential mechanisms. Commun Ecol 1:165–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostenko O, van de Voorde TFJ, Mulder PPJ, van der Putten WH, Bezemer TM (2012) Legacy effects of aboveground–belowground interactions. Ecol Lett 15:813–821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Kroon H, Hendriks M, van Ruijven J, Ravenek J, Padilla FM, Jongejans E et al (2012) Root responses to nutrients and soil biota: drivers of species coexistence and ecosystem productivity. J Ecol 100:6–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepš J (2013) Diversity and ecosystem function. In: van der Maarel E, Franklin J (eds) Vegetation ecology, 2nd edn. John Wiley, Oxford, pp 308–346

  • Lepš J, Spitzer K, Jaroš J (1998) Food plants, species composition and variability of the moth community in undisturbed forest. Oikos 81:538–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepš J, Doležal J, Bezemer TM et al (2007) Long-term effectiveness of sowing high and low diversity seed mixtures to enhance plant community development on ex-arable fields in five European countries. Appl Veg Sci 10:97–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M, Hector A (2001) Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 412:72–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marquard E, Weigelt A, Temperton VM et al (2009) Plant species richness and functional composition drive over yielding in a six-year grassland experiment. Ecology 90:3290–3302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marquard E, Schmid B, Roscher C et al (2013) Changes in the abundance of grassland species in monocultures versus mixtures and their relation to biodiversity effects. PLoS One 8(9):e75599

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelbach GG, Steiner CF, Scheiner SM et al (2001) What is the observed relationship between species richness and productivity? Ecology 82:2381–2396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers JA, Harms KE (2009) Seed arrival, ecological filters, and plant species richness: a meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 12:1250–1260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Naeem S, Duffy JE, Zavaleta E (2012) The functions of biological diversity in an age of extinctions. Science 336:1401–1406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nijs I, Roy J (2000) How important are species richness, species evenness and interspecific differences to productivity? Oikos 88:57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petermann J, Fergus A, Roscher C et al (2010) Biology, chance or history? The predictable re-assembly of temperate grassland communities. Ecology 91:408–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfisterer AB, Joshi J, Schmid B et al (2004) Rapid decay of diversity-productivity relationships after invasion of experimental plant communities. Basic Appl Ecol 5:5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich PB, Tilman D, Isbell F, Mueller K, Hobbie SE, Flynn DFB, Eisenhauer N (2012) Impacts of biodiversity loss escalate through time as redundancy fades. Science 336:589–592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reitalu T, Prentice HC, Sykes MT et al (2008) Plant species segregation on different spatial scales in semi-natural grasslands. J Veg Sci 19:407–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson PJ, MacDougall AS, Larson DW (2012) Fine-scale spatial heterogeneity and incoming seed diversity additively determine plant establishment. J Ecol 100:939–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rixen C, Huovinen C, Huovinen K et al (2008) A plant diversity×water chemistry experiment in subalpine grassland. Perspect Plant Ecol 10:51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roscher C, Temperton VM, Buchmann N, Schulze ED (2009) Community assembly and biomass production in regularly and never weeded experimental grasslands. Acta Oecol 35:206–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson MA (2010) Stability of production and plant species diversity in managed grasslands: a retrospective study. Basic Appl Ecol 11:216–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki T, Lauernroth WK (2011) Dominant species, rather than diversity, regulates temporal stability of plant communities. Oecologia 166:761–768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid B (2002) The species richness-productivity controversy. Trends Ecol Evol 17:113–114

  • Schmitz M, Flynn DFB, Mwangi PN et al (2013) Consistent effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning under varying density and evenness. Folia Geobot 4:335–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Špaekova I, Lepš J (2001) Procedure for separating the selection effect from other effects in diversity-productivity relationship. Ecol Lett 4:585–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stachová T, Lepš J (2010) Species pool size and realized species richness affect productivity differently: a modelling study. Acta Oecol 36:578–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson K, Askew AP, Grime JP et al (2005) Biodiversity, ecosystem function and plant traits in mature and immature plant communities. Funct Ecol 19:355–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wacker L, Baudois O, Eichenberger-Glinz S, Schmid B (2008) Environmental heterogeneity increases complementarity in experimental grassland communities. Basic Appl Ecol 9:467–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weigelt A, Marquard E, Temperton VM et al (2010) The Jena experiment: six years of data from a grassland biodiversity experiment. Ecology 91:929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss JJ, Cardinale BJ, Forshay KJ, Ives AR (2007) Effects of species diversity on community biomass production change over the course of succession. Ecology 88:929–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JB (2011) The twelve theories of co-existence in plant communities: the doubtful, the important and the unexplored. J Veg Sci 22:184–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Paul J. Richardson and two anonymous referees for constructive comments on our manuscript. We also thank Sirja Seppa and Genevieve Finerty for the language revision. The research was supported by GAČR-13-17118S.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terezie Rychtecká.

Additional information

Communicated by: Sven Thatje

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 120 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rychtecká, T., Lanta, V., Weiterová, I. et al. Sown species richness and realized diversity can influence functioning of plant communities differently. Naturwissenschaften 101, 637–644 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-014-1198-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-014-1198-7

Keywords

Navigation