Naturwissenschaften

, Volume 100, Issue 3, pp 249–256 | Cite as

The influence of pigmentation patterning on bumblebee foraging from flowers of Antirrhinum majus

  • Heather M. Whitney
  • Georgina Milne
  • Sean A. Rands
  • Silvia Vignolini
  • Cathie Martin
  • Beverley J. Glover
Original Paper

Abstract

Patterns of pigmentation overlying the petal vasculature are common in flowering plants and have been postulated to play a role in pollinator attraction. Previous studies report that such venation patterning is significantly more attractive to bee foragers in the field than ivory or white flowers without veins. To dissect the ways in which venation patterning of pigment can influence bumblebee behaviour, we investigated the response of flower-naïve individuals of Bombus terrestris to veined, ivory and red near-isogenic lines of Antirrhinum majus. We find that red venation shifts flower colour slightly, although the ivory background is the dominant colour. Bees were readily able to discriminate between ivory and veined flowers under differential conditioning but showed no innate preference when presented with a free choice of rewarding ivory and veined flowers. In contrast, both ivory and veined flowers were selected significantly more often than were red flowers. We conclude that advantages conferred by venation patterning might stem from bees learning of their use as nectar guides, rather than from any innate preference for striped flowers.

Keywords

Anthocyanin Antirrhinum majus Bombus terrestris Pigmentation Venation 

References

  1. Chittka L (1992) The color hexagon: a chromaticity diagram based on photoreceptor excitations as a generalized representation of colour opponency. J Comp Physiol A 170:533–543Google Scholar
  2. Chittka L, Raine NE (2006) Recognition of flowers by pollinators. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9:428–435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dafni A, Giurfa M (1999) The functional ecology of floral guides in relation to insects behaviour and vision. In: Giurfa M, Wasser SP (eds) Evolutionary theory and processes: modern perspectives. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Leiden, pp 363–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dyer AG, Chittka L (2004) Fine colour discrimination requires differential conditioning in bumblebees. Naturwissenschaften 91:224–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dyer AG, Whitney HM, Arnold SEJ, Glover BJ, Chittka L (2007) Mutations perturbing petal cell shape and anthocyanin synthesis influence bumblebee perception of Antirrhinum majus flower colour. Arthropod-Plant Interact 1:45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eckhart VM, Rushing NS, Hart GM, Hansen JD (2006) Frequency-dependent pollinator foraging in polymorphic Clarkia xantiana ssp. xantiana populations: implications for flower colour evolution and pollinator interactions. Oikos 112:412–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eiskowitch D (1980) The role of dark flowers in the pollination of certain Umbelliferae. J Nat Hist 14:737–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ellis AG, Johnson SD (2010) Floral mimicry enhances pollen export: the evolution of pollination by sexual deceit outside of Orchidaceae. Am Nat 176:E143–E151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goodrich J, Carpenter R, Coen ES (1992) A common gene regulates pigmentation pattern in diverse plant species. Cell 68:955–964PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gottleib LD, Ford VS (1988) Genetic-studies of the pattern of floral pigmentation in Clarkia gracilis. Heredity 60:237–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hempel de Ibarra N, Giurfa M, Vorobyev M (2001) Detection of coloured patterns by honeybees through chromatic and achromatic cues. J Comp Physiol A 187:215–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heuschen B, Gumbert A, Lunau K (2005) A generalised mimicry system involving angiosperm flower colour, pollen and bumblebees’ innate colour preference. Plant Syst Evol 252:121–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnson SD, Midgley JJ (1997) Fly pollination of Gorteria diffusa (Asteraceae), and a possible mimetic function for dark spots on the capitulum. Am J Bot 84:429–436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Leonard AS, Papaj DR (2011) ‘X’ marks the spot: the possible benefits of nectar guides to bees and plants. Funct Ecol 25:1293–1301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lunau K (2006) Stamens and mimic stamens as components of floral colour patterns. Bot Jahrb Syst 127:13–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lunau K, Unseld K, Wolter F (2009) Visual detection of diminutive floral guides in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris and in the honeybee Apis mellifera. J Comp Physiol A 195:1121–1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moeller DA (2005) Pollinator community structure and sources of spatial variation in plant–pollinator interactions in Clarkia xantiana ssp. xantiana. Oecologia 142:28–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mudalige RM, Kuehnle AR, Amore TD (2003) Pigment distribution and epidermal cell shape in Dendrobium species and hybrids. HortSci 38:573–577Google Scholar
  19. Polte S, Reinhold K (2012) The function of the wild carrot’s dark central floret: attract, guide or deter? Plant Species Biol. doi:10.1111/j.1442-1984.2012.00368.x
  20. Schwinn K, Venail J, Shang YJ, Mackay S, Alm V, Butelli E, Oyama R, Bailey P, Davies K, Martin C (2006) A small family of MYB-regulatory genes controls floral pigmentation intensity and patterning in the genus Antirrhinum. Plant Cell 18:831–851PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shang Y, Venail J, Mackay S, Bailey P, Schwinn K, Jameson P, Martin C, Davies K (2011) The molecular basis for venation patterning of pigmentation and its effect on pollinator attraction in flowers of Antirrhinum. New Phytol 189:602–615PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Spaethe J, Tautz J, Chittka L (2001) Visual constraints in foraging bumble bees: flower size and colour affect search time and flight behavior. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 98:3898–3903PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sutton DA (1988) A revision of the tribe Antirrhineae. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Waser NM, Price MV (1983) Pollinator behaviour and natural selection for flower colour in Delphinium nelsonii. Nature 302:422–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Waser NM, Price MV (1985) The effect of nectar guides on pollinator preference: experimental studies with a montane herb. Oecologia 67:121–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wilson Y, Hudson A (2011) The evolutionary history of Antirrhinum suggests that ancestral phenotype combinations survived repeated hybridisation. Plant J 66:1032–1043PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heather M. Whitney
    • 1
    • 2
  • Georgina Milne
    • 1
  • Sean A. Rands
    • 2
  • Silvia Vignolini
    • 3
  • Cathie Martin
    • 4
  • Beverley J. Glover
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant SciencesUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  2. 2.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  3. 3.Cavendish LaboratoryUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  4. 4.John Innes Centre, Norwich Research ParkNorwichUK

Personalised recommendations