Skip to main content

Tympanal mechanics and neural responses in the ears of a noctuid moth

Abstract

Ears evolved in many groups of moths to detect the echolocation calls of predatory bats. Although the neurophysiology of bat detection has been intensively studied in moths for decades, the relationship between sound-induced movement of the noctuid tympanic membrane and action potentials in the auditory sensory cells (A1 and A2) has received little attention. Using laser Doppler vibrometry, we measured the velocity and displacement of the tympanum in response to pure tone pulses for moths that were intact or prepared for neural recording. When recording from the auditory nerve, the displacement of the tympanum at the neural threshold remained constant across frequencies, whereas velocity varied with frequency. This suggests that the key biophysical parameter for triggering action potentials in the sensory cells of noctuid moths is tympanum displacement, not velocity. The validity of studies on the neurophysiology of moth hearing rests on the assumption that the dissection and recording procedures do not affect the biomechanics of the ear. There were no consistent differences in tympanal velocity or displacement when moths were intact or prepared for neural recordings for sound levels close to neural threshold, indicating that this and other neurophysiological studies provide good estimates of what intact moths hear at threshold.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Adams WB (1972) Mechanical tuning of the acoustic receptor of Prodenia eridania (Cramer) (Noctuidae). J Exp Biol 57(2):297–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenton MB (1990) The foraging behaviour and ecology of animal-eating bats. Can J Zool 68(3):411–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullard JH (1998) The sensory coevolution of moths and bats. In: Hoy RR, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Comparative Hearing: Insects. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 279–326

  • Miller LA, Surlykke A (2001) How some insects detect and avoid being eaten by bats: tactics and countertactics of prey and predator. BioScience 51(7):570–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roeder KD (1966) Interneurons of the thoracic nerve cord activated by tympanic nerve fibres in noctuid moths. J Insect Physiol 12(10):1227–1244

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roeder KD, Treat AE (1957) Ultrasonic reception by the tympanic organ of noctuid moths. J Exp Zool 134(1):127–157

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tougaard J (1998) Detection of short pure-tone stimuli in the noctuid ear: what are temporal integration and integration time all about? J Comp Physiol A 183(5):563–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters DA (2003) Bats and moths: what is there left to learn? Physiol Entomol 28(4):237–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters DA, Jones G (1996) The peripheral auditory characteristics of noctuid moths: responses to the search-phase echolocation calls of bats. J Exp Biol 199(4):847–856

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Windmill JFC, Fullard JH, Robert D (2007) Mechanics of a 'simple' ear: tympanal vibrations in noctuid moths. J Exp Biol 210(15):2637–2648

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yack JE (2004) The structure and function of auditory chordotonal organs in insects. Microsc Res Tech 63(6):315–337

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/f002386/1, MWH), a HFSP Cross Disciplinary Fellowship (LT00024/2008-C, FM-Z) and the Royal Society of London (DR). We thank J. Memmott and G. Jones for collecting moths, A. Radford and I. Cuthill for statistical advice, and B. Hedwig, F. Dupuy, and two anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc W. Holderied.

Additional information

Hannah M. ter Hofstede and Holger R. Goerlitz contributed equally.

Communicated by: Sven Thatje

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

ter Hofstede, H.M., Goerlitz, H.R., Montealegre-Z, F. et al. Tympanal mechanics and neural responses in the ears of a noctuid moth. Naturwissenschaften 98, 1057–1061 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-011-0851-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-011-0851-7

Keywords

  • Moth auditory biomechanics
  • Neurophysiology
  • Auditory threshold
  • Lepidoptera