Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Food preferences and mound-building behaviour of the mound-building mice Mus spicilegus

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Naturwissenschaften Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Optimal foraging strategies and food choice are influenced by various factors, e.g. availability, size and caloric content of the food type and predation risk. However, food choice criteria may change when food is not eaten immediately but has to be carried to a storage site for later use. For example, handling time in terms of harvesting and transport time should be optimized, particularly when the risk of predation is high. Thus, it is not clear whether food selected by hoarding animals reflects their food preference due to intrinsic features of the food type, e.g. size, caloric or lipid content, or whether the food type selected is a compromise that also considers the handling time required for harvesting and transport. We investigate this question in relation to food hoarding behaviour in mound-building mice. In autumn, mound-building mice Mus spicilegus collect seeds and other plant material and cover it with soil. Such above-ground storage is quite unusual for rodents. Here, we investigated whether there is a relationship between the seed species preferred as building materials and those preferred for food. We conducted a seed preference test using three most collected weed species for mound building. Controlling factors like food availability or predation risk, mice prefer Setaria spp. as food, although Amaranthus spp. and Chenopodium spp. were preferentially harvested and stored. By including the availability of the three species, our experimental results were confirmed, namely, a clear preference for Setaria spp. Also, handling time and seed size revealed to influence plant choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Best TL, Intress C, Shull KD (1988) Mound structure in three taxa of Mexican kangaroo rats (Dipodomys spectabilis cratodon, D. s. zygomaticus and D. nelsoni). Am Midl Nat 119:216–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bihari Z (2004) A güzüegér (Mus spicilegus) életmódjának sajátságai és mezögazdasági jelentösége. Növényvédelem 40:245–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford MG, Dennis AJ, Westcott DA (2008) Diet and dietary preferences of the southern cassowary (Casuarius casuarius) in North Queensland, Australia. Biotropica 40:338–343. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00372.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun-Blanquet J (1964) Pflanzensoziologie, Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde. Springer, Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer SW (2001) Predation and dispersal of large and small seeds of a tropical palm. Oikos 92:245–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronson FH (1979) The reproduction ecology of the house mouse. Quart Rev Biol 54:265–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsen M (1993) Migration of Mus musculus musculus in Danish farmland. Z Säugetierk 58:172–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang G, Xiao Z, Zhang Z (2010) Effects of burrow condition and seed handling time on hoarding strategies of Edward's long-tailed rat (Leopoldamys edwardsi). Behav Process 85:163–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande HW, Poshadri A (2011) Physical and sensory characteristics of extruded snacks prepared from foxtail millet based composite flours. Inter Food R J 18:730–735

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmerling-Skala A (2005) Sultan der Gemüsegärten? - der Weiße Gänsefuß (Chenopodium album L.) als Nahrungspflanze, VEN Verein zur Erhaltung der Nutzpflanzenvielfalt e. V., Cremlingen

  • Festetics A (1961) Ährenmaushügel in Österreich. Z Säugetierk 26:112–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Garza JC, Dallas J, Duryadi D, Gerasimov S, Croset H, Boursot P (1997) Social structure of the mound building mouse Mus spicilegus revealed by genetic analysis with microsatellites. Mol Ecol 6:1009–1017. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.1997.00278.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gouat P, Féron C, Demouron S (2003a) Seasonal reproduction and delayed sexual maturity in mound-building mice Mus spicilegus. Reprod Fertil Dev 15:187–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gouat P, Katona K, Poteaux C (2003b) Is the socio-spatial distribution of mound-building mice, Mus spicilegus, compatible with a monogamous mating system? Mammalia 67:15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grulich I (1981) Die Baue des Hamsters (Cricetus cricetus, Rodentia, Mammalia). Folia Zool 30:99–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrold RL, Craig DL, Nalewaja JD, North BB (1980) Nutritional value of green or yellow foxtail, wild oats, wild buckwheat or redroot pigweed seeds as determined with the rat. J Anim Sci 51:127–131

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hölzl M, Hoi H, Darolová A, Krištofík J, Penn DJ (2009) Why do the mounds of Mus spicilegus vary so much in size and composition? Mamm Biol 74:308–314. doi:10.1016/j.mambio.2009.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölzl M, Hoi H, Darolová A, Krištofík J (2011) Insulation capacity of litter mounds built by Mus spicilegus: physical and thermal characteristics of building material and the role of mound size. Ethol Ecol Evol 231:49–59. doi:10.1080/03949370.2010.529827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson TP (2001) Factors influencing food collection behaviour of Brants' whistling rat (Parotomys brantsii): a central place forager. J Zool 255:15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs LF (1992) The effect of handling time on the decision to cache by gray squirrels. Anim Behav 43:522–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jancurová M, Minarovičová L, Dandár A (2009) Quinoa—a review. Czech J Food Scien 27:71–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerley GIH, Erasmus T (1991) What do mice select for in seeds? Oecologia 86:261–267. doi:10.1007/BF00317539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR (1978) Optimal foraging: decision rules for predators. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 23–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessells CM, Boag PT (1987) Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake. Auk 104:116–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobo N, Duong M, Millar JS (2009) Conifer-seed preferences of small mammals. Can J Zool 87:773–780. doi:10.1139/Z09-070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCleery RH (1978) Optimal behaviour sequences and decision making. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 377–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz A, Bonal R (2008a) Are you strong enough to carry that seed? Seed size/body size ratios influence seed choices by rodents. Anim Behav 76:709–715. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.03.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz A, Bonal R (2008b) Seed choice by rodents: learning or inheritance? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:913–922. doi:10.1007/s00265-007-0515-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muriaru D (1981) La presence de Mus musculus spicilegus Petenyi, 1882 dans le delta du Danube accompagne de son "parasite" Apodemus agrarius (Pall., 1771). Trav Mus Hist Nat "Grigore Antipa" 23:297–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Passilly-Degrace P, Gaillard D, Besnard P (2008) Perception gustative des lipides alimentaires. Cahiers Nutr Diet 43:273–281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poteaux C, Busquet N, Gouat P, Katona K, Baudoin C (2008) Socio-genetic structure of mound-building mice, Mus spicilegus, in autumn and early spring. Biol J Linn Soc 93:689–699. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00944.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichman OJ, Wicklow DT, Rebar C (1985) Ecological and morphological characteristics of caches in the mounds of Dipodomys spectabilis. J Mammal 66:643–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sena LP, Vanderjagt DJ, Rivera C, Tsin ATC, Muhamadu I, Mahamadou O, Milleson M, Pastuszyn A, Glew RH (1998) Analysis of nutritional components of eight famine foods of the Republic of Niger. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 52:17–30. doi:10.1023/A:1008010009170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simeonovska-Nikolova DM (2007) Spatial organisation of the mound-building mouse Mus spicilegus in the region of northern Bulgaria. Acta Zool Sinica 53:22–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov VE, Kotenkova EV, Michailenko AG (1998) Mus spicilegus. Mammal Spec 592:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sridhar R, Lakshminarayana G (1994) Contents of total lipids and lipid classes and composition of fatty acids in small millets: foxtail (Setaria italica), proso (Panicum miliaceum), and finger (Eleusine coracana). Cereal Chem 71:355–359

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stein GHW (1958) Die Feldmaus (Microtus arvalis Pallas). Die Neue Brehm-Bücherei, A. Ziemsen-Verlag, Wittenberg-Lutherstadt

  • Suárez OV, Kravetz FO (1998) Transmission of food selectivity from mothers to offspring in Akodon azarae (Rodentia, Muridae). Behaviour 135:251–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Unterholzner K, Willenig R, Bauer K (2000) Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Ährenmaus Mus spicilegus Petenyi, 1882. Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Vander Wall SB (1990) Food hoarding in animals. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michaela Hölzl.

Additional information

Communicated by: Sven Thatje

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hölzl, M., Krištofík, J., Darolová, A. et al. Food preferences and mound-building behaviour of the mound-building mice Mus spicilegus . Naturwissenschaften 98, 863 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-011-0837-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-011-0837-5

Keywords

Navigation