Naturwissenschaften

, Volume 98, Issue 8, pp 693–698 | Cite as

Prospective thinking in a mustelid? Eira barbara (Carnivora) cache unripe fruits to consume them once ripened

Original Paper

Abstract

The ability of nonhuman animals to project individual actions into the future is a hotly debated topic. We describe the caching behaviour of tayras (Eira barbara) based on direct observations in the field, pictures from camera traps and radio telemetry, providing evidence that these mustelids pick and cache unripe fruit for future consumption. This is the first reported case of harvesting of unripe fruits by a nonhuman animal. Ripe fruits are readily taken by a variety of animals, and tayras might benefit by securing a food source before strong competition takes place. Unripe climacteric fruits need to be harvested when mature to ensure that they continue their ripening process, and tayras accurately choose mature stages of these fruits for caching. Tayras cache both native (sapote) and non-native (plantain) fruits that differ in morphology and developmental timeframes, showing sophisticated cognitive ability that might involve highly developed learning abilities and/or prospective thinking.

Keywords

Goal-directed behaviour Caching Future thinking Tayras 

Supplementary material

114_2011_821_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (11.3 mb)
ESM 1(PDF 11550 kb)

References

  1. Arenas-Ocampo ML, Evangelista-Lozano S, Arana-Errasquin R, Jiménez-Aparicio A, Dávila-Ortíz G (2003) Softening and biochemical changes of sapote mamey fruit (Pouteria sapota) at different development and ripening stages. J Food Biochem 27:91–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong SJ, Botzler RG (2003) The animal ethics reader. Routledge, Taylor and Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Bezerra BM, Barnett AA, Souto A, Jones G (2009) Predation by the tayra on the common marmoset and the pale-throated three-toed sloth. J Ethol 27:91–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bisbal FJ (1986) Food habits of some neotropical carnivores in Venezuela (Mammalia, Carnivora). Mammalia 50:329–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clayton NS, Dickinson A (1998) Episodic-like memory during cache recovery by scrub jays. Nature 395:272–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Correia SPC, Dickinson A, Clayton NS (2007) Western scrub-jays anticipate future needs independently of their current motivational state. Curr Biol 17:856–861PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dally JM, Emery NJ, Clayton NS (2006) Food-caching western scrub-jays keep track of who was watching when. Science 312:1662–1665PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dearing MD (1997) The manipulation of plant toxins by a food-hoarding herbivore, Ochotona princeps. Ecology 78:774–781Google Scholar
  9. Dennet DC (1997) Kinds of minds: towards an understanding of consciousness. Basic, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  10. Descartes R (1998) Meditations on first philosophy. In: Cress DA (ed) Discourse on method and meditations on first philosophy, 4th edn. Hackett, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  11. Dukas R (1998) Cognitive ecology: the evolutionary ecology of information processing and decision making. The University of Chicago Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  12. Emery NJ, Clayton NS (2001) Effects of experience and social context on prospective caching strategies in scrub jays. Nature 414:443–446PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guiracocha G, Harvey C, Somarriba E, Krauss U, Carillo E (2001) Conservación de la biodiversidad en sistemas agroforestales con cacao y banano en Talamanca, Costa Rica. Agroforestería en las Américas 8:7–11Google Scholar
  14. Heyes CM (1993) Anecdotes, training, trapping and triangulating: do animals attribute mental states? Anim Behav 46:177–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Janzen D (1983) Eira barbara (Tolomuco, Tayra). In: Janzen DH (ed) Costa Rican natural history. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  16. Leaver LA, Hopewell L, Caldwell C, Mallarky L (2007) Audience effects on food caching in grey squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis): evidence for pilferage avoidance strategies. Anim Cogn 10:23–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McDade LA, Bawa KS, Hespenheide HA, Hartshorn GS (1994) La Selva: ecology and natural history of a neotropical rain forest. University of Chicago Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  18. Mulcahy NJ, Call J (2006) Apes save tools for future use. Science 312:1038–1040PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Offem JO, Njoku PC (1993) Mineral distribution in the fruits of the plantain plant (Musa paradisiaca) in relation to mode and degree of maturation. Food Chem 48:63–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Osvath M (2009) Spontaneous planning for future stone throwing by a male chimpanzee. Curr Biol 19:R190–R191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Osvath M, Osvath H (2008) Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and orangutan (Pongo abelii) forethought: self-control and pre-experience in the face of future tool use. Anim Cogn 11:661–674PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Presley SJ (2000) Eira barbara. Mamm Spec 636:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Raby CR, Clayton NS (2009) Prospective cognition in animals. Behav Process 80:314–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Raby CR, Alexis DM, Dickinson A, Clayton NS (2007) Planning for the future by western scrub-jays. Nature 445:919–921PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reid FA (1997) A field guide to the mammals of Central America and southeast Mexico. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Shettleworth SJ (2001) Animal cognition and animal behaviour. Anim Behav 61:277–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smith CC, Reichman OJ (1984) The evolution of food caching by birds and mammals. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 15:329–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stevens CE, Hume ID (1998) Contributions of microbes in vertebrate gastrointestinal tract to production and conservation of nutrients. Physiol Rev 78:393–427PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Suddendorf T (2006) Foresight and evolution of the human mind. Science 312:1006–1007PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Suddendorf T, Corballis MC (2008) New evidence for animal foresight? Anim Behav 75:e1–e3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Verhoog H, Visser T (1997) A view of intrinsic value not based on animal consciousness. In: Dol M, Kasanmoentalib S, Lijmbach S, Rivas E, van den Bos R (eds) Animal consciousness and animal ethics, perspectives from the Netherlands. Van Gorcum, The Netherlands, pp 223–232Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Escuela de BiologíaUniversidad de Costa Rica, Ciudad UniversitariaSan PedroCosta Rica
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  3. 3.La Selva Biological Station, Organization for Tropical StudiesPuerto Viejo de SarapiquíCosta Rica

Personalised recommendations