Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of paternal phenotype and environmental variability on age and size at maturity in a male dimorphic mite

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Naturwissenschaften Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Investigating how the environment affects age and size at maturity of individuals is crucial to understanding how changes in the environment affect population dynamics through the biology of a species. Paternal phenotype, maternal, and offspring environment may crucially influence these traits, but to my knowledge, their combined effects have not yet been tested. Here, I found that in bulb mites (Rhizoglyphus robini), maternal nutrition, offspring nutrition, and paternal phenotype (males are fighters, able to kill other mites, or benign scramblers) interactively affected offspring age and size at maturity. The largest effect occurred when both maternal and offspring nutrition was poor: in that case offspring from fighter sires required a significantly longer development time than offspring from scrambler sires. Investigating parental effects on the relationship between age and size at maturity revealed no paternal effects, and only for females was its shape influenced by maternal nutrition. Overall, this reaction norm was nonlinear. These non-genetic intergenerational effects may play a complex, yet unexplored role in influencing population fluctuations—possibly explaining why results from field studies often do not match theoretical predictions on maternal effects on population dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anway MD, Cupp AS, Uzumcu M, Skinner MK (2005) Epigenetic transgenerational actions of endocrine disruptors and male fertility. Science 308:1466–1469

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Banks PB, Powell F (2004) Does maternal condition or predation risk influence small mammal population dynamics? Oikos 106:176–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bashey F (2006) Cross-generational environmental effects and the evolution of offspring size in the Trinidadian guppy Poecilia reticulata. Ecology 60:348–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckerman A, Benton TG, Ranta E, Kaitala V, Lundberg P (2002) Population dynamic consequences of delayed life-history effects. Trends Ecol Evol 17:263–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedhomme S, Agnew P, Sidobre C, Michalakis Y (2003) Sex-specific reaction norms to intraspecific larval competition in the mosquito, Aedes aegypti. J Evol Biol 16:721–730

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benton TG, Plaistow SJ, Beckerman AP, Lapsley CT, Littlejohns S (2005) Changes in maternal investment in eggs can affect population dynamics. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 272:1351–1356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benton TG, St Clair JJH, Plaistow SJ (2008) Maternal effects mediated by maternal age: from life histories to population dynamics. J Anim Ecol 77:1038–1046

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonduriansky R, Head M (2007) Maternal and paternal condition effects on offspring phenotype in Telostylinus angusticollis (Diptera: Neriidae). J Evol Biol 20:2379–2388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burley N (1986) Sexual selection for aesthetic traits in species with biparental care. Am Nat 127:415–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chippindale AK, Leroi AM, Saing H, Borash DJ, Rose MR (1997) Phenotypic plasticity and selection in Drosophila life history evolution. 2. Diet, mates and the cost of reproduction. J Evol Biol 10:269–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulson T, Benton TG, Lundberg P, Dall SRX, Kendall BE (2006) Putting evolutionary biology back in the ecological theatre: demographic framework mapping genes to communities. Evol Ecol Res 8:1155–1171

    Google Scholar 

  • Crill WD, Huey RB, Gilchrist GW (1996) Within- and between-generation effects of temperature on the morphology and physiology of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 50:1205–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham EJ, Russell AF (2000) Egg investment is influenced by male attractiveness in the mallard. Nature 404:74–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Day T, Rowe L (2002) Developmental thresholds and the evolution of reaction norms for age and size at life-history transitions. Am Nat 159:338–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donelson JM, Mudnay PL, McCormick MI (2009) Parental effects on offspring life histories: when are they important? Biol Lett 5:262–265

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ergon TX, Lambin X, Stenseth NC (2001) Life-history traits of voles in a fluctuating population respond to the immediate environment. Nature 411:1043–1045

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Pearson Education Ltd., Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox CW, Czesak ME (2000) Evolutionary ecology of progeny size in arthropods. Ann Rev Entomol 45:341–369

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • García-González F, Simmons LW (2005) The evolution of polyandry: intrinsic sire effects contribute to embryo viability. J Evol Biol 18:1097–1103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerson U, Capua S, Thorens D (1983) Life history and life tables of Rhizoglyphus robini Claparède (Acari: Astigmata: Acaridae). Acarologia 24: 439–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerson U, Cohen E, Capua S (1991) Bulb mite, Rhizglyphus robini (Astigmata: Acaridae) as an experimental animal. Exp App Acarol 12: 103–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesel JT (1986) Effects of parental photoperiod regime on progeny development time in Drosophila simulans. Evolution 40:649–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil D, Graves J, Hazon N, Wells A (1999) Male attractiveness and differential testosterone investment in zebra finch eggs. Science 286:126–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hales CN, Barker DJP (2001) The thrifty phenotype hypothesis. Br Med Bull 60:5–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huestis DL, Marshall JL (2006) Interaction between maternal effects and temperature affects diapause occurrence in the cricket Allonemobius socius. Oecologia 146:513–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huey RB, Wakefield T, Crill WD, Gilchrist GW (1995) Within- and between-generation effects of temperature on early fecundity of Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 74:216–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt J, Simmons LW (1998) Patterns of parental provisioning covary with male morphology in a horned beetle (Onthophagus taurus) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 42:447–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolm N (2001) Females produce larger eggs for large males in a paternal mouthbrooding fish. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268:2229–2234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kotiaho JS, Simmons LW, Hunt J, Tomkins JL (2003) Males influence maternal effects that promote sexual selection: a quantitative genetic experiment with dung beetles Onthophagus taurus. Am Nat 161:852–859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mousseau TA, Fox CW (1998) Maternal effects as adaptations. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers JH, Boettner G, Elkinton J (1998) Maternal effects in gypsy moth: only sex ratio varies with population density. Ecology 79:305–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Noordwijk AJ, De Jong G (1986) Acquisition and allocation of resources: their influence on variation in life-history tactics. Am Nat 128:137–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plaistow SJ, Benton TG (2009) The influence of context-dependent maternal effects on population dynamics: an experimental test. Phil Trans R Soc B 364:1049–1058

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plaistow SJ, Lapsley CT, Beckerman AP, Benton TG (2004) Age and size at maturity: sex, environmental variability and developmental thresholds. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:919–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plaistow SJ, Lapsley CT, Benton TG (2006) Context-dependent intergenerational effects: the interaction between past and present environments and its effect on population dynamics. Am Nat 167:206–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad NG, Shakarad M, Rajamani M, Joshi A (2003) Interaction between the effects of maternal and larval levels of nutrition on pre-adult survival in Drosophila melanogaster. Evol Ecol Res 5:903–911

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest NK, Roach DA, Galloway LF (2008) Cross-generational fitness benefits of mating and seminal fluid. Biol Lett 4:6–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Radwan J (1995) Male morph determination in 2 species of acarid mites. Heredity 74:669–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radwan J (2007) Sexual selection and conflict in the bulb mite, Rhizoglyphus robini (Astigmata: Acaridae). Exp Appl Acarol 42:151–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts ML, Peters A (2009) Is testosterone immunosuppressive in a condition-dependent manner? An experimental test in blue tits. J Exp Biol 212:1811–1818

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smallegange IM (2011) Complex environmental effects on the expression of alternative reproductive phenotypes in the bulb mite. Evol Ecol. doi:10.1007/s10682-010-9446-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Smallegange IM, Coulson T (2011) The stochastic demography of two coexisting male morphs. Ecology 92: 755–764

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Stillwell RC, Blanckenhorn WU, Teder T, Davidowitz G, Fox CW (2010) Sex differences in phenotypic plasticity affect variation in sexual size dimorphism in insects: from physiology to evolution. Annu Rev Entomol 55:227–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wedell N (1996) Mate quality affects reproductive effort in a paternally investing species. Am Nat 148:1075–1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner J, Martinez S, Müller-Schärer H, Stoll P, Schmid B (1997) How important are environmental maternal effects in plants? A study with Centaureamaculosa. J Ecol 85:133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research for funding (Rubicon Fellowship), Tim Coulson and Mark Roberts for discussion and comments, and four anonymous referees for their comments. The experiments in this study comply with current laws in the UK.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Biology, Imperial College London, Silwood Park, Ascot, SL5 7PY, UK

    Isabel M. Smallegange

Authors
  1. Isabel M. Smallegange
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabel M. Smallegange.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smallegange, I.M. Effects of paternal phenotype and environmental variability on age and size at maturity in a male dimorphic mite. Naturwissenschaften 98, 339–346 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-011-0773-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-011-0773-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation