, Volume 96, Issue 9, pp 1115–1119 | Cite as

An immunological axis of biocontrol: infections in field-trapped insects



Insect immunology is an active research arena, however, the vast majority of research in the area is conducted on model species taken from laboratory cultures. We tested the hypothesis that insects are regularly exposed to infections or invasions in nature and here report results of a field study designed to assess the extent of natural infections in insects collected from agrarian fields surrounding Kahramanmaraş, Turkey. Specimens were dissected to assess numbers of nodules. Formation of darkened, melanotic nodules is the predominant cellular immune reaction to microbial and parasitic infection, and once formed, the nodules are permanently attached to internal surfaces. The collected insects were healthy. Of the >400 examined specimens, at least some nodules were found in 98%. Numbers of nodules ranged from ∼2/individual to >100 nodules/individual. We conclude that insects are regularly challenged by microbial and parasitic infections from which they recover. The novel implication of our data is that insect immune systems may limit the host range and effectiveness of agents deployed in biological control programs. Knowledge of insect immune systems may contribute to increased use of biopesticides globally.


Biological control Insect immunology Naturally occurring infections Nodulation 


  1. Eleftherianos I, Boundy S, Joyce SA, Aslam S, Marshall JW, Cox RJ, Simpson TJ, Clarke DJ, ffrench-Constant RH, Reynolds SE (2007) An antibiotic produced by an insect-pathogenic bacterium suppresses host defenses through phenoloxidase inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:2419–2424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Howard RW, Miller JS, Stanley DW (1998) The influence of bacterial species and intensity of infections on nodule formation in insects. J Insect Physiol 44:157–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Lacey LA, Frutos R, Kaya HK, Vail P (2001) Insect pathogens as biological control agents: do they have a future? Biol Control 21:230–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lavine MD, Strand MR (2002) Insect hemocytes and their role in immunity. Insect Biochem Molec Biol 32:1295–1309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lemaitre B, Hoffmann J (2007) The host defense of Drosophila melanogaster. Annu Rev Immunol 25:697–743PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lomer CJ (1999) Factors in the success and failure of microbial agents for control of migratory pests. Integrated Pest Management Rev. 4:307–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Miller JS, Stanley DW (1998) The nodule formation reaction to bacterial infection: Assessing the role of eicosanoids. In: Wiesner A et al (eds) Techniques in Insect Immunology. SOS, Fair Haven, NJ, pp 265–270Google Scholar
  8. Ouedraogo RM, Goettel MS, Brodeur J (2004) Behavioral thermoregulation in the migratory locust: a therapy to overcome fungal infection. Oecologia 138:312–319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. SAS Institute, Inc (1989) SAS/STAT User’s guide, version 8.0, vol 2, 4th edn. SAS, CaryGoogle Scholar
  10. Stanley, D.W. (2000) Methods for Modulating Eicosanoid-Mediated Immune Responses in Arthropods. US Patent Office #6099834Google Scholar
  11. Stanley DW, Miller JS (2006) Eicosanoid actions in insect cellular immune functions. Entomol Exp Appl 119:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Steinhaus EA (1957) Microbial diseases of insects. Annu Rev Microbiol 11:165–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wang C, St Leger RJ (2006) A collagenous protective coat enables Metarhizium anisopliae to evade insect immune responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:6647–6652PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Plant ProtectionKahramanmaraş Sütçü Imam UniversityKahramanmaraşTurkey
  2. 2.Biological Control of Insects Research LaboratoryUSDA/Agricultural Research ServiceColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations