Advertisement

Naturwissenschaften

, Volume 96, Issue 9, pp 1107–1113 | Cite as

Intraspecific competition and high food availability are associated with insular gigantism in a lizard

  • Panayiotis Pafilis
  • Shai Meiri
  • Johannes Foufopoulos
  • Efstratios Valakos
Short Communication

Abstract

Resource availability, competition, and predation commonly drive body size evolution. We assess the impact of high food availability and the consequent increased intraspecific competition, as expressed by tail injuries and cannibalism, on body size in Skyros wall lizards (Podarcis gaigeae). Lizard populations on islets surrounding Skyros (Aegean Sea) all have fewer predators and competitors than on Skyros but differ in the numbers of nesting seabirds. We predicted the following: (1) the presence of breeding seabirds (providing nutrients) will increase lizard population densities; (2) dense lizard populations will experience stronger intraspecific competition; and (3) such aggression, will be associated with larger average body size. We found a positive correlation between seabird and lizard densities. Cannibalism and tail injuries were considerably higher in dense populations. Increases in cannibalism and tail loss were associated with large body sizes. Adult cannibalism on juveniles may select for rapid growth, fuelled by high food abundance, setting thus the stage for the evolution of gigantism.

Keywords

Podarcis gaigeae Insularity Cannibalism Seabird subsidy Population density 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The study is in full compliance with Greek legislation for the Protection of Wildlife and Environment and was approved by the officer responsible for the well-being of study animals in the University of Athens. All animals were released into the wild after the end of the study. We are grateful to Wolfgang Böhme for offering access to the herpetological collections of the AKZM in Bonn and to our skipper Kyriakos Antonopoulos for local transportation. We also thank P. Lymberakis for map preparation.

References

  1. Adamopoulou C, Pafilis P, Valakos E (1999) Diet composition of Podarcis milensis, Podarcis gaigeae and Podarcis erhardii (Sauria: Lacertidae) during summer. Bonn Zool Beitr 48:275–282Google Scholar
  2. Anderson WB, Polis GA (1998) Marine subsidies of island communities in the Gulf of California: evidence from stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes. Oikos 81:75–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnold EN (1988) Caudal autotomy as a defense. In: Gans C, Huey RB (eds) Biology of the reptilia 16, ecology B: defense and life history. Liss, New York, pp 235–273Google Scholar
  4. Barrett K, Anderson WB, Wait AD, Grismer LL, Polis GA, Rose MD (2005) Marine subsidies alter the diet and abundance of insular and coastal lizard populations. Oikos 109:145–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boback SM (2003) Body size evolution in snakes: evidence from island populations. Copeia 2003:81–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonnet X, Pearson D, Ladyman M, Lourdais O, Bradshaw D (2002) Heaven’ for serpents? A mark–recapture study of tiger snakes (Notechis scutatus) on Carnac Island, Western Australia. Austral Ecol 27:442–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Case TJ (1978) A general explanation for insular body size trends in terrestrial vertebrates. Ecology 59:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Case TJ, Schwaner TD (1993) Island mainland body size differences in Australian varanid lizards. Oecologia 94:102–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Castilla AM, Van Damme R (1996) Cannibalistic propensities in the lizard Podarcis hispanica atrata. Copeia 4:991–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper WE, Pérez-Mellado V, Vitt LJ (2004) Ease and effectiveness of costly autotomy vary with predation intensity among lizard populations. J Zool 262:243–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Darlington RB, Smulders TV (2001) Problems with residual analysis. Anim Behav 62:599–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dayan T, Simberloff D (2005) Ecological and community-wide character displacement: the next generation. Ecol Lett 8:875–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elgar MA, Crespi BJ (1992) Cannibalism: ecology and evolution among diverse taxa. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Freckleton RP (2002) On the misuse of residuals in ecology: regression of residuals versus multiple regression. J Anim Ecol 71:542–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Garcia-Berthou E (2001) On the misuse of residuals in ecology: testing regression residuals vs. the analysis of covariance. J Anim Ecol 70:708–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goltsman ME, Kruchenkova P, Sergeev S, Volodin I, Macdonald DW (2005) ‘‘Island syndrome’’ in a population of Arctic foxes (Alopex lagopus) from Mednyi Island. J Zool 267:405–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gruber U (1986) Podarcis erhardii (Bedriaga, 1876) Ägäische Mauereidechse. In: Böhme W (ed) Handbuch der Reptilien und Amphibian Europas, Echsen 3. Aula, Wiesbaden, pp 25–49Google Scholar
  18. Handrinos G, Akriotis T (1997) Birds of Greece. Helm and Black, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Jaeger RG (1994) Transect sampling. In: Heyer WR, Donnelly MA, McDiarmin RW, Hayek LC, Foster MC (eds) Measuring and monitoring biological diversity. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp 103–107Google Scholar
  20. Jennings WB, Thompson GG (1999) Territorial behavior in the Australian scincid lizard Ctenotus fallens. Herpetologica 55:352–361Google Scholar
  21. Jenssen TA, Nunez SC (1998) Spatial and breeding relationships of the lizard, Anolis carolinensis: evidence of intra-sexual selection. Behavior 135:981–1003Google Scholar
  22. Jenssen TA, Marcellini DL, Buhlmann KA, Goforth PH (1989) Differential infanticide by adult curly-tailed lizards, Leiocephalus schreibersi. Anim Behav 38:1054–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lack D (1954) The natural regulation of animal numbers. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Langkilde T, Shine R (2007) Interspecific conflict in lizards: social dominance depends upon an individual’s species not its body size. Austral Ecol 32:869–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Le Galliard JF, Ferrière R, Clobert J (2005) Juvenile growth and survival under dietary restriction: are males and females equal? Oikos 111:368–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lomolino MV (2005) Body size evolution in insular vertebrates: generality of the island rule. J Biogeogr 32:1683–1699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Markwell TJ, Daugherty CH (2002) Invertebrate and lizard abundance is greater on seabird-inhabited islands than on seabird-free islands in the Marlborough Sounds, New Zealand. Ecoscience 9:293–299Google Scholar
  28. Meiri S (2007) Size evolution in island lizards. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:702–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meiri S (2008) Evolution and ecology of lizard body sizes. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17:724–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meiri S, Dayan T, Simberloff D (2004) Body size of insular carnivore: little support for the island rule. Am Nat 163:469–479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meiri S, Dayan T, Simberloff D (2005) Area, isolation and body size evolution in insular carnivores. Ecol Lett 8:1211–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Melton RH (1982) Body size and island Peromyscus: a pattern and a hypothesis. Evol Theor 6:113–126Google Scholar
  33. Olsson M, Wapstra E, Olofsson C (2002) Offspring size–number strategies: experimental manipulation of offspring size in a viviparous lizard (Lacerta vivipara). Funct Ecol 16:135–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pafilis P, Valakos ED, Foufopoulos J (2005) Comparative postautotomy tail activity in six Mediterranean lacertid species. Physiol Biochem Zool 78:828–838PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pafilis P, Pérez-Mellado V, Valakos ED (2008) Post autotomy tail activity in Balearic wall lizard, Podarcis lilfordi. Naturwissenschaften 95:217–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pafilis P, Foufopoulos J, Poulakakis N, Lymberakis P, Valakos ED (2009) Tail shedding in island lizards [Lacertidae, Reptilia]: Decline of antipredator defenses in relaxed predation environments. Evolution 63:1262–1278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pérez-Mellado V, Corti C, LoCascio P (1997) Tail autotomy and extinction in Mediterranean lizards. A preliminary study of continental and insular populations. J Zool 243:553–541Google Scholar
  38. Pianka ER (1970) Comparative autecology of the lizard Cnemidophorus tigris in different parts of its geographic range. Ecology 51:703–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Polis GA, Myers CA (1985) A survey of intraspecific predation among reptiles and amphibians. J Herpetol 19:99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Polis GA, Hurd SD (1996) Linking marine and terrestrial food webs: allochthonous input from the ocean supports high secondary productivity on small islands and coastal land communities. Am Nat 147:396–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Raia P, Meiri S (2006) The island rule in large mammals: paleontology meets ecology. Evolution 60:1731–1742PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Sadek RA (1981) The diet of the Madeiran lizard Lacerta dugesii. Zool J Linn Soc 73:313–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Salvador A (1986) Podarcis lilfordi (Gunther, 1874)- Balearen- Eidechse. In: Boehme W (ed) Handbuch der Reptilien und Amphibien Europas 2, Echsen 3. Aula, Wiesbaden, pp 83–110Google Scholar
  44. Sanchez-Piñero F, Polis GA (2000) Bottom-up dynamics of allochthonous input: direct and indirect effects of seabirds on islands. Ecology 81:3117–3132Google Scholar
  45. Sinervo B (1993) The effect of offspring size on physiology and life history: Manipulation of size using allometric engineering. Bioscience 43:210–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sinervo B, Svensson E, Comendant T (2000) Density cycles and an offspring quantity and quality game driven by natural selection. Nature 406:985–988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smith RJ (1999) Statistics of sexual size dimorphism. J Hum Evol 36:423–459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sobey DG, Kenworthy JB (1979) The relationship between herring gulls and the vegetation of their breeding colonies. J Ecol 67:469–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sondaar PY (1977) Insularity and its effects on mammal evolution. In: Hecht MK, Goody PC, Hecht BM (eds) Major patterns of vertebrate evolution. Plenum, New York, pp 671–707Google Scholar
  50. Stamps JA, Tanaka S (1981) The influence of food and water on growth rates in a tropical lizard (Anolis aeneus). Ecology 62:33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Turner FB, Medica PA, Jennrich RI, Maza BG (1982) Frequencies of broken tails among Uta stansburiana in southern Nevada and a test of the predation hypothesis. Copeia 1982:835–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Valakos ED, Pafilis P, Sotiropoulos K, Lymberakis P, Maragou P, Foufopoulos J (2008) The amphibians and reptiles of Greece. Edition Chimaira, Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  53. Vervust B, Grbac I, Van Damme R (2007) Differences in morphology, performance and behaviour between recently diverged populations of Podarcis sicula mirror differences in predation pressure. Oikos 116:1343–1352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wagner JD, Wise DH (1996) Cannibalism regulates densities of young wolf spiders: evidence from field and laboratory experiments. Ecology 77:639–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wu Z, Li Y, Murray BR (2006) Insular shifts in body size of rice frogs in the Zhoushan Archipelago, China. J Anim Ecol 75:1071–1080PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Panayiotis Pafilis
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shai Meiri
    • 3
  • Johannes Foufopoulos
    • 1
  • Efstratios Valakos
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Natural Resources & EnvironmentUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Department of Classical Studies, Modern Greek ProgramUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  3. 3.NERC Centre for Population BiologyImperial College LondonAscotUK
  4. 4.Department of BiologyUniversity of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations