, Volume 96, Issue 3, pp 347–353 | Cite as

Does the introduced brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) affect growth of the native brown trout (Salmo trutta)?

  • Kai Korsu
  • Ari Huusko
  • Timo Muotka
Original Paper


Non-native brook trout have become widely established in North European streams. We combined evidence from an artificial-stream experiment and drainage-scale field surveys to examine whether brook trout suppressed the growth of the native brown trout (age 0 to age 2). Our experimental results demonstrated that brown trout were unaffected by the presence of brook trout but that brook trout showed reduced growth in the presence of brown trout. However, the growth reduction only appeared in the experimental setting, indicating that the reduced spatial constraint of the experimental system may have forced the fish to unnaturally intense interactions. Indeed, in the field, no effect of either species on the growth of the putative competitor was detected. These results caution against uncritical acceptance of findings from small-scale experiments because they rarely scale up to more complex field situations. This and earlier work suggest that the establishment of brook trout in North European streams has taken place mainly because of the availability of unoccupied (or underutilized) niche space, rather than as a result of species trait combinations or interspecific competition per se.


Alien species Boreal streams Interspecific competition Multiscale Salmonids 



Pekka Hyvärinen, Pekka Korhonen, and the staff of the Kainuu and Taivalkoski Fisheries Research offered logistical help during the experiments. Sini Heino, Jarmo Huhtala, Kaisa Huttunen, Sami Kivelä, Kimmo Kolkkinen, Vesa Rantanen, Tapio Rautiainen, Maare Saraniemi, Olli van der Meer, and Veikko Virkkunen helped us conduct the field surveys. We appreciate the comments made by Jani Heino and three anonymous referees on a previous version of the manuscript. Our research was funded by Maj and Tor Nessling Foundation, Academy of Finland and University of Oulu (Thule Institute).

The experiments comply with the current laws of Finland.

Supplementary material

114_2008_482_MOESM1_ESM.doc (28 kb)
ESM 1 (doc 28.5 KB)


  1. Blanchet S, Loot G, Grenouillet G, Brosse S (2007) Competitive interactions between native and exotic salmonids: a combined field and laboratory demonstration. Ecol Freshw Fish 16:133–143Google Scholar
  2. Brittain JE, Eikeland TJ (1988) Invertebrate drift—a review. Hydrobiologia 166:77–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carlson SM, Hendry AP, Letcher BH (2007) Growth rate differences between resident native brook trout and non-native brown trout. J Fish Biol 71:1430–1447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cucherousset J, Aymes JC, Poulet N, Santoul F, Céréghino R (2008) Do native brown trout and non-native brook trout interact reproductively? Naturwissenschaften 95:647–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dahl J (1998) Effects of a benthivorous and a drift-feeding fish on a benthic stream assemblage. Oecologia 116:426–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DeWald L, Wilzbach MA (1992) Interactions between native brook trout and hatchery brown trout: effects on habitat use, feeding, and growth. Trans Am Fish Soc 121:287–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dunham JB, Adams SB, Schroeter RE, Novinger DC (2002) Alien invasions in aquatic ecosystems: Toward an understanding of brook trout invasions and potential impacts on inland cutthroat trout in western North America. Rev Fish Biol Fish 12:373–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elliott JM, Hurley MA, Fryer RJ (1995) A new, improved growth model for brown trout, Salmo trutta. Funct Ecol 9:290–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fausch KD (2008) A paradox of trout invasions in North America. Biol Invasions 10:685–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Flebbe PA (1994) A regional view of the margin: salmonid abundance and distribution in the southern Appalachian mountains of North Carolina and Virginia. Trans Am Fish Soc 123:657–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kerr SJ, Grant RE (1999) Ecological impacts of fish introductions: Evaluating the risk. Fish and Wildlife Branch, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Petersborough, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  12. Korsu K, Huusko A, Muotka T (2007) Niche characteristics explain the reciprocal invasion success of stream salmonids in different continents. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:9725–9729PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Korsu K, Huusko A, Muotka T (2008) Ecology of alien species with special reference to stream salmonids. Boreal Env Res 13(Suppl. A):43–52Google Scholar
  14. Lodge DM (1993) Biological invasions: lessons for ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 8:133–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McGrath CC, Lewis Jr WM (2007) Competition and predation as mechanisms for displacement of greenback cutthroat trout by brook trout. Trans Am Fish Soc 136:1381–1392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meissner K, Muotka T (2006) The role of trout in stream food webs: integrating evidence from field surveys and experiments. J Anim Ecol 75:421–433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moyle PB, Marchetti MP (2006) Predicting invasion success: freshwater fishes in California as a model. BioScience 56:515–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nakano S (1995) Competitive interactions for foraging microhabitats in a size-structured interspecific dominance hierarchy of two sympatric stream salmonids in a natural habitat. Can J Zool 73:1845–1854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nakano S, Miyasaka H, Kuhara N (1999) Terrestrial-aquatic linkages: riparian arthropod inputs alter trophic cascades in a stream food web. Ecology 80:2435–2441Google Scholar
  20. Öhlund G, Nordwall F, Degerman E, Eriksson T (2008) Life history and large-scale habitat use of brown trout (Salmo trutta) and brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis)—implications for species replacement. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 65:633–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Peterson AT, Vieglais DA (2001) Predicting species invasions using ecological niche modeling: new approaches from bioinformatics attack a pressing problem. BioScience 51:363–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rahel FJ, Nibbelink NP (1999) Spatial patterns in relations among brown trout (Salmo trutta) distribution, summer air temperature, and stream size in Rocky Mountain streams. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56(Suppl. 1):43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ruesink JL (2005) Global analysis of factors affecting the outcome of freshwater fish introductions. Cons Biol 19:1883–1893Google Scholar
  24. Sax DF, Brown JH (2000) The paradox of invasion. Global Ecol Biogeo 9:363–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Simberloff D (2006) Invasional meltdown 6 years later: important phenomenon, unfortunate metaphor, or both. Ecol Lett 9:912–919PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Spens J, Alanärä A, Eriksson L-O (2007) Nonnative brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and the demise of native brown trout (Salmo trutta) in northern boreal lakes: stealthy, long-term patterns. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 64:654–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stoneman CL, Jones ML (2000) The influence of habitat features on the biomass and distribution of three species of southern Ontario stream salmonines. Trans Am Fish Soc 129:639–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Taniguchi Y, Fausch KD, Nakano S (2002) Size-structured interactions between native and introduced species: can intraguild predation facilitate invasion by stream salmonids. Biol Invasions 4:223–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vehanen T (2006) Intra- and interspecific competition in hatchery landlocked salmon and brown trout in semi-natural streams. Environ Biol Fishes 76:255–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vila-Gispert A, Alcaraz C, Garcia-Berthou E (2005) Life-history traits of invasive fish in small Mediterranean streams. Biol Invasions 7:107–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Waters TF (1999) Long-term trout production dynamics in Valley Creek, Minnesota. Trans Am Fish Soc 128:1151–1162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weber ED, Fausch KD (2003) Interactions between hatchery and wild salmonids in streams: differences in biology and evidence for competition. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 60:1018–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Werner EE (1998) Ecological experiments and a research program in community ecology. In: Resetarits Jr WJ, Bernardo J (eds) Experimental ecology. Issues and perspectives. Oxford University Press, pp 3–26Google Scholar
  34. Young KA (2004) Asymmetric competition, habitat selection, and niche overlap in juvenile salmonids. Ecology 85:134–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zorn TG, Nuhfer AJ (2007) Influences on brown trout and brook trout population dynamics in a Michigan river. Trans Am Fish Soc 136:691–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of OuluOuluFinland
  2. 2.Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute, Kainuu Fisheries ResearchPaltamoFinland
  3. 3.Finnish Environment Institute, Research Program for BiodiversityUniversity of OuluOuluFinland

Personalised recommendations