Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Where are the Sunday babies? III. Caesarean sections, decreased weekend births, and midwife involvement in Germany

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Naturwissenschaften Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A previous study has shown a marked and continuing decline in weekend births in Germany between 1988 and 2003 (Lerchl, Naturwissenschaften 92:592–594, 2005). The present study was performed to investigate the possible influence of caesarean sections (CS) on weekend birth number and on the involvement of midwives in births for all 16 German states for the year 2003. In total, data from 706,721 births were sorted according to weekday of births and state, respectively, and the weekend births avoidance rates were calculated. Weekend births were consistently less frequent than births during the week, with an average of −15.3% for all states and due to fewer births on Saturdays (−13.6%) and Sundays (−16.7%). Between the states, weekend births avoidance rates ranged from −11.6% (Bremen) to −24.2% (Saarland). The proportion of CS was 25.5% for all states, ranging from 19.2% (Sachsen and Sachsen-Anhalt) to 30.5% (Saarland). CS and weekend births avoidance rates were significantly correlated, consistent with the hypothesis that primary (planned) CS are regularly scheduled on weekdays. The number of births per midwife (BPM) was calculated according to the number of active members in the states’ professional midwives’ organizations. The mean number of BPM was 59.5, ranging from 45.2 (Bremen) to 82.4 (Sachsen-Anhalt). CS and BPM were significantly correlated, consistent with the hypothesis that higher CS ratios are associated with lower midwife involvement in births. It is concluded that the decline in weekend births and lower involvement of midwives are caused, at least in part, by an increased number of caesarean sections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Agresti A, Caffo B (2000) Simple and effective confidence intervals for proportions and differences of proportions result from adding two successes and two failures. Am Stat 54:280–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black C, Kaye JA, Jick H (2005) Cesarean delivery in the United Kingdom: time trends in the general practice research database. Obstet Gynecol 106:151–155

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buhimschi CS, Buhimschi IA (2006) Advantages of vaginal delivery. Clin Obstet Gynecol 49:167–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diniz SG, Chacham AS (2004) “The cut above” and “the cut below”: the abuse of caesareans and episiotomy in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Reprod Health Matters 12:100–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstick O, Weissman A, Drugan A (2003) The circadian rhythm of “urgent” operative deliveries. Isr Med Assoc J 5:564–566

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman MJ, Nelson WW, Maciosek MV (2005) Births by day of week: a historical perspective. J Midwifery Womens Health 50:39–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gould JB, Qin C, Marks AR, Chavez G (2003) Neonatal mortality in weekend vs weekday births. JAMA 289:2958–2962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hakansson S, Kallen K (2003) Caesarean section increases the risk of hospital care in childhood for asthma and gastroenteritis. Clin Exp Allergy 33:757–764

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry RA (1981) The weekend—a dangerous time to be born? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 88:1200–1203

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kozak LJ, Owings MF, Hall MJ (2005) National Hospital Discharge Survey: 2002 annual summary with detailed diagnosis and procedure data. Vital Health Stat 13:1–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerchl A (2005) Where are the Sunday babies? Observations on a marked decline in weekend births in Germany. Naturwissenschaften 92:592–594

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lerchl A, Reinhard S (2007) Where are the Sunday babies? II. Declining weekend birth rates in Switzerland. Naturwissenschaften (this issue). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00114-007-0305-4

  • Liu S, Rusen ID, Joseph KS, Liston R, Kramer MS, Wen SW, Kinch R (2004) Recent trends in caesarean delivery rates and indications for caesarean delivery in Canada. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 26:735–742

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane A (1978) Variations in number of births and perinatal mortality by day of week in England and Wales. Br Med J 2:1670–1673

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Munson ML (2003) Births: final data for 2002. Natl Vital Stat Rep 52:1–113

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin JA, Kochanek KD, Strobino DM, Guyer B, MacDorman MF (2005) Annual summary of vital statistics—2003. Pediatrics 115:619–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mathers CD (1983) Births and perinatal deaths in Australia: variations by day of week. J Epidemiol Community Health 37:57–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mossialos E, Allin S, Karras K, Davaki K (2005) An investigation of caesarean sections in three Greek hospitals: the impact of financial incentives and convenience. Eur J Public Health 15:288–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oladapo OT, Sotunsa JO, Sule-Odu AO (2004) The rise in caesarean birth rate in Sagamu, Nigeria: reflection of changes in obstetric practice. J Obstet Gynaecol 24:377–381

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Renz-Polster H, David MR, Buist AS, Vollmer WM, O’Connor EA, Frazier EA, Wall MA (2005) Caesarean section delivery and the risk of allergic disorders in childhood. Clin Exp Allergy 35:1466–1472

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz CM, Schücking BA (2004) Adieu normale Geburt? Ergebnisse eines Forschungsprojekts. Dr Med Mabuse 148:22–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Signorelli C, Ferdico M, Cattaruzza MS, Osborn JF (1991) Indications for caesarean section: results of a local study. Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat 112:15–19

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson KR, Atterbury J (2003) Trends and issues in labor induction in the United States: implications for clinical practice. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 32:767–779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson KR, Thorman KE (2005) Obstetric “conveniences”: elective induction of labor, cesarean birth on demand, and other potentially unnecessary interventions. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 19:134–144

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner M (2001) Fish can’t see water: the need to humanize birth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 75(Suppl 1):S25–S37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ZQG (2004) Zentrum für Qualitätsmanagement im Gesundheitswesen: Qualitätsbericht Geburtshilfe Jahresauswertung 2004.

Download references

Acknowledgments

I wish to thank the following persons for help: Barbara Rösel, Statistisches Landesamt Bremen; Prof. Adalbert Wilhelm, Jacobs University; Dr. Lothar Baumann, Statistisches Landesamt Baden-Württemberg; Rainhild Schäfers, Bund Deutscher Hebammen, Münster, and AOK-Bundesverband, Bonn.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Engineering and Science, Jacobs University Bremen, Campus Ring 6, D-28759, Bremen, Germany

    Alexander Lerchl

Authors
  1. Alexander Lerchl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Lerchl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lerchl, A. Where are the Sunday babies? III. Caesarean sections, decreased weekend births, and midwife involvement in Germany. Naturwissenschaften 95, 165–170 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-007-0306-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-007-0306-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation