Naturwissenschaften

, Volume 94, Issue 8, pp 651–656 | Cite as

Developmental environment, cultural transmission, and mate choice copying

Original Paper

Abstract

Using female mate choice copying as a rudimentary form of cultural transmission, this study provides evidence that social environment during development has a significant effect on the tendency to use culturally acquired information. Groups of newborn guppies (Poecilia reticulata) were raised for 35 days in 1 of 5 “developmental environments”. Groups of 15 newborns were raised in pools with no adults (treatment 1), both adult male and female guppies (treatments 2 and 3), only adult females (treatment 4) or only adult males (treatment 5). Mature females raised in treatments 1 and 2, but not treatments 3, 4, and 5, copied the mate choice of others. Treatments 1 and 2 correspond to social structures that guppies experience during their development in the wild. Newborn guppies swim together in shoals (analogous to treatment 1). As they mature, juveniles join schools of adult males and females (analogous to treatments 2). At no time during the normal developmental process are juveniles found with males, but only unreceptive females (as was the case for long periods in treatment 3) or in the presence of adults of only one sex (analogous to treatments 4 and 5). As such, normal developmental environments prime guppies for cultural transmission, while unnatural environments fail to do so.

References

  1. Bischoff RJ, Gould JL, Rubenstein DI (1985) Tail size and female choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:252–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  3. Briggs SE, Godin JJ, Dugatkin LA (1996) Mate-choice copying under predation risk in the Trinidadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol 7:151–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brooks R (1996) Copying and the repeatability of mate choice. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 39:323–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Curio E, Ernest U, Vieth W (1978) Cultural transmission of enemy recognition: one function of mobbing. Science 202:899–901CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. De Waal FBM (2001) The ape and the sushi master. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Dugatkin L, Druen M, Godin JG (2002) The disruption hypothesis does not explain mate-choice copying in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Ethology 108:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dugatkin LA (1992) Sexual selection and imitation: females copy the mate choice of others. Am Nat 139:1384–1389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dugatkin LA (1996a) Copying and mate choice. In: Heyes C, Galef G (eds) Social learning in animals: the roots of culture. Academic, New York, pp 85–105Google Scholar
  10. Dugatkin LA (1996b) The interface between culturally-based preferences and genetic preferences: female mate choice in Poecilia reticulata. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:2770–2773PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dugatkin LA (1998) Genes, copying and female mate choice: shifting thresholds. Behav Ecol 9:323–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dugatkin LA (2000) The imitation factor: evolution beyond the gene. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Dugatkin LA, Godin J-GJ (1992) Reversal of female mate choice by copying in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Proc R Soc Lond B 249:179–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dugatkin LA, Godin J-GJ (1993) Female mate copying in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata: age dependent effects. Behav Ecol 4:289–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Endler JA, Houde AE (1995) Geographic variation in female preferences for male traits in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 49:456–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freeberg T (1996) Assortative mating in captive cowbirds is predicted by social experience. Anim Behav 52:1129–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Freeberg T, King A, West M (1995) Social malleability in cowbirds (Molothrus ater artemisiae): species and mate recognition in the first two years of life. J Comp Physiol Psychol 109:357–367Google Scholar
  18. Freeberg TM (1998) The cultural transmission of courtship patterns in cowbirds, Molothrus ater. Anim Behav 56:1063–1073PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Freeberg TM (2004) Social transmission of courtship behavior and mating preferences in brown-headed cowbirds, Molothrus ater. Learning and Behavior 32:122–130PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Galef B, Clark M (1972) Mother’s milk and adult presence: two factors determining initial dietary selection by weaning rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol 78:220–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Galef B, Henderson P (1972) Mother’s milk: a determinant of feeding preferences of weaning rat pups. J Comp Physiol Psychol 78:213–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Galef B, Sherry D (1973) Mother’s milk: a medium of transmission of cues reflecting the flavor of mother’s diet. J Comp Physiol Psychol 83:374–378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Galef BG (1996) Social enhancement of food preferences in Norway Rats: a brief review. In: Heyes CM, Galef BG (eds) Social learning in animals: the roots of culture. Academic, London, pp 49–64Google Scholar
  24. Galef BG, White DJ (1998) Mate-choice copying in Japanese quail, Coturnix cotturnix japonica. Anim Behav 55:545–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goldschmidt T, Bakker TC, Feuth-De Bruijn E (1993) Selective copying in mate choice of female sticklebacks. Anim Behav 45:541–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heyes CM, Galef BG (eds) (1996) Social learning in animals: the roots of culture. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Hoglund J, Alatalo R, Gibson R, Lundberg A (1995) Mate-choice copying in black grouse. Anim Behav 49:1627–1633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hoglund J, Alatalo RV, Lundberg A (1990) Copying the mate choice of others? Observations on female black grouse. Behaviour 114:221–236Google Scholar
  29. Houde AE (1997) Sex, color and mate choice in guppies. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  30. Kodric-Brown A (1990) Mechanisms of sexual selection: insights from fishes. Ann Zool Fennici 27:87–100Google Scholar
  31. Lafleur DL, Lozano GA, Sclafini M (1997) Female mate-choice copying in guppies, Poecilia reticulata: a reevaluation. Anim Behav 54:579–586PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Laland K, Williams K (1998) Social transmission of maladaptive information in the guppy. Behav Ecol 9:493–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Laland KN, Hoppitt W (2003) Do animals have culture? Evol Anthropol 12:150–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Laland KN, Reader SM (1999) Foraging innovation in the guppy. Anim Behav 57:331–340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Liley NR (1966) Ethological isolating mechanisms in four sympatric species of Poeciliid fishes. Behav Suppl 31:1–197Google Scholar
  36. Magurran AE (2005) Evolutionary ecology: the Trinidadian guppy. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  37. Magurran AE, Seghers BH, Shaw PW, Carvalho GR (1995) The behavioral diversity and evolution of guppy, Poecilia reticulata, populations in Trinidad. Adv Study Behav 24:155–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pruett-Jones SG (1992) Independent versus non-independent mate choice: do females copy each other? Am Nat 140:1000–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reader S, Laland K (eds) (2003) Animal innovation. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  40. Reader SM, Kendal JR, Laland KN (2003) Social learning of foraging sites and escape routes in wild Trinidadian guppies. Anim Behav 66:729–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Reader SM, Laland KN (2000) Diffusion of foraging innovations in the guppy. Anim Behav 60:175–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reader SM, Laland KN (2002) Social intelligence, innovation and enhanced brain size in primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:4436–4441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rendell E, Whitehead H (2001) Culture in whales and dolphins. Behav Brain Sci 24:309–382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schlupp I, Marler C, Ryan M (1994) Males benefit by mating with heterospecific females. Science 263:373–374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Seghers BH (1973) An analysis of geographic variation in the antipredator adaptations of the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Ph.D. thesis, University of British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  46. Sherry D, Galef BG (1984) Cultural transmission without imitation: milk bottle opening by birds. Anim Behav 32:937–939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Terkel J (1995) Cultural transmission in the black rat: pine-cone feeding. Adv Study Behav 24:119–154Google Scholar
  48. Tinbergen N (1963) On aims and methods of ethology. Z Tierpsychol 20:410–440Google Scholar
  49. West M, King A, Harrocks T (1983) Cultural transmission of cowbird (Molothrus ater) song: measuring its development and outcome. J Comp Physiol Psychol 97:327–337Google Scholar
  50. West MJ, King AP, White DJ (2003) The case for developmental ecology. Anim Behav 66:617–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. White DJ, Galef BG (2000) ‘Culture’ in quail: social influences on mate choices of female Coturnix japonica. Anim Behav 59:975–979PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Whiten A (2000) Primate culture and social learning. Cogn Sci 24:477–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Whiten A (2005) The second inheritance system of chimpanzees and humans. Nature 437:52–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Whiten A, Goodall J, McGrew W, Nishida T, Reynolds V, Sugiyama Y, Tutin C, Wrangham R, Boesch C (1999) Cultures in chimpanzees. Nature 399:682–685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Whiten A, Goodall J, McGrew WC, Nishida T, Reynolds V, Sugiyama Y, Tutin CEG, Wrangham RW, Boesch C (2001) Charting cultural variation in chimpanzees. Behavior 138:1481–1516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Whiten A, Horner V, de Waal FBM (2005) Conformity to cultural norms of tool use in chimpanzees. Nature 437:737–740PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zentall TR (2001) Imitation in animals: evidence, function, and mechanisms. Cybern Syst 32:53–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zentall TR, Galef BG (1988) Social learning: psychological and biological perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of LouisvilleLouisvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations