Skip to main content
Log in

Brain modulation of Dufour’s gland ester biosynthesis in vitro in the honeybee (Apis mellifera)

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Naturwissenschaften Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Caste-specific pheromone biosynthesis is a prerequisite for reproductive skew in the honeybee. Nonetheless, this process is not hardwired but plastic, in that egg-laying workers produce a queen-like pheromone. Studies with Dufour’s gland pheromone revealed that, in vivo, workers’ gland biosynthesis matches the social status of the worker, i.e., sterile workers showed a worker-like pattern whereas fertile workers showed a queen-like pattern (production of the queen-specific esters). However, when incubated in vitro, the gland spontaneously exhibits the queen-like pattern, irrespective of its original worker type, prompting the notion that ester production in workers is under inhibitory control that is queen-dependent. We tested this hypothesis by exposing queen or worker Dufour’s glands in vitro to brain extracts of queens, queenright (sterile) workers and males. Unexpectedly, worker brain extracts activated the queen-like esters biosynthesis in workers’ Dufour’s gland. This stimulation was gender-specific; queen or worker brains demonstrated a stimulatory activity, but male brains did not. Queen gland could not be further stimulated. Bioassays with heated and filtered extracts indicate that the stimulatory brain factor is below 3,000 Da. We suggest that pheromone production in Dufour’s gland is under dual, negative–positive control. Under queenright conditions, the inhibitor is released and blocks ester biosynthesis, whereas under queenless conditions, the activator is released, activating ester biosynthesis in the gland. This is consistent with the hypothesis that queenright workers are unequivocally recognized as non-fertile, whereas queenless workers try to become “false queens” as part of the reproductive competition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Dombroski TCD, Simoes ZLP, Bitondi MMG (2003) Dietary dopamine causes ovary activation in queenless Apis mellifera workers. Apidologie 34:281–289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dor R, Katzav-Gozansky T, Hefetz A (2005) Dufour’s gland pheromone as a reliable fertility signal among honeybee (Apis mellifera) workers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58:270–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris JW, Woodring J (1995) Elevated brain dopamine levels associated with ovary development in queenless worker honey bees (Apis mellifera L). Comp Biochem Physiol 111:271–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover SER, Keeling CI, Winston ML, Slessor KN (2003) The effect of queen pheromones on worker honey bee ovary development. Naturwissenschaften 90:477–480

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jurenka RA (2004) Insect pheromone biosynthesis. Top Curr Chem 239:97–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katzav-Gozansky T, Soroker V, Hefetz A, Cojocaru M, Erdmann DH, Francke W (1997) Plasticity of caste-specific Dufour’s gland secretion in the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Naturwissenschaften 84:238–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katzav-Gozansky T, Soroker V, Hefetz A (2000) Plasticity in caste-related exocrine secretion biosynthesis in the honeybee (Apis mellifera). J Insect Physiol 46:993–998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katzav-Gozansky T, Boulay R, Soroker V, Hefetz A (2004) Queen signal modulation of worker pheromonal composition in honeybees. Proc R Soc London B 271:2065–2069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzav-Gozansky T, Boulay R, Soroker V, Hefetz A (2006) Queen pheromones affecting the production of queen-like secretion in workers. J Comp Physiol A 192:737–742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keller L, Nonacs P (1993) The role of queen pheromones in social insects: queen control or queen signal? Anim Behav 45:787–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makert GR, Paxton RJ, Hartfelder K (2006) Ovariole number—a predictor of differential reproductive success among worker subfamilies in queenless honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:815–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki K, Nagao T (2001) Distribution and levels of dopamine and its metabolites in brains of reproductive workers in honeybees. J Insect Physiol 47:1205–1216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tillman JA, Seybold SJ, Jurenka RA, Blomquist GJ (1999) Insect pheromones—an overview of biosynthesis and endocrine regulation. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 29:481–514

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Visscher PK (1989) A quantitative study of worker reproduction in honey bee colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:247–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visscher PK, Dukas R (1995) Honey bees recognize development of nestmates’ ovaries. Anim Behav 49:542–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss SA, Smith GC, Kalter SS, Vaughn JL (1981) Improved method for the production of insect cell-cultures in large volume. In Vitro 17:495–502

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Israel Science Foundation founded by the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities grant no. 720/04 to Abraham Hefetz. We thank Tovit Simon and Sharon Lefler for their technical help and Naomi Paz for the editorial assistance. This manuscript is contribution no. 507/06 from the Volcani Center, Israel. The experiments comply with the current laws of Israel.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tamar Katzav-Gozansky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Katzav-Gozansky, T., Hefetz, A. & Soroker, V. Brain modulation of Dufour’s gland ester biosynthesis in vitro in the honeybee (Apis mellifera). Naturwissenschaften 94, 407–411 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-006-0206-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-006-0206-y

Keywords

Navigation