Abstract
Genetic variation in honeybee, Apis mellifera, populations can be considerably influenced by breeding and commercial introductions, especially in areas with abundant beekeeping. However, in southern Africa apiculture is based on the capture of wild swarms, and queen rearing is virtually absent. Moreover, the introduction of European subspecies constantly failed in the Cape region. We therefore hypothesize a low human impact on genetic variation in populations of Cape honeybees, Apis mellifera capensis. A novel solution to studying genetic variation in honeybee populations based on thelytokous worker reproduction is applied to test this hypothesis. Environmental effects on metrical morphological characters of the phenotype are separated to obtain a genetic residual component. The genetic residuals are then re-calculated as coefficients of genetic variation. Characters measured included hair length on the abdomen, width and length of wax plate, and three wing angles. The data show for the first time that genetic variation in Cape honeybee populations is independent of beekeeping density and probably reflects naturally occurring processes such as gene flow due to topographic and climatic variation on a microscale.
References
Hepburn HR, Jacot Guillarmod A (1991) The Cape honeybee and the fynbos biome. S Afr J Sci 87:70–73
Hepburn HR, Radloff SE (1998) Honeybees of Africa. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Hepburn HR, Radloff SE, Fuchs S (1998) Population structure and the interface between Apis mellifera capensis and Apis mellifera scutellata. Apidologie 29:333–346
Johannsmeier MF (2001) Beekeeping in South Africa. Plant Protection Research Institute Handbook No 14, Pretoria, South Africa
Laidlaw HH Jr, Page RE Jr (1997) Queen rearing and bee breeding. Wicwas, Cheshire, Conn., USA
Moritz RFA, Klepsch A (1985) Estimating heritabilities of worker characteristics: a new approach using laying workers of the Cape honeybee (Apis mellifera capensis). Apidologie 16:47–56
Neumann P, Hepburn HR, Radloff SE (2000) Modes of worker reproduction, reproductive dominance and brood cell construction in queenless honeybee (Apis mellifera) colonies, Apidologie 31:479–486
Normark BB (2003) The evolution of alternative genetic systems in insects. Annu Rev Entomol 48:397–423
Oldroyd BP, Cornuet JM, Rowe D, Rinderer TE, Crozier RH (1995) Racial admixture of Apis mellifera in Tasmania, Australia: similarities and differences with natural hybrid zones in Europe. Heredity 74:315–325
Radloff SE, Hepburn HR, Neumann P, Moritz RFA, Kryger P (2002) Quantification of environmental effects on the phenotypic expression of morphological characters in isogenic honeybees, Apis mellifera capensis (Esch.). Apidologie 33:129–137
Rao PV (1998) Statistical research methods in the life sciences. Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, Calif., USA
Rinderer TE (1986) Bee genetics and breeding. Academic Press, Orlando, Fla., USA
Ruttner F (1988) Biogeography and taxonomy of honeybees. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Acknowledgements
Financial support was granted to P.N. by an Emmy Nöther fellowship of the DFG.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hepburn, R., Neumann, P. & Radloff, S.E. Genetic variation in natural honeybee populations, Apis mellifera capensis. Naturwissenschaften 91, 447–450 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-004-0556-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-004-0556-2