Skip to main content
Log in

Does the queen win it all? Queen–worker conflict over male production in the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Naturwissenschaften Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social insects provide a useful model for studying the evolutionary balance between cooperation and conflict linked to genetic structure. We investigated the outcome of this conflict in the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris, whose annual colony life cycle is characterized by overt competition over male production. We established artificial colonies composed of a queen and unrelated workers by daily exchange of callow workers between colony pairs of distinct genetic make-up. Using microsatellite analysis, this procedure allowed an exact calculation of the proportion of worker-derived males. The development and social behavior of these artificial colonies were similar to those of normal colonies. Despite a high worker reproduction attempt (63.8% of workers had developed ovaries and 38.4% were egg-layers), we found that on average 95% of the males produced during the competition phase (CPh) were queen-derived. However, in four colonies, queen death resulted in a considerable amount of worker-derived male production. The different putative ultimate causes of this efficient control by the queen are discussed, and we suggest a possible scenario of an evolutionary arms race that may occur between these two female castes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Beekman M, Van Stratum P (1998) Bumblebee sex ratios: why do bumblebees produce so many males? Proc R Soc Lond B 26:1535–1543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch G, Hefetz A (1999) Regulation of reproduction by dominant workers in bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) queenright colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 45:125–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourke AFG (1994) Worker matricide in social bees and wasps. J Evol Biol 167:283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourke AFG (1999) Colony size, social complexity and reproductive conflict in social insects. J Evol Biol 12:245–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourke AFG, Ratnieks FLW (2001) Kin-selected conflict in the bumble-bee Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Proc Royal Soc Lond B 268:347–355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown MJF, Schmid-Hempel R, Schmid-Hempel P (2003) Queen-controlled sex ratios and worker reproduction in the bumble bee Bombus hypnorum, as revealed by microsatellites. Mol Ecol 12:1599–1605

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Büning J (1994) The insect ovary. Chapman and Hall, London

  • Crozier RH, Pamilo P (1996) Evolution of social insect colonies: sex allocation and kin selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchateau MJ, Velthuis HHW (1989) Ovarian development and egg laying in workers of Bombus terrestris. Entomol Exp Appl 51:199–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodnight KF, Queller DC (1999) RELATEDNESS 4.2c. Goodnight Software, Houston, Tex.

  • Kerr WE (1969) Some aspects of the evolution of social bees (Apidae). In: Dobzhansky T, Hecht M, Steere W (eds) Evolutionary biology. Aplleton-Century Crofts, New York, pp 119–175

  • Lopez-Vaamonde C, Koning JW, Jordan WC, Bourke AFG (2003) No evidence that reproductive bumblebee workers reduce the production of new queens. Anim Behav 65:577–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen RE, Plowright R (1982) Worker–queen conflict and male parentage in bumblebees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:91–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Paxton RJ, Thoren PA, Estoup A, Tengö J (2001) Queen–worker conflict over male production and the sex ratio in a facultatively polyandrous bumblebee, Bombus hypnorum: the consequences of nest usurpation. Mol Ecol 10:2489–2498

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richards KW (1977) Ovarian development of queen and worker bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in southern Alberta. Can Entomol 109:109–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Hempel R, Schmid-Hempel P (2000) Female mating frequencies in Bombus sp from central Europe. Insectes Soc 47:36–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Honk CGJ, Röseler PF, Velthuis HHW, Hoogeven JC (1981) Factors influencing the egg laying of workers in a captive Bombus terrestris colony. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9:9–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Velthuis HHW, Alves DA, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL, Duchateau MJ (2002) Worker bees and the fate of their eggs. Proc Exp Appl Entomol 13:97–102

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Paul Devienne for technical assistance and to Sabine Chagny and Riviane Rodrigues da Hora for their help in genetic analyses. We thank Michel Solignac for supplying primers for our tests and Rumsaïs Blatrix, Tatiana Giraud, and Antoine Pezon for helpful comments. We thank Nomi Paz for editorial assistance. The experiments comply with the current laws of France.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cédric Alaux.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alaux, C., Savarit, F., Jaisson, P. et al. Does the queen win it all? Queen–worker conflict over male production in the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris. Naturwissenschaften 91, 400–403 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-004-0547-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-004-0547-3

Keywords

Navigation