Skip to main content
Log in

Symmetry is in the eye of the ‘beeholder’: innate preference for bilateral symmetry in flower-naïve bumblebees

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Naturwissenschaften Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bilateral symmetry has been considered as an indicator of phenotypic and genotypic quality supporting innate preferences for highly symmetric partners. Insect pollinators preferentially visit flowers of a particular symmetry type, thus leading to the suggestion that they have innate preferences for symmetrical flowers or flower models. Here we show that flower-naïve bumblebees (Bombus terrestris), with no experience of symmetric or asymmetric patterns and whose visual experience was accurately controlled, have innate preferences for bilateral symmetry. The presence of color cues did not influence the bees’ original preference. Our results thus show that bilateral symmetry is innately preferred in the context of food search, a fact that supports the selection of symmetry in flower displays. Furthermore, such innate preferences indicate that the nervous system of naïve animals may be primed to respond to relevant sensory cues in the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1 a
Fig. 2

References

  • Backhaus W (1991) Color opponent coding in the visual system of the honeybee. Vision Res 31:1381–1397

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chittka L, Thomson JD, Waser NM (1999) Flower constancy, insect psychology, and plant evolution. Naturwissenschaften 86:361–377

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Enquist M, Arak A (1994) Symmetry, beauty and evolution. Nature 372:169–172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Enquist M, Johnstone RA (1997) Generalization and the evolution of symmetry preferences. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1345–1368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Free JB (1970) Effect of flower shapes and nectar guides on the behaviour of foraging honeybees. Behaviour 37:269–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Giurfa M, Núñez JA, Chittka L, Menzel R (1995) Colour preferences of flower-naïve honeybees. J Comp Physiol A 177:247–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Giurfa M, Eichmann B, Menzel R (1996) Symmetry perception in an insect. Nature 382:458–461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giurfa M, Dafni A, Neal PR (1999) Floral symmetry and its role in plant–pollinator systems. Int J Plant Sci 160:S41–S50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gumbert A (2000) Color choices by bumble bees (Bombus terrestris): innate preferences and generalization after learning. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48:36–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansson L, Forkman B, Enquist M (2002) Experimental evidence of receiver bias for symmetry. Anim Behav 63:617–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer M (1999) Shape perception in the honeybee: symmetry as a global framework. Int J Plant Sci 160:S51–S65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer M, Horridge GA, Zhang SW, Gadagkar R (1995) Shape vision in bees: innate preference for flower-like patterns. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 347:123–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel R (1985) Learning in honeybees in an ecological and behavioral context. In: Hölldobler B, Lindauer M (eds) Experimental behavioral ecology. Fischer, Stuttgart, pp 55–74

  • Møller AP (1990) Fluctuating asymmetry in male sexual ornaments may reliably reveal male quality. Anim Behav 40:1185–1187

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (1995) Bumblebee preference for symmetrical flowers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:2288–2292

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (2000) Developmental stability and pollination. Oecologia 123:149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Eriksson M (1994) Patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in flowers: implications for sexual selection in plants. J Evol Biol 7:97–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Eriksson M (1995) Pollinator preference for symmetrical flowers and sexual selection in plants. Oikos 73:15–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Thornhill R (1998) Bilateral symmetry and sexual selection: a meta-analysis. Am Nat 151:174–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morales D, Pashler H (1999) No role for colour in symmetry perception. Nature 399:115–116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neal PR, Dafni A, Giurfa M (1998) Floral symmetry and its role in plant–pollinator systems: terminology, distribution and hypotheses. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:345–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson PJ, Thornhill R (1994) Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. Trends Ecol Evol 9:21–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West EL, Laverty TM (1998) Effect of floral symmetry on flower choice and foraging behaviour of bumble bees. Can J Zool 76:730–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Special thanks are due to D. Osorio for the stimulus-generating program. We also thank A. Cocucci, N. Deisig, R. Menzel, and S. Stach for useful comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the German and the French Research Councils and the University Paul-Sabatier to M. Giurfa. I. Rodríguez was supported by a short fellowship from the DAAD (German Academic Exchange Service).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Giurfa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodríguez, I., Gumbert, A., Hempel de Ibarra, N. et al. Symmetry is in the eye of the ‘beeholder’: innate preference for bilateral symmetry in flower-naïve bumblebees. Naturwissenschaften 91, 374–377 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-004-0537-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-004-0537-5

Keywords

Navigation