Abstract
Accurate recognition requires that visual systems must be able to discriminate between target and distractor stimuli. Flowers are learned and recognised by bees using visual cues including colour and shape. We investigated whether bees were able to learn to discriminate between colours differently depending upon absolute or differential conditioning. For absolute conditioning bees were rewarded with sucrose solution for visits to target flowers. When distractor stimuli were subsequently presented, a high level of discrimination was observed if there was a perceptually large colour distance separating distractors and targets, but for a perceptually small colour distance the bees generalised and did not discriminate between stimuli. When provided with differential conditioning where both target and distractors were present, the bees learnt to discriminate stimuli separated by a perceptually small colour distance. This shows that for bees to learn fine colour discrimination tasks it is important to use differential conditioning. The findings are discussed within the context of the necessity for plants to produce distinctive flower colours.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Backhaus W, Menzel R, Kreissl (1987) Multidimensional scaling of colour similarity in bees. Biol Cybern 56:293–304
Chittka L (1992) The colour hexagon: a chromaticity diagram based on photoreceptor excitations as a generalized representation of colour opponency. J Comp Physiol A 170:533–543
Chittka L (1996) Does bee color vision predate the evolution of flower color? Naturwissenschaften 83:136–138
Chittka L, Menzel R (1992) The evolutionary adaptation of flower colours and the insect pollinators’ colour vision. J Comp Physiol A 171:171–181
Chittka L, Gumbert A, Kunze J (1997) Foraging dynamics of bumble bees: correlates of movements within and between plant species. Behav Ecol 8:239–249
Chittka L, Thomson JD, Waser NM (1999) Flower constancy, insect psychology, and plant evolution. Naturwissenschaften 86:361–377
Chittka L, Spaethe J, Schmidt A, Hickelsberger A (2001) Adaptation, constraint, and chance in the evolution of flower color and pollinator color vision. In: Chittka L, Thompson JD (eds) Cognitive ecology of pollination. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 106–126
Chittka L, Dyer AG, Bock F, Dornhaus A (2003) Bees trade off foraging speed for accuracy. Nature 424:388
Dafni A (1984) Mimicry and deception in pollination. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:259–278
Dyer AG, Chittka L (2004) Biological significance of distinguishing between similar colours in spectrally variable illumination: bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) as a case study. J Comp Physiol A 190:105–114
Giurfa M, Hammer M, Stach S, Stollhoff N, Muller-Deisig N, Mizyrycki C (1999) Pattern learning by honeybees: conditioning procedure and recognition strategy. Anim Behav 57:315–324
Giurfa M, Zhang S, Jenett A, Menzel R, Srinivasan M (2001) The concept of ‘sameness’ and difference in an insect. Nature 410:930–933
Gumbert A (2000) Color choices by bumble bees (Bombus terrestris): innate preferences and generalization after learning. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48:36–43
Peitsch D, Fietz A, Hertel H, Souza J de, Ventura DF, Menzel R (1992) The spectral input systems of hymenopteran insects and their receptor-based colour vision. J Comp Physiol A 170:23–40
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank M. Giurfa, L. Muir and two anonymous referees for their comments on the manuscript. A.G.D. is grateful for support from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dyer, A.G., Chittka, L. Fine colour discrimination requires differential conditioning in bumblebees. Naturwissenschaften 91, 224–227 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-004-0508-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-004-0508-x