Skip to main content
Log in

Costs and benefits of subordinate queens in colonies of the ant, Leptothorax gredleri

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Naturwissenschaften Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Queens of some species of social insects form dominance hierarchies in which only the top-ranking individual reproduces. Such unequal partitioning of reproduction can be stable when subordinate queens increase their inclusive fitness indirectly by helping to rear a related dominant queen's offspring. We investigated whether subordinate queens of the ant, Leptothorax gredleri, affect the reproductive success of the dominant queen. In laboratory colonies with two queens, first eggs were laid approximately 20 days later than in colonies with a single queen, presumably due to aggressive competition among nestmate queens. Nevertheless, two-queen colonies produced on average more brood than one-queen colonies, although egg laying was completely or almost completely monopolized by one single queen. The presence of a subordinate queen therefore appears to increase the productivity of the dominant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  • Bourke AFG (1991) Queen behaviour, reproduction and egg-cannibalism in multiple-queen colonies of the ant Leptothorax acervorum. Anim Behav 42:295–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourke AFG (1994) Indiscriminate egg cannibalism and reproductive skew in a multiple queen-ant. Proc R Soc Lond B 255:55–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourke AFG, Heinze J (1994) The ecology of communal breeding: the case of multiply-queened leptothoracine ants. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 345:359–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschinger A (1967) Verbreitung und Auswirkungen von Mono- und Polygynie bei Arten der Gattung Leptothorax Mayr (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Inaugural-Dissertation, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Germany

  • Buschinger A (1968) Mono- und Polygynie bei Arten der Gattung Leptothorax Mayr (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insectes Soc 15:217–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschinger A (1974a) Experimente und Beobachtungen zur Gründung und Entwicklung neuer Sozietäten der sklavenhaltenden Ameise Harpagoxenus sublaevis (Nyl.). Insectes Soc 21:381–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschinger A (1974b) Polymorphismus und Kastendetermination im Ameisentribus Leptothoracini. In: G.H. Schmidt (ed) Sozialpolymorphismus bei Insekten. Wiss Verlagsges, Stuttgart, pp 604–623

  • Cole BJ (1986) The social behavior of Leptothorax allardycei (Hymenoptera, Formicidae): time budgets and the evolution of worker reproduction. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:165–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobin B, Heinze J, Strätz M, Roces F (2003) The energetic costs of reproductive conflicts in the ant Pachycondyla obscuricornis. J Insect Physiol 49:747–752

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heinze J (1995) Reproductive skew and relatedness in Leptothorax ants. Proc R Soc Lond B 261:375–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinze J, Ortius D (1991) Social organization of Leptothorax acervorum from Alaska (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche 98:227–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinze J, Smith TA (1990) Dominance and fertility in a functionally monogynous ant. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinze J, Lipski N, Hölldobler B (1992) Reproductive competition in colonies of the ant Leptothorax gredleri. Ethology 90:265–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinze J, Oberstadt B, Tentschert J, Hölldobler B, Bestmann HJ (1998) Colony specificity of Dufour gland secretions in a functionally monogynous ant. Chemoecology 8:169–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinze J, Hartmann A, Rüppell O (2001) Sex allocation ratios in the facultatively polygynous ant, Leptothorax acervorum. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:270–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone RA (2000) Models of reproductive skew: a review and synthesis. Ethology 106:5–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasuya E (2001) Mann-Whitney U test when variances are unequal. Anim Behav 61:1247–1249

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeping MG (1992) Social organization and division of labour in colonies of the polistine wasps, Belonogaster petiolata. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31:211–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipski N, Heinze J, Hölldobler B (1992) Social organization of three European Leptothorax species (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). In: Billen J (ed) Biology and evolution of social insects. Leuven University Press, Leuven, pp 287–290

  • Ortius D, Heinze J (1995) Dynamics and consequences of hierarchy formation in the ant, Leptothorax sp. A. Ethology 99:223–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortius D, Heinze J (1999) Fertility signaling in queens of a North American ant. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 45:151–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve HK, Ratnieks FLW (1993) Queen–queen conflicts in polygynous societies: mutual tolerance and reproductive skew. In: Keller L (ed) Queen number and sociality in insects. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 45–85

  • Vehrencamp S (1983) A model for the evolution of despotic versus egalitarian societies. Anim Behav 31:667–682

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (He 1623/8–2).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Heinze.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heinze, J., Oberstadt, B. Costs and benefits of subordinate queens in colonies of the ant, Leptothorax gredleri . Naturwissenschaften 90, 513–516 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-003-0467-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-003-0467-7

Keywords

Navigation