Abstract
The cicada species Tibicina haematodes and Cicada orni are two sympatric species often inhabiting vineyards. We show that they occupy two distinct levels: males of T. haematodes produce their calling songs from a high position in vine foliage while males of C. orni call from a low position near the ground on vine trunks. Experiments consisting of broadcasting and re-recording experimental signals in natural habitats from low and high positions show that signals are more and more modified as sender–receiver distance increases. T. haematodes would have an advantage when calling on trunks rather than on branches whereas C. orni would be able to call indiscriminately from both low and high positions. Thus, the microhabitat segregation observed between T. haematodes and C orni in vineyards does not seem to be related to calling song propagation constraints, but may be due to other ethological or ecological factors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Alexander RD, Moore TE (1958) Studies on the acoustical behaviour of seventeen-year cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae: Magicicada). Ohio J Sci 58:107–127
Aubin T (1994) Syntana: a software for the synthesis and analysis of animal sounds. Bioacoustics 6:80–81
Aubin T, Jouventin P (2002) How to identify vocally a kin in a crowd? The penguin model. Adv Study Behav 31:243–277
Boulard M (1973) Apparence et mimétisme chez les Cigales. Bull Soc Entomol Fr 90:1016–1051
Dabelsteen T, Larsen ON, Pedersen SB (1993) Habitat induced degradation of sounds signals: quantifying the effects of communication sounds in bird location on blur ratio, excess attenuation, and signal to noise ratio in blackbird song. J Acoust Soc Am 93:2206–2220
Endler JA (1993) Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B 340:215–225
Hastings JM, Toolson EC (1991) Thermoregulation and activity of two syntopic cicadas, Tibicen chiricahua and T. duryi (Homoptera: Cicadidae), in central New Mexico. Oecologia 85:513–520
Henwood K, Fabrick A (1979) A quantitative analysis of the dawn chorus: temporal selection for communicatory optimization. Am Nat 114:260–274
Kime NM, Turner WR, Ryan MJ (2000) The transmission of advertisement calls in Central American frogs. Behav Ecol 11:71–83
Marten K, Marler P (1977) Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization. I. Temperate habitats. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:271–290
Marten K, Quine D, Marler P (1977) Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization. II. Tropical forest habitats. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:291–302
Mathevon N, Aubin T, Dabelsteen T (1996) Song degradation during propagation: importance of song post for the wren Troglodytes troglodytes. Ethology 102:397–412
Michelsen A, Larsen ON (1983) Strategies for acoustic communication in complex environments. In: Huber F, Markl H (eds) Neuroethology and behavioral physiology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 321–331
Nemeth E, Winkler H, Dabelsteen T (2001) Differential degradation of antbirds in a Neotropical rainforest: adaptation of perch height? J Acoust Soc Am 110:3263–3274
Quartau AJ, Rebeiro MT, Simões PC, Fernandes TM, Claridge MF, Drosopoulos S, Morgan JC (1999) Acoustic signals of Cicada orni L. in Portugal and Greece (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Cicadomorpha: Cicadidae). Reichenbachia 33:71–80
Richards DG, Wiley RH (1980) Reverberations and amplitude fluctuations in the propagation of sound in a forest: implication for animal communication. Am Nat 115:381–399
Stephen RO, Hartley JC (1991) The transmission of bush-crickets calls in natural environments. J Exp Biol 155:227–244
Sueur J (2002) Cicada acoustic communication: potential sound partitioning in a multispecies community from Mexico (Hemiptera : Cicadomorpha: Cicadidae). Biol J Linn Soc 75:379–394
Sueur J, Aubin T (2002a) Acoustic communication in the Palaearctic red cicada Tibicina haematodes: chorus organisation, calling song structure, and signal recognition. Can J Zool 80:126–136
Sueur J, Aubin T (2002b) The decoding process in the acoustic communication of the Palaearctic red cicada (Cicadomorpha, Cicadidae, Tibicina haematodes): how males reply to synthetic calling songs. 11th International Auchenorrhyncha Congress, Potsdam/Berlin, Germany, 37
Wiley RH, Richards DG (1978) Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 3:69–94
Wiley RH, Richards DG (1982) Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: sound transmission and signal detection. In: Kroodsma D, Miller EH, Ouellet H (eds) Acoustic communication in birds. Academic Press, New York, pp 131–181
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Jean-Marie Hermel and Hubert Sueur for their kind assistance during experiments and to the referees for improving the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sueur, J., Aubin, T. Is microhabitat segregation between two cicada species (Tibicina haematodes and Cicada orni) due to calling song propagation constraints?. Naturwissenschaften 90, 322–326 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-003-0432-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-003-0432-5