The treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture continues to be a controversial subject. This study was undertaken to compare long-term results of different therapy regimens A total of 52 patients (mean age: 34.7±3.2 years) who underwent ACL reconstruction using the central one third of the patellar tendon and 32 patients (mean age: 38.3±5.2 years) treated conservatively were evaluated 5–7 years clinically, radiologically and with respect to their sports activities. In all, 25% of the patients operated on subjectively rated their knees as ``excellent'', 40.4% as ``very good'', 22.2% ``good'', 12.5% ``fair'' and 0% as ``poor''. The ratings for the conservatively treated group were: 12.9%, 19.4%, 29%, 25.8% and 12.5%, respectively. The results of the OAK score were significantly better for the surgically treated group (87.5±7.1 points compared with 77.1±13.4). An increasing number of degenerative changes were found on radiographs in both groups at follow-up as compared with their pre-injury status.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fink, C., Hoser, C., Benedetto, K. et al. Langzeitergebnisse nach konservativer oder operativer Therapie der vorderen Kreuzbandruptur. Unfallchirurg 99, 964–969 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001130050081
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001130050081