Skip to main content
Log in

Knieendoprothetik – eine Standortbestimmung

  • Originalien
  • Published:
Der Unfallchirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A nationwide survey was performed to evaluate the significance of knee replacement (endoprosthesis) in Germany. All orthopaedic, traumatologic and general surgeons were asked about their preferred surgical techniques, favourite types of prosthesis and related issues. Sledge prostheses have been increasingly preferred to constrained prostheses in the last few years. Unicompartmental prostheses as well as constrained prostheses and high tibial osteotomies are still chosen for special cases. Revisions were most commonly due to patella problems. Patella replacement is popular to prevent this problem. Endoprosthetic knee surgery receives as much endorsement among German surgeons as endoprosthetic hip surgery. An important problem is the increasing costs of the method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fuchs, S., Jerosch, J. Knieendoprothetik – eine Standortbestimmung. Unfallchirurg 99, 958–963 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001130050080

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001130050080

Navigation