Skip to main content

Behandlungsoptionen instabiler OSG-Frakturen bei älteren Menschen

Die kritische Auseinandersetzung mit einem „systematic review“

Treatment options for unstable ankle fractures in older adults

Critical examination with a systematic review

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Literatur

  1. 1.

    Court-Brown CM, Caesar B (2006) Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury 37:691–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Davidovitch RI, Walsh M, Spitzer A et al (2009) Functional outcome after operatively treated ankle fractures in the elderly. Foot Ankle Int 30:728–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Georgiannos D, Lampridis V, Bisbinas I (2017) Fragility fractures of the ankle in the elderly: open reduction and internal fixation versus tibio-talo-calcaneal nailing: short-term results of a prospective randomized-controlled study. Injury 48:519–524

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Makwana NK, Bhowal B, Harper WM et al (2001) Conservative versus operative treatment for displaced ankle fractures in patients over 55 years of age. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:525–529

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, Moher D, Tugwell P, Welch V, Kristjansson E, Henry DA (2017) AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ 358:j4008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    White TO, Bugler KE, Appleton P et al (2016) A prospective randomised controlled trial of the fibular nail versus standard open reduction and internal fixation for fixation of ankle fractures in elderly patients. Bone Joint J 98-B:1248–1252

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Willett K, Keene DJ, Mistry D et al (2016) Close contact casting vs surgery for initial treatment of unstable ankle fractures in older adults: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 316:1455–1463

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Neubert.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

A. Neubert und C. Jaekel sind Koordinatorinnen des Projekt TraumaEvidence der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie. A. Neubert und C. Jaekel geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Additional information

figureqr

QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen

Redaktion

Wolf Mutschler, München

Tobias Renkawitz, Heidelberg

Dirk Stengel, Berlin

figureb

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Neubert, A., Jaekel, C. Behandlungsoptionen instabiler OSG-Frakturen bei älteren Menschen. Unfallchirurg 124, 872–874 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-021-01066-8

Download citation